How to change personal info?
2005 rule changes announced
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Other sport > 2005 rule changes announced 2 March 2005 00:31:29

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

2005 rule changes announced

Dave R knows who 15 February 2005 11:06:44
 http://www.motorspor­t.com/news/article.a­sp?ID=177350&F=N


I like it, esp the pit road order.


Add comment
Maple1 15 February 2005 18:00:43 permanent link ]
 And the FORCED pit stop Rule GONE YAhoo about time they got rid of that
one
Hated that one the most.

Dave R knows who wrote:>
I like it, esp the pit road order.
Add comment
David Reininger 15 February 2005 19:46:06 permanent link ]
 

"Frank....." wrote:
I hope everyone who is excited about this news will be around to defend it> after the third race without any (routine) out of sequence stops and no one> able to "push hard".

There's no sense in pushing hard if there's no room to pass.







Add comment
Fred M 15 February 2005 21:47:15 permanent link ]
 
"David Reininger" <dreining@gmu.edu> wrote in message
news:4212193E.85126­857@gmu.edu...>
"Frank....." wrote:>
I hope everyone who is excited about this news will be around to defend it> > after the third race without any (routine) out of sequence stops and no one> > able to "push hard".>
There's no sense in pushing hard if there's no room to pass.>

Tell that to Tracy ;-)­


jim


Add comment
Alien 16 February 2005 00:46:42 permanent link ]
 
"Fred M" <ask.4.email@outloo­k.com> wrote in message
news:37eqt2F5bnoe2U­1@individual.net...>­
"David Reininger" <dreining@gmu.edu> wrote in message> news:4212193E.85126­857@gmu.edu...>>
"Frank....." wrote:>>
I hope everyone who is excited about this news will be around to defend >> > it>> > after the third race without any (routine) out of sequence stops and no >> > one>> > able to "push hard".>>
There's no sense in pushing hard if there's no room to pass.>>
Tell that to Tracy ;-)­>

Or to Bourdais last year at Denver. Man that was some HARD driving!

alien


Add comment
Newton 18 February 2005 03:09:31 permanent link ]
 David Reininger wrote:
"Frank....." wrote:>
I hope everyone who is excited about this news will be around to defend it>>after the third race without any (routine) out of sequence stops and no one>>able to "push hard".>
There's no sense in pushing hard if there's no room to pass.

Put your foot down and turn left. Real racing...yeah right, oops no, left.
Suck it in DumbDave, you're still a loser in a losing league.

Newt
Add comment
Jason Hoehn 18 February 2005 03:35:44 permanent link ]
 
"Newton" <bazoombz@netnet.ne­t> wrote in message
news:37kml8F5ev72oU­2@individual.net...
Put your foot down and turn left. Real racing...yeah right, oops no,
left.> Suck it in DumbDave, you're still a loser in a losing league.

Ahhh Newt,... We've missed ya buddy :-)­



Add comment
America is #1 19 February 2005 19:43:04 permanent link ]
 In article <cut1l8$3l0$1@uwm.e­du>, "Frank....." <ask@me.net> wrote:

Maybe....I'm glad the mandatory stops are gone but how long will it be until> we once again hear the complaining about "fuel mileage" runs?

The alternative is worse.

Fuel mileage runs are real racing. Pit-lane fiascos are not.
Add comment
America is #1 19 February 2005 19:45:40 permanent link ]
 In article <4212193E.85126857@­gmu.edu>,
David Reininger <dreining@gmu.edu> wrote:
"Frank....." wrote:>
I hope everyone who is excited about this news will be around to defend it> > after the third race without any (routine) out of sequence stops and no one> > able to "push hard".>
There's no sense in pushing hard if there's no room to pass.

You have a hick's appreciation of Racing.
Add comment
JT Shell 25 February 2005 09:20:55 permanent link ]
 
One change I would make to accommodate the higher >speeds would be that >crew>are not allowed over the wall until the car is stopped, >and the car can't>leave until they are all back.

Then would this not negate the raising of the pit speed limit?


Add comment
Frank..... 2 March 2005 00:31:29 permanent link ]
 JT Shell wrote:
One change I would make to accommodate the higher >speeds would be that>>crew>>are not allowed over the wall until the car is stopped, >and the car can't>>leave until they are all back.>
Then would this not negate the raising of the pit speed limit?

It would offset the gain certainly, but not eliminate it entirely. And it
would go a long way to making the change saleable to those who would drag
their feet.

--
Frank....H
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Other sport > 2005 rule changes announced 2 March 2005 00:31:29

see also:
rec.autos.sport.nascar.moderated strand
Simmons - RPG - Bristol II
Re: RPG Richmond The Hanna 400 +1 +17
pass tests:
see also:
Hyundai window parts
In Deep Water
2002 mercedes s500 AC stays on for a…

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .