Can I hide a part of the text by a "More..." link?
1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data
Hello Guest		   
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog		   • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels		   • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests		   • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search		   • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru		   • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online		  
Register!
CarGuru > Jeep Willys > 1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data 19 April 2005 18:53:44
  Recent blog posts: 
95 mirage
I have a 95 mirage and this is the second time the injector in number 3 cylinder has gone bad. Anything…

1988 Ford F-150 Truck
I would like to remove the pollution control system from my 1988 F-150, 4.9L I6 300 4x4. Can anyone…

my 99 M chrysler has started to…
my 99 M chrysler has started to cool and then starts to give off heat in the ac vents and then cool…

dodge 2000 intrepid
bought this car right off the show room floor in Bartow fl to this date I have not had any work done on…

starting issue, 2002 dodge…
My 2002 Dodge Caravan wouldn't crank. I tested some things, replaced the battery. After installing the…

;-)
;-)­

stereo pin
I put a new battery in my girl friends 94 900 and it wants a code for the radio. There is nothing in the…

Coolant temp on Saturn Sky
I just purchased a 2007 Saturn Sky Redline. As I was driving yesterday I happen to have the info set on…

Saturn Sky Red Line
I just purchased a 2007 Saturn Sky Redline. I noticed will driving yesterday that when I turned on the…

Que pour la place trange
Que pour la place trange

  They have birthday today: 
Esther
  Forums:   
    topic feeds

• CarGuru  all topics, blogs and comments

• Driving

• Formula-1

• Indycar

• Nascar

• Other sport

• Technology

• 4 x 4

• Volkswagen

• Mercedes

• Acura

• Alfa-romeo

• Audi

• BMW

• Chrysler

• Dodge

• Ford

• General Motors

• Jeep Willys

• Honda

• Hyundai

• Mazda

• Nissan

• Peugeot

• Pontiac

• Porsche

• Saab

• Saturn

• Toyota

• Volvo

• Buy / Sell

• Open discussion

• Anonymous
  Discuss: 
Pulse in Engine RPM
there is a pulse in RPM's at certain speeds....usually around 50.... be driving, then a pulse of a gain…

1994 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE…
Hi, I am the owner of a 1994 jeep grand cherokee limited runs good when it starts but has problems.I…

Grand Cherokee oil level…
Just added a second jeep to the drive, a 1993 grand (ZJ??), anyways the only fault it has is that the…

who are the best posters in…
the best was clearly biil hughes his invice was always the most useful bt he got run off the worst are…
  Recent forum topics: 
Brake Lights won't work
brake lights on 1996 Grand Am won't work. Fuse and lights are fine. Suggestions?

honda civic 87 model problem
i would like some information on why my honda civic wont start at times after its hot when running it…

mazda premacy glowplug lights…
i have a mazda premacy 2litre diesel . have a problem at the moment ,glowplug light flashing with loss…

I have a 96 chrysler new york…
I have a 96 chrysler new york lhs but no owners manuel and on the message center there is a light that i…
  Recent forum comments:
RE: Ask How To Replace Headlight…
how do I release the locking ring on the headlamp bulb in a 99 dodge ram 2500?

RE: Re: Transmission shudder when…
who are you speaking to

RE: Re: Transmission shudder when…
I can feel something like a kick when I first hit the gas pedal when I take off.

RE: stuck hatchback
on the rear gate that is

RE: stuck hatchback
just my latch is stuck and the door wont close on my 2000 sub outback limited

RE: 1999 Chrysler T&C - Speed…
I am reading all of this and am amazed at how bad I am getting ripped off by my Chrysler dealership....4…

RE: How to duplicate Navtech CD’s
where can i buy nav cd's for a 2003 s class mercedes also the latest version for a 2005 sl?

RE: Heating problem in 1988 Honda…
well thats no always true!!! my husband replaced the thermostat/thermome­ter..... and the water…

RE: Mitsubishi Diamante ECU faults…
how did you read the codes

RE: 98 Dodge Grand Caravan Problems
I had the same problem with the instrument panel, after about a months worth of greif, and dollars…
  Ìîäåðàòîð:
 Administrator

1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data

Mike Romain 16 April 2005 02:52:08
 Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep
with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the
emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to
put the directions online:

http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm

It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10
mph extra per gear.

The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will
have to be too far back to pass.

The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM
2525 test I was told.

I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that
I
disabled the computer in.

Specs.

- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.
- 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)
- 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.
- No computer, 'Nuttered'
- Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book
says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of
full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC
base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play
there.)
- 92 octane ESSO gas.
- Ported on the timing advance
- Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00
rebuild kit for the test.
- Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.
- Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.
- 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway

On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.

And 16 ppm HC

And 0.11% CO

Photo of the papers here:
http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87

And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the
paperwork.

Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the
only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to
pass that.

And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It
becomes too old before the next one.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
Jeff Strickland 16 April 2005 03:47:25 [ permanent link ]
 
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to> put the directions online:>

The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed. I
don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the
vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the sniff
test.

There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result in
better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't got all
of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out better
numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even stupid - but
true.




http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> mph extra per gear.>
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> have to be too far back to pass.>
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> 2525 test I was told.>
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> I> disabled the computer in.>
Specs.>
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> - No computer, 'Nuttered'> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> there.)> - 92 octane ESSO gas.> - Ported on the timing advance> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> rebuild kit for the test.> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>
And 16 ppm HC>
And 0.11% CO>
Photo of the papers here:> http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> paperwork.>
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> pass that.>
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> becomes too old before the next one.>
Mike> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


Add comment
Mike Romain 16 April 2005 04:08:18 [ permanent link ]
 All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from
the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.

You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!

If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....

Mike

Jeff Strickland wrote:>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to> > put the directions online:> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed. I> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the sniff> test.>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result in> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't got all> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out better> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even stupid - but> true.>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> > mph extra per gear.> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> > have to be too far back to pass.> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> > 2525 test I was told.> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> > I> > disabled the computer in.> >
Specs.> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> > there.)> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.> > - Ported on the timing advance> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> > rebuild kit for the test.> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.> >
And 16 ppm HC> >
And 0.11% CO> >
Photo of the papers here:> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> > paperwork.> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> > pass that.> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> > becomes too old before the next one.> >
Mike> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
Mike Romain 16 April 2005 06:01:05 [ permanent link ]
 Talk about blatant extortion eh? If I failed, I also could give the
garage $450.00 for a conditional pass.

Just a coincidence that a carb is $365.00 plus $100.00 to put it in eh.

The $tealer still sells the canister and there are places in the US that
sell them so you can still get one.

The canister is needed for decent running and gas fume control but if
dead, it craps out the carb and PCV.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

u know who wrote:>
hmmmmm> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be something> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister guess> what no longer available anywhere.> government sucks>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really sucks> I know I still need an egr though.> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­ > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....> >
Mike> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a> >> > Jeep> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think> >> > to> >> > put the directions online:> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed. I> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the> >> sniff> >> test.> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result in> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't got> >> all> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out> >> better> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even stupid -> >> but> >> true.> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> >> > mph extra per gear.> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> >> > have to be too far back to pass.> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> >> > 2525 test I was told.> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> >> > I> >> > disabled the computer in.> >> >
Specs.> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> >> > there.)> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.> >> > - Ported on the timing advance> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> >> > rebuild kit for the test.> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.> >> >
And 16 ppm HC> >> >
And 0.11% CO> >> >
Photo of the papers here:> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> >> > paperwork.> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> >> > pass that.> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> >> > becomes too old before the next one.> >> >
Mike> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
Mike Romain 16 April 2005 06:02:17 [ permanent link ]
 Oh, you can usually clean the EGR's out. Carbon is an issue and for
sure you need one working to pass the sniffer.

Mike

u know who wrote:>
hmmmmm> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be something> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister guess> what no longer available anywhere.> government sucks>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really sucks> I know I still need an egr though.> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­ > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....> >
Mike> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a> >> > Jeep> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think> >> > to> >> > put the directions online:> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed. I> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the> >> sniff> >> test.> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result in> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't got> >> all> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out> >> better> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even stupid -> >> but> >> true.> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> >> > mph extra per gear.> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> >> > have to be too far back to pass.> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> >> > 2525 test I was told.> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> >> > I> >> > disabled the computer in.> >> >
Specs.> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> >> > there.)> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.> >> > - Ported on the timing advance> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> >> > rebuild kit for the test.> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.> >> >
And 16 ppm HC> >> >
And 0.11% CO> >> >
Photo of the papers here:> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> >> > paperwork.> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> >> > pass that.> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> >> > becomes too old before the next one.> >> >
Mike> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
Mike Romain 16 April 2005 06:07:25 [ permanent link ]
 Oh, an EGR is a hundred, the canister is $165 for the last one I saw
bought, add 2 hours labour to get $180 to put the crap in should get you
the extortion pass....

Mike

Mike Romain wrote:>
Talk about blatant extortion eh? If I failed, I also could give the> garage $450.00 for a conditional pass.>
Just a coincidence that a carb is $365.00 plus $100.00 to put it in eh.>
The $tealer still sells the canister and there are places in the US that> sell them so you can still get one.>
The canister is needed for decent running and gas fume control but if> dead, it craps out the carb and PCV.>
Mike> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's>
u know who wrote:> >
hmmmmm> > I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be something> > that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions> > the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister guess> > what no longer available anywhere.> > government sucks> >
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really sucks> > I know I still need an egr though.> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> > news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­ > > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from> > > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.> > >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!> > >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....> > >
Mike> > >
Jeff Strickland wrote:> > >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> > >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ > >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a> > >> > Jeep> > >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> > >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think> > >> > to> > >> > put the directions online:> > >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed. I> > >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the> > >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the> > >> sniff> > >> test.> > >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result in> > >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't got> > >> all> > >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out> > >> better> > >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even stupid -> > >> but> > >> true.> > >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm> > >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> > >> > mph extra per gear.> > >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> > >> > have to be too far back to pass.> > >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> > >> > 2525 test I was told.> > >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> > >> > I> > >> > disabled the computer in.> > >> >
Specs.> > >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> > >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> > >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> > >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'> > >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> > >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> > >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> > >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> > >> > there.)> > >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.> > >> > - Ported on the timing advance> > >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> > >> > rebuild kit for the test.> > >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> > >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> > >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway> > >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.> > >> >
And 16 ppm HC> > >> >
And 0.11% CO> > >> >
Photo of the papers here:> > >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87> > >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> > >> > paperwork.> > >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> > >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> > >> > pass that.> > >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> > >> > becomes too old before the next one.> > >> >
Mike> > >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> > >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
U Know Who 16 April 2005 08:08:34 [ permanent link ]
 ya extortion test that's a good name for it.
it appears my egr is broken as the swivel vacuum nipple seems to be bent and
the housing of where the vacuum nipple sits is cracked and broken.

I'm going to pay for the diagnostics test then take the recommendations and
do the work myself and keep a folder with receipts. then take it back for
the retest once I hit my limit. and also at that point I will have my new
egr and whatever else they recommend as well as my nutter bypass and 3
ounces of acetone added to the fuel.

On my e test they put that I have a 4.0L.
On my asm2525 test my NO ppm was 3677 timing was way to advanced limit was
893. And curb idle test HC ppm was 325 limit was 200.reason idle to high and
mixture screws set to rich. also CO% was 1.03 missed a pass by .04

well at least I can assume that I should pass next time as the jeep was so
out of tune. reason for being out of tune I found a bad vacuum leak and
never adjusted the carb to reflect the stopped vacuum leak.

been so long since I played with a carbed equipped veh. and the fact that it
is also computer controlled sucks. which basically means that some of my
adjustment can be over ruled by the computer.

alwell

keep fingers crossed for Tuesday. diagnostic day.
the retest down the road.
not so bad cause ministry issued me real plates even though it was a resale
change of ownership. so theoretically I don't require a test till my plate
renewal.


"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:42607229.7E0A0­3D7@sympatico.ca...>­ Oh, you can usually clean the EGR's out. Carbon is an issue and for> sure you need one working to pass the sniffer.>
Mike>
u know who wrote:>>
hmmmmm>> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be something>> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions>> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister guess>> what no longer available anywhere.>> government sucks>>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really sucks>> I know I still need an egr though.>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­> > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from>> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.>> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!>> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....>> >
Mike>> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:>> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­> >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a>> >> > Jeep>> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the>> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I >> >> > think>> >> > to>> >> > put the directions online:>> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed. >> >> I>> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the>> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the>> >> sniff>> >> test.>> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result in>> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't got>> >> all>> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out>> >> better>> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even >> >> stupid ->> >> but>> >> true.>> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' >> >> > 10>> >> > mph extra per gear.>> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will>> >> > have to be too far back to pass.>> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the >> >> > ASM>> >> > 2525 test I was told.>> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 >> >> > that>> >> > I>> >> > disabled the computer in.>> >> >
Specs.>> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.>> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)>> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.>> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'>> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the >> >> > book>> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting >> >> > of>> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. >> >> > BTDC>> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play>> >> > there.)>> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.>> >> > - Ported on the timing advance>> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00>> >> > rebuild kit for the test.>> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.>> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.>> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>> >> >
And 16 ppm HC>> >> >
And 0.11% CO>> >> >
Photo of the papers here:>> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of >> >> > the>> >> > paperwork.>> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just >> >> > the>> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have >> >> > to>> >> > pass that.>> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! >> >> > It>> >> > becomes too old before the next one.>> >> >
Mike>> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00>> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


Add comment
Chuck 16 April 2005 17:12:58 [ permanent link ]
 I've done the "Nutter" - it is very sweet and easy. The power is seat of the
pants noticeable. You can hide the wires easy. Definitely 2 thumbs up.

We don't have to have things stuffed up our tail in Missouri (yet).
Chuck


"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to> put the directions online:>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> mph extra per gear.>
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> have to be too far back to pass.>
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> 2525 test I was told.>
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> I> disabled the computer in.>
Specs.>
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> - No computer, 'Nuttered'> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> there.)> - 92 octane ESSO gas.> - Ported on the timing advance> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> rebuild kit for the test.> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>
And 16 ppm HC>
And 0.11% CO>
Photo of the papers here:> http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> paperwork.>
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> pass that.>
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> becomes too old before the next one.>
Mike> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


Add comment
Mike Romain 16 April 2005 17:53:02 [ permanent link ]
 You need to be really careful there.

That 'extortion' money is only valid if you pay it to the garage, doing
the work yourself doesn't/didn't count and even with receipts might not
work. It didn't work when I first tried it on my Cherokee that failed.
Turns out mine was under O2 recall, so once they did that the Cherokee
passed.

I would 'not' add any cleaner like acetone to the fuel system. That can
put tons of crud into the gas that can take weeks to get burned through
and will likely set the sniffer off.

Oh you also will get your next test for free!

Because they put the wrong engine down, the test was not valid and they
still owe you for the test you paid for. Really, this has happened to
friends before, just take back in the paperwork.

Mike

u know who wrote:>
ya extortion test that's a good name for it.> it appears my egr is broken as the swivel vacuum nipple seems to be bent and> the housing of where the vacuum nipple sits is cracked and broken.>
I'm going to pay for the diagnostics test then take the recommendations and> do the work myself and keep a folder with receipts. then take it back for> the retest once I hit my limit. and also at that point I will have my new> egr and whatever else they recommend as well as my nutter bypass and 3> ounces of acetone added to the fuel.>
On my e test they put that I have a 4.0L.> On my asm2525 test my NO ppm was 3677 timing was way to advanced limit was> 893. And curb idle test HC ppm was 325 limit was 200.reason idle to high and> mixture screws set to rich. also CO% was 1.03 missed a pass by .04>
well at least I can assume that I should pass next time as the jeep was so> out of tune. reason for being out of tune I found a bad vacuum leak and> never adjusted the carb to reflect the stopped vacuum leak.>
been so long since I played with a carbed equipped veh. and the fact that it> is also computer controlled sucks. which basically means that some of my> adjustment can be over ruled by the computer.>
alwell>
keep fingers crossed for Tuesday. diagnostic day.> the retest down the road.> not so bad cause ministry issued me real plates even though it was a resale> change of ownership. so theoretically I don't require a test till my plate> renewal.>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> news:42607229.7E0A0­3D7@sympatico.ca...>­ > Oh, you can usually clean the EGR's out. Carbon is an issue and for> > sure you need one working to pass the sniffer.> >
Mike> >
u know who wrote:> >>
hmmmmm> >> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be something> >> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions> >> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister guess> >> what no longer available anywhere.> >> government sucks> >>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really sucks> >> I know I still need an egr though.> >> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> >> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­ >> > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from> >> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.> >> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!> >> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....> >> >
Mike> >> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:> >> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> >> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ >> >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a> >> >> > Jeep> >> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> >> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I> >> >> > think> >> >> > to> >> >> > put the directions online:> >> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed.> >> >> I> >> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the> >> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the> >> >> sniff> >> >> test.> >> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result in> >> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't got> >> >> all> >> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out> >> >> better> >> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even> >> >> stupid -> >> >> but> >> >> true.> >> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm> >> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy'> >> >> > 10> >> >> > mph extra per gear.> >> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> >> >> > have to be too far back to pass.> >> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the> >> >> > ASM> >> >> > 2525 test I was told.> >> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7> >> >> > that> >> >> > I> >> >> > disabled the computer in.> >> >> >
Specs.> >> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> >> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> >> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> >> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'> >> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the> >> >> > book> >> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting> >> >> > of> >> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg.> >> >> > BTDC> >> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> >> >> > there.)> >> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.> >> >> > - Ported on the timing advance> >> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> >> >> > rebuild kit for the test.> >> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> >> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> >> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway> >> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.> >> >> >
And 16 ppm HC> >> >> >
And 0.11% CO> >> >> >
Photo of the papers here:> >> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87> >> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of> >> >> > the> >> >> > paperwork.> >> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just> >> >> > the> >> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have> >> >> > to> >> >> > pass that.> >> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need!> >> >> > It> >> >> > becomes too old before the next one.> >> >> >
Mike> >> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> >> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
Snow 16 April 2005 20:37:19 [ permanent link ]
 You might get burned on the theory of have the diagnostic tell you whats
wrong and then do the work yourself. If you live here in the Land of
"Dalton I'm dumber then rock M'ginty" (Ontario). You will need to show any
and all work was preformed by an authorized repair facility in order to meet
the cap quota. If you do $350.00 dollars of repairs on your own before the
retest and still fail that $350.00 WON"T count towards the cap (about
$550.00 IIRC).

Also that cap is good for one time only, the first time a vehicle fails it
has a repair cap and it will be granted a conditional pass (one time only)
subsequent fails the vehicle is to be fixed until it passes.

Two tests ago my 93 XJ fail, here is a breakdown of the repair charges by
Cambodian Tire.
Diagnostic $100.00
O2 sensor $ 80.00
Oil Change $ 15.00 (this was oil only)
Air/Oil/Fuel filter $50.00 (filters only)
Labour $145.00 ($60/hr)
Total $390.00

The cap was $500 as the test had been established in my area for sometime.
The Cherokee still failed the retest after all that was done. The last
thing the Tech. did before retesting was the oil change (cost about $20)
main reason he did this was the next step in the T/S was to change the cat.
$370.00 still allowed him to change the cat, $390.00 ment that repair would
put me over the cap and he couldn't do it.

I asked thenif I were to do the work (change the sensor) and return with it
would they retest it, No problem, but if it still failed I would have to
prove that a authorized shop fixed it otherwise I would still have that $500
cap, if an authorized shop fixed their charges would be deducted from the
cap total and I would have the remaining still to spend.

Snow...

"u know who" <wraithyneon@sympat­ico.ca> wrote in message
news:C908e.26607$8i­6.969093@news20.bell­global.com...> ya extortion test that's a good name for it.> it appears my egr is broken as the swivel vacuum nipple seems to be bent > and the housing of where the vacuum nipple sits is cracked and broken.>
I'm going to pay for the diagnostics test then take the recommendations > and do the work myself and keep a folder with receipts. then take it back > for the retest once I hit my limit. and also at that point I will have my > new egr and whatever else they recommend as well as my nutter bypass and 3 > ounces of acetone added to the fuel.>
On my e test they put that I have a 4.0L.> On my asm2525 test my NO ppm was 3677 timing was way to advanced limit was > 893. And curb idle test HC ppm was 325 limit was 200.reason idle to high > and mixture screws set to rich. also CO% was 1.03 missed a pass by .04>
well at least I can assume that I should pass next time as the jeep was so > out of tune. reason for being out of tune I found a bad vacuum leak and > never adjusted the carb to reflect the stopped vacuum leak.>
been so long since I played with a carbed equipped veh. and the fact that > it is also computer controlled sucks. which basically means that some of > my adjustment can be over ruled by the computer.>
alwell>
keep fingers crossed for Tuesday. diagnostic day.> the retest down the road.> not so bad cause ministry issued me real plates even though it was a > resale change of ownership. so theoretically I don't require a test till > my plate renewal.>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message > news:42607229.7E0A0­3D7@sympatico.ca...>­> Oh, you can usually clean the EGR's out. Carbon is an issue and for>> sure you need one working to pass the sniffer.>>
Mike>>
u know who wrote:>>>
hmmmmm>>> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be >>> something>>> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions>>> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister guess>>> what no longer available anywhere.>>> government sucks>>>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really >>> sucks>>> I know I still need an egr though.>>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>>> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­>> > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from>>> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.>>> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!>>> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....>>> >
Mike>>> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:>>> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>>> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­>> >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a>>> >> > Jeep>>> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the>>> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I >>> >> > think>>> >> > to>>> >> > put the directions online:>>> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be installed. >>> >> I>>> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then the>>> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the>>> >> sniff>>> >> test.>>> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result >>> >> in>>> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't >>> >> got>>> >> all>>> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out>>> >> better>>> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even >>> >> stupid ->>> >> but>>> >> true.>>> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>>> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' >>> >> > 10>>> >> > mph extra per gear.>>> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing >>> >> > will>>> >> > have to be too far back to pass.>>> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the >>> >> > ASM>>> >> > 2525 test I was told.>>> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 >>> >> > that>>> >> > I>>> >> > disabled the computer in.>>> >> >
Specs.>>> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.>>> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)>>> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.>>> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'>>> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the >>> >> > book>>> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM >>> >> > setting of>>> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. >>> >> > BTDC>>> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to >>> >> > play>>> >> > there.)>>> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.>>> >> > - Ported on the timing advance>>> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00>>> >> > rebuild kit for the test.>>> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.>>> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.>>> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>>> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>>> >> >
And 16 ppm HC>>> >> >
And 0.11% CO>>> >> >
Photo of the papers here:>>> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>>> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of >>> >> > the>>> >> > paperwork.>>> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just >>> >> > the>>> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have >>> >> > to>>> >> > pass that.>>> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! >>> >> > It>>> >> > becomes too old before the next one.>>> >> >
Mike>>> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00>>> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's>


Add comment
U Know Who 18 April 2005 07:31:04 [ permanent link ]
 hi according the to gov of Ontario emissions pamphlet.
I must have a diagnostic performed by authorized fix place.
then according to there diagnostic sheet of probable causes I can do the
repairs according to only what is on the list up to the repair cost limit. I
must keep all receipts and the diagnostic list to show as proof. but only I
or the garage that did the test can work on my car to count toward the
limit.
I would get more bang for my buck if I do the work than paying them to do
it.

so couple of questions what happens when you have spent your 450 and then go
back 2 yrs later and you fail again and the list of repairs have been done
but ya still fail. oh and what happens when parts are no longer available
from any source to fix emissions components which I have all ready run into.
carbed jeeps rarely pass emissions and if they do they are so leaned out
that ya can't drive them.
next year the Howell fuel injection set up. I have already spoken to them
and there off road kit meets regular emission requirements other than cali.
plus the increase in fuel economy will make it worth it.

so cause they put the wrong engine I should get a free re test eh well I'll
try it and see.

now I'm starting to see why the guy sold this jeep.
still not deterred though just fed up with gov.

well I will be paying 170 for diagnostics that include carb and timing
adjustments, as well as emission components check.and they have the jeep for
the entire day.
that's got to be worth something there.


"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:9bb8e.26813$8i­6.1037704@news20.bel­lglobal.com...> You might get burned on the theory of have the diagnostic tell you whats > wrong and then do the work yourself. If you live here in the Land of > "Dalton I'm dumber then rock M'ginty" (Ontario). You will need to show > any and all work was preformed by an authorized repair facility in order > to meet the cap quota. If you do $350.00 dollars of repairs on your own > before the retest and still fail that $350.00 WON"T count towards the cap > (about $550.00 IIRC).>
Also that cap is good for one time only, the first time a vehicle fails it > has a repair cap and it will be granted a conditional pass (one time only) > subsequent fails the vehicle is to be fixed until it passes.>
Two tests ago my 93 XJ fail, here is a breakdown of the repair charges by > Cambodian Tire.> Diagnostic $100.00> O2 sensor $ 80.00> Oil Change $ 15.00 (this was oil only)> Air/Oil/Fuel filter $50.00 (filters only)> Labour $145.00 ($60/hr)> Total $390.00>
The cap was $500 as the test had been established in my area for sometime. > The Cherokee still failed the retest after all that was done. The last > thing the Tech. did before retesting was the oil change (cost about $20) > main reason he did this was the next step in the T/S was to change the > cat. $370.00 still allowed him to change the cat, $390.00 ment that repair > would put me over the cap and he couldn't do it.>
I asked thenif I were to do the work (change the sensor) and return with > it would they retest it, No problem, but if it still failed I would have > to prove that a authorized shop fixed it otherwise I would still have that > $500 cap, if an authorized shop fixed their charges would be deducted from > the cap total and I would have the remaining still to spend.>
Snow...>
"u know who" <wraithyneon@sympat­ico.ca> wrote in message > news:C908e.26607$8i­6.969093@news20.bell­global.com...>> ya extortion test that's a good name for it.>> it appears my egr is broken as the swivel vacuum nipple seems to be bent >> and the housing of where the vacuum nipple sits is cracked and broken.>>
I'm going to pay for the diagnostics test then take the recommendations >> and do the work myself and keep a folder with receipts. then take it back >> for the retest once I hit my limit. and also at that point I will have my >> new egr and whatever else they recommend as well as my nutter bypass and >> 3 ounces of acetone added to the fuel.>>
On my e test they put that I have a 4.0L.>> On my asm2525 test my NO ppm was 3677 timing was way to advanced limit >> was 893. And curb idle test HC ppm was 325 limit was 200.reason idle to >> high and mixture screws set to rich. also CO% was 1.03 missed a pass by >> .04>>
well at least I can assume that I should pass next time as the jeep was >> so out of tune. reason for being out of tune I found a bad vacuum leak >> and never adjusted the carb to reflect the stopped vacuum leak.>>
been so long since I played with a carbed equipped veh. and the fact that >> it is also computer controlled sucks. which basically means that some of >> my adjustment can be over ruled by the computer.>>
alwell>>
keep fingers crossed for Tuesday. diagnostic day.>> the retest down the road.>> not so bad cause ministry issued me real plates even though it was a >> resale change of ownership. so theoretically I don't require a test till >> my plate renewal.>>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message >> news:42607229.7E0A0­3D7@sympatico.ca...>­>> Oh, you can usually clean the EGR's out. Carbon is an issue and for>>> sure you need one working to pass the sniffer.>>>
Mike>>>
u know who wrote:>>>>
hmmmmm>>>> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be >>>> something>>>> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions>>>> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister >>>> guess>>>> what no longer available anywhere.>>>> government sucks>>>>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really >>>> sucks>>>> I know I still need an egr though.>>>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>>>> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­>>> > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from>>>> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.>>>> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!>>>> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....>>>> >
Mike>>>> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:>>>> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>>>> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­>>> >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way >>>> >> > a>>>> >> > Jeep>>>> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the>>>> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I >>>> >> > think>>>> >> > to>>>> >> > put the directions online:>>>> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be >>>> >> installed. I>>>> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then >>>> >> the>>>> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the>>>> >> sniff>>>> >> test.>>>> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result >>>> >> in>>>> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't >>>> >> got>>>> >> all>>>> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out>>>> >> better>>>> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even >>>> >> stupid ->>>> >> but>>>> >> true.>>>> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>>>> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' >>>> >> > 10>>>> >> > mph extra per gear.>>>> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing >>>> >> > will>>>> >> > have to be too far back to pass.>>>> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the >>>> >> > ASM>>>> >> > 2525 test I was told.>>>> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 >>>> >> > that>>>> >> > I>>>> >> > disabled the computer in.>>>> >> >
Specs.>>>> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.>>>> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)>>>> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.>>>> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'>>>> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the >>>> >> > book>>>> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM >>>> >> > setting of>>>> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. >>>> >> > BTDC>>>> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to >>>> >> > play>>>> >> > there.)>>>> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.>>>> >> > - Ported on the timing advance>>>> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00>>>> >> > rebuild kit for the test.>>>> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.>>>> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.>>>> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>>>> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>>>> >> >
And 16 ppm HC>>>> >> >
And 0.11% CO>>>> >> >
Photo of the papers here:>>>> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>>>> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo >>>> >> > of the>>>> >> > paperwork.>>>> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just >>>> >> > the>>>> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't >>>> >> > have to>>>> >> > pass that.>>>> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will >>>> >> > need! It>>>> >> > becomes too old before the next one.>>>> >> >
Mike>>>> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00>>>> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's>>


Add comment
Mike Romain 18 April 2005 17:01:33 [ permanent link ]
 Crap man, where do you live?

I am in Toronto and am home most days with more than half a clue how to
set them up for our 'Canadian' emissions pass. I can't do much work,
but I can sure still point....

My CJ7 goes like a scalded cat! It lights up my 33's too easy from a
start, I pull really fast to 50 mph in 2nd gear hitting about 4400 rpm,
3rd gear pulls hard up to 75 mph, 4th will bury the speedo and I have
'no' freakin' urge to find out how fast 5th will go.....

And my readings are below.

Mike

u know who wrote:>
hi according the to gov of Ontario emissions pamphlet.> I must have a diagnostic performed by authorized fix place.> then according to there diagnostic sheet of probable causes I can do the> repairs according to only what is on the list up to the repair cost limit. I> must keep all receipts and the diagnostic list to show as proof. but only I> or the garage that did the test can work on my car to count toward the> limit.> I would get more bang for my buck if I do the work than paying them to do> it.>
so couple of questions what happens when you have spent your 450 and then go> back 2 yrs later and you fail again and the list of repairs have been done> but ya still fail. oh and what happens when parts are no longer available> from any source to fix emissions components which I have all ready run into.> carbed jeeps rarely pass emissions and if they do they are so leaned out> that ya can't drive them.> next year the Howell fuel injection set up. I have already spoken to them> and there off road kit meets regular emission requirements other than cali.> plus the increase in fuel economy will make it worth it.>
so cause they put the wrong engine I should get a free re test eh well I'll> try it and see.>
now I'm starting to see why the guy sold this jeep.> still not deterred though just fed up with gov.>
well I will be paying 170 for diagnostics that include carb and timing> adjustments, as well as emission components check.and they have the jeep for> the entire day.> that's got to be worth something there.>
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> news:9bb8e.26813$8i­6.1037704@news20.bel­lglobal.com...> > You might get burned on the theory of have the diagnostic tell you whats> > wrong and then do the work yourself. If you live here in the Land of> > "Dalton I'm dumber then rock M'ginty" (Ontario). You will need to show> > any and all work was preformed by an authorized repair facility in order> > to meet the cap quota. If you do $350.00 dollars of repairs on your own> > before the retest and still fail that $350.00 WON"T count towards the cap> > (about $550.00 IIRC).> >
Also that cap is good for one time only, the first time a vehicle fails it> > has a repair cap and it will be granted a conditional pass (one time only)> > subsequent fails the vehicle is to be fixed until it passes.> >
Two tests ago my 93 XJ fail, here is a breakdown of the repair charges by> > Cambodian Tire.> > Diagnostic $100.00> > O2 sensor $ 80.00> > Oil Change $ 15.00 (this was oil only)> > Air/Oil/Fuel filter $50.00 (filters only)> > Labour $145.00 ($60/hr)> > Total $390.00> >
The cap was $500 as the test had been established in my area for sometime.> > The Cherokee still failed the retest after all that was done. The last> > thing the Tech. did before retesting was the oil change (cost about $20)> > main reason he did this was the next step in the T/S was to change the> > cat. $370.00 still allowed him to change the cat, $390.00 ment that repair> > would put me over the cap and he couldn't do it.> >
I asked thenif I were to do the work (change the sensor) and return with> > it would they retest it, No problem, but if it still failed I would have> > to prove that a authorized shop fixed it otherwise I would still have that> > $500 cap, if an authorized shop fixed their charges would be deducted from> > the cap total and I would have the remaining still to spend.> >
Snow...> >
"u know who" <wraithyneon@sympat­ico.ca> wrote in message> > news:C908e.26607$8i­6.969093@news20.bell­global.com...> >> ya extortion test that's a good name for it.> >> it appears my egr is broken as the swivel vacuum nipple seems to be bent> >> and the housing of where the vacuum nipple sits is cracked and broken.> >>
I'm going to pay for the diagnostics test then take the recommendations> >> and do the work myself and keep a folder with receipts. then take it back> >> for the retest once I hit my limit. and also at that point I will have my> >> new egr and whatever else they recommend as well as my nutter bypass and> >> 3 ounces of acetone added to the fuel.> >>
On my e test they put that I have a 4.0L.> >> On my asm2525 test my NO ppm was 3677 timing was way to advanced limit> >> was 893. And curb idle test HC ppm was 325 limit was 200.reason idle to> >> high and mixture screws set to rich. also CO% was 1.03 missed a pass by> >> .04> >>
well at least I can assume that I should pass next time as the jeep was> >> so out of tune. reason for being out of tune I found a bad vacuum leak> >> and never adjusted the carb to reflect the stopped vacuum leak.> >>
been so long since I played with a carbed equipped veh. and the fact that> >> it is also computer controlled sucks. which basically means that some of> >> my adjustment can be over ruled by the computer.> >>
alwell> >>
keep fingers crossed for Tuesday. diagnostic day.> >> the retest down the road.> >> not so bad cause ministry issued me real plates even though it was a> >> resale change of ownership. so theoretically I don't require a test till> >> my plate renewal.> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> >> news:42607229.7E0A0­3D7@sympatico.ca...>­ >>> Oh, you can usually clean the EGR's out. Carbon is an issue and for> >>> sure you need one working to pass the sniffer.> >>>
Mike> >>>
u know who wrote:> >>>>
hmmmmm> >>>> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be> >>>> something> >>>> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions> >>>> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister> >>>> guess> >>>> what no longer available anywhere.> >>>> government sucks> >>>>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really> >>>> sucks> >>>> I know I still need an egr though.> >>>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> >>>> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­ >>>> > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires from> >>>> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.> >>>> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!> >>>> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....> >>>> >
Mike> >>>> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:> >>>> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> >>>> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ >>>> >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way> >>>> >> > a> >>>> >> > Jeep> >>>> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> >>>> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I> >>>> >> > think> >>>> >> > to> >>>> >> > put the directions online:> >>>> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be> >>>> >> installed. I> >>>> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then> >>>> >> the> >>>> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before the> >>>> >> sniff> >>>> >> test.> >>>> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably result> >>>> >> in> >>>> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system hasn't> >>>> >> got> >>>> >> all> >>>> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit out> >>>> >> better> >>>> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even> >>>> >> stupid -> >>>> >> but> >>>> >> true.> >>>> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm> >>>> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy'> >>>> >> > 10> >>>> >> > mph extra per gear.> >>>> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing> >>>> >> > will> >>>> >> > have to be too far back to pass.> >>>> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the> >>>> >> > ASM> >>>> >> > 2525 test I was told.> >>>> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7> >>>> >> > that> >>>> >> > I> >>>> >> > disabled the computer in.> >>>> >> >
Specs.> >>>> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> >>>> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> >>>> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> >>>> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'> >>>> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the> >>>> >> > book> >>>> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM> >>>> >> > setting of> >>>> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg.> >>>> >> > BTDC> >>>> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to> >>>> >> > play> >>>> >> > there.)> >>>> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.> >>>> >> > - Ported on the timing advance> >>>> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> >>>> >> > rebuild kit for the test.> >>>> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> >>>> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> >>>> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway> >>>> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.> >>>> >> >
And 16 ppm HC> >>>> >> >
And 0.11% CO> >>>> >> >
Photo of the papers here:> >>>> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87> >>>> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo> >>>> >> > of the> >>>> >> > paperwork.> >>>> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just> >>>> >> > the> >>>> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't> >>>> >> > have to> >>>> >> > pass that.> >>>> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will> >>>> >> > need! It> >>>> >> > becomes too old before the next one.> >>>> >> >
Mike> >>>> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> >>>> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's> >>
Add comment
Snow 18 April 2005 17:30:03 [ permanent link ]
 
so couple of questions what happens when you have spent your 450 and then > go back 2 yrs later and you fail again and the list of repairs have been > done but ya still fail. oh and what happens when parts are no longer > available from any source to fix emissions components which I have all > ready run into.> carbed jeeps rarely pass emissions and if they do they are so leaned out > that ya can't drive them.

If it fails two years later it all has to be fixed again. If it managed a
conditional pass the previous year it HAS to pass and has no cap (just like
it does when you purchase a used vehicle). You might get more bang for your
buck doing the work yourself (going by the dianostic, and keeping the
receipts) but your time will be worth ZERO of the cap. sometimes labour
costs can be the savior on the cap.

As for non available parts, well if you change out the engine for either an
engine that never exsisted in that vehicle (i.e. put a 305 into your jeep)
or you install an engine no longer produced for that vehicle and no longer
produced by the car maker (i.e. putting a 283 into a 1993 gmc truck) you
will be tested as a hotrod.

Snow...



Add comment
Mike Romain 18 April 2005 18:02:46 [ permanent link ]
 Snow wrote:>
so couple of questions what happens when you have spent your 450 and then> > go back 2 yrs later and you fail again and the list of repairs have been> > done but ya still fail. oh and what happens when parts are no longer> > available from any source to fix emissions components which I have all> > ready run into.> > carbed jeeps rarely pass emissions and if they do they are so leaned out> > that ya can't drive them.>
If it fails two years later it all has to be fixed again. If it managed a> conditional pass the previous year it HAS to pass and has no cap (just like> it does when you purchase a used vehicle). You might get more bang for your> buck doing the work yourself (going by the dianostic, and keeping the> receipts) but your time will be worth ZERO of the cap. sometimes labour> costs can be the savior on the cap.>
As for non available parts, well if you change out the engine for either an> engine that never exsisted in that vehicle (i.e. put a 305 into your jeep)> or you install an engine no longer produced for that vehicle and no longer> produced by the car maker (i.e. putting a 283 into a 1993 gmc truck) you> will be tested as a hotrod.>
Snow...

For the 'hot rod' test, you now have to go to a $tealer and get a letter
stating the engine you have was never used in your vehicle or have the
test done at the $tealer so they just know this.

Places like Canadian Tire require the letter now they told me.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
Snow 18 April 2005 20:32:01 [ permanent link ]
 
For the 'hot rod' test, you now have to go to a $tealer and get a letter> stating the engine you have was never used in your vehicle or have the> test done at the $tealer so they just know this.>
Places like Canadian Tire require the letter now they told me.

That's not much of a problem, Most stealerships should know what engines
were used in what cars during which years.
Also the engine has to be out of production in the year the vehicle was
made. If you place a 350 engine (from an 88 vette) into your 92 Blazer you
won't be tested as a hotrod, you will be tested as a 350 engine and have to
pass 1992 350 emissions due to the 350 still being a production engine in
1992. If you install a 283 into the same vehicle you will get the hotrod
test as that engine was last produced in 1967 (?) or so.

If you install an engine (say 350 again) into a ford, dodge or jeep you will
be tested as a hotrod as (for the most part in the last 20 yrs.) Jeep hasn't
used the GM 350.

Another way people try to beat the smoggers is to install a newer engine
then whats in their vehicle, swap out their 1990 4.0 for a 1998, in this
case the test is still done to 1990 standards (unless you shoot your mouth
off at the testing facility).

Snow ... think I'll install a 283 in the 89 Caprice wagon for hotrod
status .. lol


Add comment
Mike Romain 18 April 2005 20:39:32 [ permanent link ]
 Snow wrote:>
For the 'hot rod' test, you now have to go to a $tealer and get a letter> > stating the engine you have was never used in your vehicle or have the> > test done at the $tealer so they just know this.> >
Places like Canadian Tire require the letter now they told me.>
That's not much of a problem, Most stealerships should know what engines> were used in what cars during which years.> Also the engine has to be out of production in the year the vehicle was> made. If you place a 350 engine (from an 88 vette) into your 92 Blazer you> won't be tested as a hotrod, you will be tested as a 350 engine and have to> pass 1992 350 emissions due to the 350 still being a production engine in> 1992. If you install a 283 into the same vehicle you will get the hotrod> test as that engine was last produced in 1967 (?) or so.>
If you install an engine (say 350 again) into a ford, dodge or jeep you will> be tested as a hotrod as (for the most part in the last 20 yrs.) Jeep hasn't> used the GM 350.>
Another way people try to beat the smoggers is to install a newer engine> then whats in their vehicle, swap out their 1990 4.0 for a 1998, in this> case the test is still done to 1990 standards (unless you shoot your mouth> off at the testing facility).>
Snow ... think I'll install a 283 in the 89 Caprice wagon for hotrod> status .. lol

Yup, I got the hot rod status for my first test, but then they figured
out a 258 was a 258 no matter if it came with a 1 bbl with no emissions
or a 2 bbl with a computer so I had to pass the real test for the 86
CJ7.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
U Know Who 19 April 2005 03:44:44 [ permanent link ]
 I'm in Kingston 3.5 hrs east of t.o

well i know my jeep doesn't go that fast.
feels like it could with some tuning but right now it can't.

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:4263AFAD.5C0E9­B9E@sympatico.ca...>­ Crap man, where do you live?>
I am in Toronto and am home most days with more than half a clue how to> set them up for our 'Canadian' emissions pass. I can't do much work,> but I can sure still point....>
My CJ7 goes like a scalded cat! It lights up my 33's too easy from a> start, I pull really fast to 50 mph in 2nd gear hitting about 4400 rpm,> 3rd gear pulls hard up to 75 mph, 4th will bury the speedo and I have> 'no' freakin' urge to find out how fast 5th will go.....>
And my readings are below.>
Mike>
u know who wrote:>>
hi according the to gov of Ontario emissions pamphlet.>> I must have a diagnostic performed by authorized fix place.>> then according to there diagnostic sheet of probable causes I can do the>> repairs according to only what is on the list up to the repair cost >> limit. I>> must keep all receipts and the diagnostic list to show as proof. but only >> I>> or the garage that did the test can work on my car to count toward the>> limit.>> I would get more bang for my buck if I do the work than paying them to do>> it.>>
so couple of questions what happens when you have spent your 450 and then >> go>> back 2 yrs later and you fail again and the list of repairs have been >> done>> but ya still fail. oh and what happens when parts are no longer >> available>> from any source to fix emissions components which I have all ready run >> into.>> carbed jeeps rarely pass emissions and if they do they are so leaned out>> that ya can't drive them.>> next year the Howell fuel injection set up. I have already spoken to them>> and there off road kit meets regular emission requirements other than >> cali.>> plus the increase in fuel economy will make it worth it.>>
so cause they put the wrong engine I should get a free re test eh well >> I'll>> try it and see.>>
now I'm starting to see why the guy sold this jeep.>> still not deterred though just fed up with gov.>>
well I will be paying 170 for diagnostics that include carb and timing>> adjustments, as well as emission components check.and they have the jeep >> for>> the entire day.>> that's got to be worth something there.>>
"Snow" <snowbal@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> news:9bb8e.26813$8i­6.1037704@news20.bel­lglobal.com...>> > You might get burned on the theory of have the diagnostic tell you >> > whats>> > wrong and then do the work yourself. If you live here in the Land of>> > "Dalton I'm dumber then rock M'ginty" (Ontario). You will need to >> > show>> > any and all work was preformed by an authorized repair facility in >> > order>> > to meet the cap quota. If you do $350.00 dollars of repairs on your >> > own>> > before the retest and still fail that $350.00 WON"T count towards the >> > cap>> > (about $550.00 IIRC).>> >
Also that cap is good for one time only, the first time a vehicle fails >> > it>> > has a repair cap and it will be granted a conditional pass (one time >> > only)>> > subsequent fails the vehicle is to be fixed until it passes.>> >
Two tests ago my 93 XJ fail, here is a breakdown of the repair charges >> > by>> > Cambodian Tire.>> > Diagnostic $100.00>> > O2 sensor $ 80.00>> > Oil Change $ 15.00 (this was oil only)>> > Air/Oil/Fuel filter $50.00 (filters only)>> > Labour $145.00 ($60/hr)>> > Total $390.00>> >
The cap was $500 as the test had been established in my area for >> > sometime.>> > The Cherokee still failed the retest after all that was done. The last>> > thing the Tech. did before retesting was the oil change (cost about >> > $20)>> > main reason he did this was the next step in the T/S was to change the>> > cat. $370.00 still allowed him to change the cat, $390.00 ment that >> > repair>> > would put me over the cap and he couldn't do it.>> >
I asked thenif I were to do the work (change the sensor) and return >> > with>> > it would they retest it, No problem, but if it still failed I would >> > have>> > to prove that a authorized shop fixed it otherwise I would still have >> > that>> > $500 cap, if an authorized shop fixed their charges would be deducted >> > from>> > the cap total and I would have the remaining still to spend.>> >
Snow...>> >
"u know who" <wraithyneon@sympat­ico.ca> wrote in message>> > news:C908e.26607$8i­6.969093@news20.bell­global.com...>> >> ya extortion test that's a good name for it.>> >> it appears my egr is broken as the swivel vacuum nipple seems to be >> >> bent>> >> and the housing of where the vacuum nipple sits is cracked and broken.>> >>
I'm going to pay for the diagnostics test then take the >> >> recommendations>> >> and do the work myself and keep a folder with receipts. then take it >> >> back>> >> for the retest once I hit my limit. and also at that point I will have >> >> my>> >> new egr and whatever else they recommend as well as my nutter bypass >> >> and>> >> 3 ounces of acetone added to the fuel.>> >>
On my e test they put that I have a 4.0L.>> >> On my asm2525 test my NO ppm was 3677 timing was way to advanced limit>> >> was 893. And curb idle test HC ppm was 325 limit was 200.reason idle >> >> to>> >> high and mixture screws set to rich. also CO% was 1.03 missed a pass >> >> by>> >> .04>> >>
well at least I can assume that I should pass next time as the jeep >> >> was>> >> so out of tune. reason for being out of tune I found a bad vacuum leak>> >> and never adjusted the carb to reflect the stopped vacuum leak.>> >>
been so long since I played with a carbed equipped veh. and the fact >> >> that>> >> it is also computer controlled sucks. which basically means that some >> >> of>> >> my adjustment can be over ruled by the computer.>> >>
alwell>> >>
keep fingers crossed for Tuesday. diagnostic day.>> >> the retest down the road.>> >> not so bad cause ministry issued me real plates even though it was a>> >> resale change of ownership. so theoretically I don't require a test >> >> till>> >> my plate renewal.>> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> >> news:42607229.7E0A0­3D7@sympatico.ca...>­> >>> Oh, you can usually clean the EGR's out. Carbon is an issue and for>> >>> sure you need one working to pass the sniffer.>> >>>
Mike>> >>>
u know who wrote:>> >>>>
hmmmmm>> >>>> I read the nutter instructions sounds like this will have to be>> >>>> something>> >>>> that I will have to do to my 89yj as it will not pass emissions>> >>>> the sad part is it was recommended that I may need a evap canister>> >>>> guess>> >>>> what no longer available anywhere.>> >>>> government sucks>> >>>>
if I fail then 450$ conditional pass, then 650$ ever 2 years really>> >>>> sucks>> >>>> I know I still need an egr though.>> >>>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> >>>> news:42605772.F0571­EA0@sympatico.ca...>­> >>>> > All the junk can be left in place. It only requires 2 new wires >> >>>> > from>> >>>> > the ignition module to the distributor that fit inside the loom.>> >>>> >
You then just set the carb mix and timing. That's it!>> >>>> >
If you have to put it back, it is only 2 wires to change.....>> >>>> >
Mike>> >>>> >
Jeff Strickland wrote:>> >>>> >>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> >>>> >> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­> >>>> >> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no >> >>>> >> > way>> >>>> >> > a>> >>>> >> > Jeep>> >>>> >> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the>> >>>> >> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I>> >>>> >> > think>> >>>> >> > to>> >>>> >> > put the directions online:>> >>>> >> >
The problem is, in Calif., the system has to physically be>> >>>> >> installed. I>> >>>> >> don't know what the bypass entails, but if stuff is removed, then>> >>>> >> the>> >>>> >> vehicle fails because of the visual inspection that comes before >> >>>> >> the>> >>>> >> sniff>> >>>> >> test.>> >>>> >>
There is considerable irony here, the bypass can conceivably >> >>>> >> result>> >>>> >> in>> >>>> >> better performance with the sniffer, but because the system >> >>>> >> hasn't>> >>>> >> got>> >>>> >> all>> >>>> >> of the components, it automatically fails. The vehicle can spit >> >>>> >> out>> >>>> >> better>> >>>> >> numbers, but if the parts are missing, it will fail. Sad - even>> >>>> >> stupid ->> >>>> >> but>> >>>> >> true.>> >>>> >>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>> >>>> >> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an >> >>>> >> > 'easy'>> >>>> >> > 10>> >>>> >> > mph extra per gear.>> >>>> >> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing>> >>>> >> > will>> >>>> >> > have to be too far back to pass.>> >>>> >> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on >> >>>> >> > the>> >>>> >> > ASM>> >>>> >> > 2525 test I was told.>> >>>> >> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 >> >>>> >> > CJ7>> >>>> >> > that>> >>>> >> > I>> >>>> >> > disabled the computer in.>> >>>> >> >
Specs.>> >>>> >> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.>> >>>> >> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)>> >>>> >> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.>> >>>> >> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'>> >>>> >> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like >> >>>> >> > the>> >>>> >> > book>> >>>> >> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM>> >>>> >> > setting of>> >>>> >> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 >> >>>> >> > deg.>> >>>> >> > BTDC>> >>>> >> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to>> >>>> >> > play>> >>>> >> > there.)>> >>>> >> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.>> >>>> >> > - Ported on the timing advance>> >>>> >> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh >> >>>> >> > $20.00>> >>>> >> > rebuild kit for the test.>> >>>> >> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM >> >>>> >> > wires.>> >>>> >> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.>> >>>> >> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>> >>>> >> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>> >>>> >> >
And 16 ppm HC>> >>>> >> >
And 0.11% CO>> >>>> >> >
Photo of the papers here:>> >>>> >> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>> >>>> >> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG >> >>>> >> > photo>> >>>> >> > of the>> >>>> >> > paperwork.>> >>>> >> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was >> >>>> >> > just>> >>>> >> > the>> >>>> >> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't>> >>>> >> > have to>> >>>> >> > pass that.>> >>>> >> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will>> >>>> >> > need! It>> >>>> >> > becomes too old before the next one.>> >>>> >> >
Mike>> >>>> >> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00>> >>>> >> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's>> >>


Add comment
U Know Who 19 April 2005 03:59:32 [ permanent link ]
 next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate
with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?

all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a
black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.

obviously to rich. lots of carbon.

well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and
hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.
but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how
that goes by with the shop owner.
that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is
a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them
this stuff.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep> with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to> put the directions online:>
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> mph extra per gear.>
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> have to be too far back to pass.>
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> 2525 test I was told.>
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> I> disabled the computer in.>
Specs.>
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> - No computer, 'Nuttered'> - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> there.)> - 92 octane ESSO gas.> - Ported on the timing advance> - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> rebuild kit for the test.> - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>
And 16 ppm HC>
And 0.11% CO>
Photo of the papers here:> http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> paperwork.>
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> pass that.>
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> becomes too old before the next one.>
Mike> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


Add comment
Mike Romain 19 April 2005 16:34:27 [ permanent link ]
 Good luck, please let us know.

My 86 will no longer have to pass any more tests! The next one is due
in 2007 and it will be over 20 years old then.

Mike

u know who wrote:>
next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?>
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear a> black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.>
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.>
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work and> hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see how> that goes by with the shop owner.> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it is> a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them> this stuff.> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­ > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a Jeep> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think to> > put the directions online:> >
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10> > mph extra per gear.> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will> > have to be too far back to pass.> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM> > 2525 test I was told.> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that> > I> > disabled the computer in.> >
Specs.> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play> > there.)> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.> > - Ported on the timing advance> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00> > rebuild kit for the test.> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.> >
And 16 ppm HC> >
And 0.11% CO> >
Photo of the papers here:> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the> > paperwork.> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to> > pass that.> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It> > becomes too old before the next one.> >
Mike> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Add comment
Mike Romain 19 April 2005 16:39:50 [ permanent link ]
 You should come meet us on our camping runs, We wheel just north of
Kingston in the Bon Echo Park area and if you spent a couple days with
some notice I could bring my tune up tools along and we could spend an
afternoon by the lake fishing with a couple cold ones while tweaking up
the old 4.2...

I have to/should stop by Kingston soon anyway, the gent that built my
CJ7's 'glass body lives there and he offered to help me fix the crack
that happened when I rolled her.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

u know who wrote:>
I'm in Kingston 3.5 hrs east of t.o>
well i know my jeep doesn't go that fast.> feels like it could with some tuning but right now it can't.>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message> news:4263AFAD.5C0E9­B9E@sympatico.ca...>­ > Crap man, where do you live?> >
I am in Toronto and am home most days with more than half a clue how to> > set them up for our 'Canadian' emissions pass. I can't do much work,> > but I can sure still point....> >
My CJ7 goes like a scalded cat! It lights up my 33's too easy from a> > start, I pull really fast to 50 mph in 2nd gear hitting about 4400 rpm,> > 3rd gear pulls hard up to 75 mph, 4th will bury the speedo and I have> > 'no' freakin' urge to find out how fast 5th will go.....> >
Add comment
U Know Who 19 April 2005 18:19:15 [ permanent link ]
 sounds like a good idea
really so your body guy is in Kingston eh that's kewl
ya forsure hookin up to tune up would be kewl.

hey if ya use msn add me
wraithyneon@hotmail­.com
.
.
.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:4264FC16.C8DB8­87A@sympatico.ca...>­ You should come meet us on our camping runs, We wheel just north of> Kingston in the Bon Echo Park area and if you spent a couple days with> some notice I could bring my tune up tools along and we could spend an> afternoon by the lake fishing with a couple cold ones while tweaking up> the old 4.2...>
I have to/should stop by Kingston soon anyway, the gent that built my> CJ7's 'glass body lives there and he offered to help me fix the crack> that happened when I rolled her.>
Mike> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's>
u know who wrote:>>
I'm in Kingston 3.5 hrs east of t.o>>
well i know my jeep doesn't go that fast.>> feels like it could with some tuning but right now it can't.>>
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> news:4263AFAD.5C0E9­B9E@sympatico.ca...>­> > Crap man, where do you live?>> >
I am in Toronto and am home most days with more than half a clue how to>> > set them up for our 'Canadian' emissions pass. I can't do much work,>> > but I can sure still point....>> >
My CJ7 goes like a scalded cat! It lights up my 33's too easy from a>> > start, I pull really fast to 50 mph in 2nd gear hitting about 4400 rpm,>> > 3rd gear pulls hard up to 75 mph, 4th will bury the speedo and I have>> > 'no' freakin' urge to find out how fast 5th will go.....>> >


Add comment


U Know Who 19 April 2005 18:53:44 [ permanent link ]
 well took to shop and then got a call 2 hrs later.
the hard drive in the dyno gave out.
only a certified tech can gain entry to the cabinet for the dyno so my
appointment has been reset for Monday nest week.
also after discussing it with tech and him discussing with another tech they
are going to do a do over with my test as they as certain that the standards
are different. between 4.0L and 4.2L that will be in my advantage (do over
is free).
so the saga continues.

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message
news:4264FAD3.BDE7F­08F@sympatico.ca...>­ Good luck, please let us know.>
My 86 will no longer have to pass any more tests! The next one is due> in 2007 and it will be over 20 years old then.>
Mike>
u know who wrote:>>
next question it the test start for 86 and on vehicles or does it rotate>> with time. as in 19 yrs back from the current year?>>
all I know is if I run my jeep parked in the same spot there will appear >> a>> black mark on the pavement where the exhaust is.>>
obviously to rich. lots of carbon.>>
well tomorrow Tuesday is the day.... guess I will let them do the work >> and>> hit the cap. sounds like the best idea.>> but first that free redo on the test as they have my motor as a 4.0L see >> how>> that goes by with the shop owner.>> that is the third mechanic that I have had to fight with when stating it >> is>> a 4.2L gesh what is up with mechanics they have computers that tell them>> this stuff.>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.­ca> wrote in message>> news:42604598.8FE80­D28@sympatico.ca...>­> > Well after arguing myself blue with a 'mechanic' that says no way a >> > Jeep>> > with a carb can pass emissions in California if you disable the>> > emissions computer or do a 'Nutter' on it after the first guy I think >> > to>> > put the directions online:>> >
http://www.off-road­.com/jeep/jnutter1.h­tm>> >
It gives a sweet 25% 'seat of the pants' power boost and an 'easy' 10>> > mph extra per gear.>> >
The mechanic's reasoning is the NOx will blow out or the timing will>> > have to be too far back to pass.>> >
The Jeep numbers for an 89 YJ 4.2 in California are 875 NOx on the ASM>> > 2525 test I was told.>> >
I found my 2003 ASM 2525 emissions papers for my Canadian 1986 CJ7 that>> > I>> > disabled the computer in.>> >
Specs.>> >
- 1986 Canadian CJ7 4.2L, Likely 60,000 original miles on it.>> > - 'No' Catalytic converter (not needed in Canada)>> > - 2" straight pipe with a high flow Dynomax turbo muffler.>> > - No computer, 'Nuttered'>> > - Base timing set at 9 deg BTDC with the vacuum line off like the book>> > says for a non computer engine. (If I go with the higher RPM setting of>> > full advance the sticker on a YJ says, I end up with 6 or 7 deg. BTDC>> > base and I find that too boggy for power so I even have room to play>> > there.)>> > - 92 octane ESSO gas.>> > - Ported on the timing advance>> > - Stock BBD carb set to 'best lean idle' and always a fresh $20.00>> > rebuild kit for the test.>> > - Accel Supercoil for hot spark with Champion plugs and OEM wires.>> > - Strong pull up to 4400 rpm, then falls flat.>> > - 11L/100km or something like 23 US mpg highway>> >
On the ASM 2525 test I got 589 NOx!!!!!.>> >
And 16 ppm HC>> >
And 0.11% CO>> >
Photo of the papers here:>> > http://www.imagesta­tion.com/album/pictu­res.html?id=42906369­87>> >
And a post on alt.binaries.pictur­es.autos.4x4 with the JPG photo of the>> > paperwork.>> >
Not a fluke, I killed the computer in 2000, this 2003 one was just the>> > only year they actually put the NOx reading on because I don't have to>> > pass that.>> >
And the best part is I have passed the last test it ever will need! It>> > becomes too old before the next one.>> >
Mike>> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00>> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..

CarGuru > Jeep Willys > 1986 'Nuttered' CJ7 4.2L Canadian Emissions Data 19 April 2005 18:53:44
see also:
ASA: Riverside Speedway re-joins Member…
ALMS: Butch Leitzinger - ALMS interview
pass tests:
see also:
buick 3800 engin
'07 VW Rabbit Air Conditioning
starting issue, 2002 dodge caravan
  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .