Wednesday, 21 May 2008
|
| todays chump parade Borked Pseudo Mailed 07:59:27 |
| | what happened to the english pig? 7 laps down
oink oink
|
| | Add comment |
Friday, 22 February 2008
|
| Danica's Pre-season Statistics Tom2000 02:42:08 |
| |
No, not boring pre-season testing stats. The important ones: Sports
Illustrated's swimsuit issue stats.
- Swimsuit photos of Danica Patrick: 5.
- Topless photos of Danica Patrick: 2 (we think -- it appears she is
wearing nothing in the final shot, but she's hidden by a pillow).
- Photos of Danica Patrick in bed: 1.
- Full-page ads with Danica Patrick: 3.
- Total pages devoted to Danica Patrick: 8.
Per Jim Caple:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=caple/080220&sportCat=mlb
|
| |  6 answers | Add comment |
Thursday, 21 February 2008
|
| Remaining Newsgiup JohnW-Mpls 07:50:29 |
| |
SO- which newsgroup will we retain - CART or Indy?
--
JohnW-Mpls
|
| | 4 answer | Add comment |
Monday, 11 February 2008
|
| Momento John Everett 16:35:48 |
| |
A short story and a question.
Many years ago a group of us from the Boston area traveled to New York
for a Road Racing Driver's Club seminar being held in conjunction the
New York Auto Show at the Coliseum on Columbus Circle. While wandering
the show before the seminar was to begin we happened upon Peter Revson
in one of the trade booths. He was autographing postcard sized photos
of him with his previous year's Indy car, but when he found out we
were fellow racers he chatted with us while he handed out the signed
photos.
Revson's picture was on one side and Mark Donohue's was on the other.
Peter gave each of us a signed picture and told us to make Donohue
sign the other side. He said if he had to stand around giving out
autographs we ought to make Donohue do some work too. The main feature
of the RRDC seminar was to be a talk by Donohue on car preparation.
Meanwhile I had developed a killer headache (which at the time I
didn't identify as caffeine withdrawal), and excused myself to go look
for a couple of aspirins. I wandered around and finally found the
meeting hall where a Coliseum worker and Donohue were setting up for
the seminar. I asked the Coliseum guy if he knew where I could find
some aspirin, but Mark said he had some in his briefcase. I mentioned
I was there for the seminar and when he opened the briefcase, along
with the bottle of Bayer he pulled out a couple of 8 x 10 glossies of
his new car the that year's Indy 500. It was the then new wedge-shaped
McLaren that Revson put on the pole that year (1971) with Donohue next
to him on the front row. Mark was obviously very enthusiastic about
the car, but I was thinking (quite wrongly), "yeah...right."
Anyway I had the picture in my pocket so I said, "Revson said I had to
make you sign the other side of this." So Mark signed it for me.
So I still have the autographed card, Revson on one side and Donohue
on the other. I'm wondering if it has any value. Do race fans collect
this kind of memorabilia like other sports fans do?
--
jeverett3<AT>sbcglobal<DOT>net (John V. Everett)
|
| | 8 answers | Add comment |
Friday, 8 February 2008
|
| Beavers Bill Clark 03:17:35 |
| | Anyone seen Danica's commercial that Fox supposedly would not air?
Anyone think that there will be any disucssion about "conduct detrimental to
the Leauge"?
I doubt it.
|
| | Add comment |
Tuesday, 29 January 2008
|
| Re: The Week in Review 6andretti 16:04:29 |
| | On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:50:19 -0800 (PST), scottscottscott
<scottrevision@yahoo.com> wrote:
Presented by the Not Ready for Big League Players: <curtain> Man: "It could be the solution! Tony is extending the olive branch! He's like Grant at Appomattox! Fierce in war, first in peace! He may look stupid, but that's just a disguise! The IRL and open wheel have a chance. Sure, it looked like a murder/suicide pact, but this could be the answer. Thank God he's getting personally involved in breaking the deadlock!" Tony: "I didn't do that, and I wouldn't have done that, and I won't do that, and it's too late now, anyway." Man: "Um..." </curtain>
LOL, except for a plethora of 'um's' and 'ah's' from TG hisownself,
likely not far off.
|
| | Add comment |
Sunday, 20 January 2008
Tuesday, 1 January 2008
|
| Re: Poll: What Exact Event Marked the Ultimate Decline of ABC Sports 6andretti 06:23:19 |
| | On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:06:43 -0800 (PST), TMC1982@gmail.com wrote:
*Cap-Cities buying the network (circa 1985) *Disney buying the network (circa 1996) *"Wide World of Sports" in its original format, gets cancelled (circa 1997-1998) *ABC loses the rights to both Olympic Games following the 1988 Winter Games in Calgary *ABC loses "Monday Night Football" to ESPN (circa 2005-2006) *ABC loses the rights to the Triple Crown to NBC (circa 2000-2001) *Roone Arledge steps down as the president of ABC Sports (circa 1986) *Keith Jackson retires and Al Michaels moves to NBC (circa 2006) *George Bodenheimer becomes head of ABC Sports (circa 2003) *Howard Cosell gets fired (circa 1985) *Other
Putting Brent Mussberger anywhere near 16th and Georgetown for the
500.
|
| | 3 answer | Add comment |
Friday, 28 December 2007
Saturday, 15 December 2007
|
| 24 at Daytona B H 11:16:35 |
| | Roger Penske will be teaming with Wayne Taylor Racing in the 2008 24
hours of Daytona.
They will be running a Pontiac Riley for drivers
Helio Castroneves, Ryan Briscoe and Kurt
Busch.
|
| | 2 answer | Add comment |
Thursday, 13 December 2007
|
| IRL TV Schedule Von Fourche 09:24:37 |
| | Wednesday, December 12, 2007
ABC, ESPN ramp up for coverage of 2008 series schedule
By indycar.com staff
IndyCar Series Merchandise
ESPN continues its longstanding relationship with the sanctioning Indy
Racing League by providing television coverage of every IndyCar Series and
Indy Pro Series race during the 2008 season.
The 16-race IndyCar Series season, including the 92nd Indianapolis 500, will
be broadcast on ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC. The 2008 schedule, ESPN's 13th as the
IndyCar Series television partner, includes seven events each on ABC and
ESPN2 and two on ESPN. The networks also will cover Indianapolis 500
qualifying May 10-11 and 17-18. The Indy Pro Series broadcast schedule will
be announced early in 2008.
"ABC and ESPN have played a significant role in the advancement of the
IndyCar Series," said Terry Angstadt, president of the commercial division
of the Indy Racing League. "With innovations, such as side-by-side and
Sportvision, our broadcasts offer viewers a unique motorsports experience."
The IndyCar Series season begins March 29 at Homestead-Miami Speedway with a
prime-time telecast on ESPN2 at 8 p.m. (ET). The series concludes Sept. 7 at
Chicagoland Speedway at 3:30 p.m. on ABC. The 92nd running of the
Indianapolis 500 airs May 25 at noon on ABC.
The ESPN alliance dates to the IndyCar Series' inaugural 1996 event. ABC's
first telecast of the Indianapolis 500 was in 1965, a relationship that is
the second-longest in sports between a network and sports property. Only CBS
and The Masters have been together longer.
"We look forward to another exciting season of IndyCar Series racing on our
networks," said John Wildhack, ESPN executive vice president, programming
and acquisitions. "The series showed ratings growth in 2007 and we feel that
the personalities of the drivers and the close, competitive racing are
resonating with our viewers."
The 2008 IndyCar Series schedule (all times Eastern and reflect broadcast
start time)
Date Venue Network Time
March 29 Homestead-Miami Speedway ESPN2 8 p.m.
April 6 Streets of St. Petersburg ESPN 2:30 p.m.
April 19 Twin Ring Motegi, Japan ESPN Noon
April 27 Kansas Speedway ESPN2 5 p.m.
May 25 Indianapolis Motor Speedway ABC Noon
June 1 The Milwaukee Mile ABC 4 p.m.
June 7 Texas Motor Speedway ESPN2 10 p.m.
June 22 Iowa Speedway ABC 3 p.m.
June 28 Richmond International Raceway ESPN2 8 p.m.
July 6 Watkins Glen International ABC 3:30 p.m.
July 12 Nashville Superspeedway ESPN2 8 p.m.
July 20 Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course ABC 1:30 p.m.
Aug. 9 Kentucky Speedway ESPN2 6:30 p.m.
Aug. 24 Infineon Raceway ESPN2 5:30 p.m.
Aug. 31 The Raceway at Belle Isle Park ABC 3:30 p.m.
Sep. 7 Chicagoland Speedway ABC 3:30 p.m.
|
| | Add comment |
Tuesday, 11 December 2007
|
| IRL cars as slow as an L.A. freeway Bertski 22:40:12 |
| | Robin Miller says;
OPEN-WHEEL RACING BRIEFLY REUNITED
After 12 years and several failed attempts by different individuals,
the two major open wheel racing series in this country finally got
back together.
But it was only for a one-day tire test at Homestead, Fla.
Last Tuesday, the PKV team from Champ Car shared the track with the
Indy Racing League's Andretti-Green stable for a Bridgestone/Firestone
test.
Oriol Servia and AGR teammates Marco Andretti and Danica Patrick ran
together on the 2.3-mile, 11-turn road course inside Homestead-Miami
Speedway.
No official times were released but witnesses said Servia's
Panoz/Cosworth was about three seconds a lap quicker than AGR's
Dallara/Honda, mainly because of the long straightaway.
No media was allowed because, supposedly, neither sanctioning body
wanted people to read too much into this brief unification.
|
| | 1 answer | Add comment |
Thursday, 6 December 2007
|
| Re: This just in Albert D. Kallal 05:21:40 |
| |
Frankly I think he was more worried that people would think that he really hated Robin Miller than he was about the condition of open wheel racing.
Well, that just shows that TG is a chess player. We all know that giving any
credence to robin is a smack against champ car (everyone knows how RM been
body waste dumping on champs of late). So, hell, why not give RM a fig
leaf...after all, he's been helping your cause of late.
It is just like last year when many people in champs said that IRL has no
respect, or ability to move on to F1. It was not a month later that a test
in F1 was organized by Honda
Then we complied about too many ovals..and no serious road racing...not a
month later they announced a race of mid-ohio......
So, no..I don't trust the guy as far as I could throw him. You see how he
does play chess well. If there is a complaint about how the IRL is worse or
inferior to CCWS, then he takes steps to address that.....
I sure they got a new car in the works too!!!
That is how you play this dirty game. Anything that you can take away from
the enemy...you will!!!
It all abut perception. The problem is that they not delivering the
attendance numbers....
--
Albert D. Kallal
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
pleaseNOOSpamKallal@msn.com
|
| | 22 answer | Add comment |
Sunday, 2 December 2007
|
| RLR Files Suit Against Sharp, Patron Forty 20:45:51 |
| | http://www.speedtv.com/articles/auto/indycar/41828/
Rahal Letterman Racing announced Wednesday that it has filed a lawsuit
in United States District Court Southern District of Florida Miami
Division today against Scott Sharp Sports, LLC, Scott Sharp Inc., driver
Scott Sharp (collectively “Sharp”) and sponsor Patr n Spirits.
The suit alleges, among other things, a breach by Sharp of a multi-year
contract with Rahal Letterman Racing. The terms of the contract call for
Sharp and Patr n Spirits to participate in the IndyCar Series with Rahal
Letterman Racing through 2008. Rahal Letterman Racing’s suit seeks
damages for, among other things, Sharp’s breach of contract and Patr n’s
interference with contractual relations as well as injunctive relief.
Additionally, RLR will file an emergency motion for a preliminary
injunction against Scott Sharp forthwith.
“We find it deeply unfortunate that Scott Sharp Sports and Scott
personally have taken this course of action, given that they are
contractually committed with Rahal Letterman Racing through 2008,” said
team co-owner Bobby Rahal. “We have learned that Scott is interested in
racing somewhere else. If that is his direction in the future, so be it,
but not in violation of his 2008 commitments. Their attempted legal
maneuver to break the contract early is totally without merit. As such,
Rahal Letterman Racing will vigorously and aggressively pursue our
claims against Sharp and Patr n and the remedies to which we are
entitled, as well as defend our team against their unfounded
allegations. We had hoped to avoid the ramifications of legal
proceedings, but with the allegations against us becoming public record,
it is important that we act quickly and decisively to obtain judicial
intervention to protect our reputation and goodwill in the industry, as
well as to prevent any interference with our relations with our sponsors
and other business partners.”
Sharp joined Rahal Letterman Racing in 2007 with Patr n, finishing
eighth in the IndyCar Series. He scored 10 top-10 finishes, three
top-fives and won his first pole since 2001 when he led qualifying in
Texas. He also finished sixth in this year's Indianapolis 500, the best
finish of his 13 career Indy 500 starts.
--
forty
"There's a very fine line between not listening, and not caring. I like
to think that I walk that line every day of my life."
|
| | 5 answers | Add comment |
Saturday, 1 December 2007
|
| Helio? Bill Jonesi 03:04:58 |
| | Been jumping back & forth from Monaco & Indy. What happened to Helio to
put him a lap down?
|
| | 6 answers | Add comment |
|
| Re: Helio Crowned Champion Cal Vanize 02:59:29 |
| | Lenny wrote:
...on Dancing With The Stars... LOL!
At least he can dance.
|
| | 1 answer | Add comment |
Saturday, 24 November 2007
|
| MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website (11553) Guest 12:12:03 |
| |
MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website
The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the MI5
Persecution website describing it as an "excellent site". The webpages
describe in detail the nature of my persecution since 1990 by what are
believed to be elements of the UK security service.
(snip image)
You are encouraged to read the web pages which include
o a FAQ section outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods
of harassment through the media, people at work and among the general public
o an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to me
o factual descriptions of the state security agencies involved
o scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state security agencies involved
o posts which have been made to netnews over the last three years on this topic
11553
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
| | Add comment |
|
| MI5 Persecution: Why do you think MI5 are responsible? (7203) Guest 11:12:01 |
| |
Why do you think MI5 are responsible?
The question of who is ultimately responsible for this eight-year
harassment is one which is very difficult to answer, as the persecutors
have never clearly made their identities known to the persecutee. However,
I believe I am correct in attributing the continuing victimisation to
elements of the British Security Service MI5, and in this article, I will
try to explain the reasons for this belief.
The British internet magazine ".net" featured my website on page 17 of
their March 1998 issue (number 42). Their review kindly describes it as an
"excellent site" and gives some details of what the net surfer will find
there. Should you wish to reply to this article you can do so;
"When did you first suspect MI5 were responsible?"
Over Easter 1995 I went to see a local solicitor in London with a view to
talking to the police about the harassment. Soon afterwards I did go to my
local police station in Clapham and spoke to an officer there. The
solicitor made a comment which suggested to me that the persecution I had
been experiencing may have been organised by an intelligence service.
Up to this point, I did not have any clear idea as to who was behind the
harassment. Only their agents were visible, in the media, on television
news programmes, and on the radio; in the workplace, where things said at
my home were repeated verbatim; and in some cases abuse in public and
during travel, for example on the trip to Poland in June 1992 which I have
already described.
Both from the fact that widely disparate individuals and organisations
were employed as agents in the campaign against me, and from the fact that
an entity would be required to marshal their resources in the areas of
spying on my home and giving gathered information to their agents, it was
clear to me that a single entity was responsible for carrying out the
campaign. Yet from June 1990 until Easter 1995 I did not have a clear idea
of who might be responsible. I guessed that perhaps some private
individual or group of persons who saw themselves as my enemies had
perhaps paid private detectives to organise the harassment. Alternatively,
since the campaign had started in the media, I made a far-fetched
supposition that perhaps it was an ad-hoc group of media people who had
set themselves up in opposition to me. After Easter 1995 I saw that these
guesses were wrong, and I made an I believe much more accurate estimate as
to who my enemies really are.
"Why couldn't a private group be behind the persecution?"
There are several reasons why a private individual or group would not be
behind this campaign.
Quantity of resources / Money. Here is what one Usenet (internet
newsgroup) participant had to say (several years ago) on the topic of how
much money it would cost just to keep the surveillance going.
PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep
PM: >one person under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about
PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a
PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would
PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more
like
PM: >#30,000 to the employer.)
PM: >
PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the
PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved. And
PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big Boss'
PM: >would listen to hours and hours of tapes, do you.
PM: >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much less than
PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you doing that
makes
PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter
million
PM: >on you?
A private individual or group would not spend over a million pounds to
verbally torture a victim without some financial motive or gain. Private
industry is driven by the profit motive, and there is no financial profit
to be had from carrying out a campaign in this way. If a private
enterprise were behind it then they would have taken direct physical
action a long time ago.
State enterprises, on the other hand, can afford to be wasteful, since
they are funded by the taxpayer. They do not have to show a money
profit. The employees or contractors employed by a state organisation such
as MI5 are driven by their own personal profit motives, to make the most
money out of their employers for the longest period of time. MI5 is funded
to the tune of #150M p.a.; even a few hundred thousand a year would to
them be affordable if their managers could convince themselves of the
necessity of what they were doing.
Quality of resources / Technical resources - electronic and other
surveillance. In summer 1994 a reputable and competent private detective
agency was employed to conduct a counter-surveillance sweep of my home in
London. They charged us over #400 for this, conducted a thorough search
for radio transmitting devices, hard-wired "probe" microphones and also
tested the telephone line. They found nothing. This was not altogether
surprising, since it had been made very clear to me that there were bugs
in my home; the "buggers" would not have made this clear unless they had
felt their bugs were of sufficient sophistication as to be safe from
detection.
But there is another lesson to be gained from the failure of the private
detectives to find anything. The agency employed was one of the most
reputable in London. They were employed on the principle of "setting a
thief to catch a thief", for if the harassment were being carried out by
private detectives, as I then believed, then surely another set of private
detectives would be able to find the bugs that they had planted. That
these "private eyes" were unable to find anything, and that the harassers
were confident that they would not be able to find any bugs, points to the
harassers being an order of sophistication above a private agency, and
leads me again to believe that a state intelligence service is responsible
for the surveillance and harassment.
Quality of resources / Technical resources - Interception of Postal
service. In summer 1994 when I emigrated to Canada to try to escape the
harassment, I wrote letters home to my family and friends in London. Quite
soon after my arrival in Canada, the harassers were able to find precisely
where I was staying. The only way I can see of "their" being able to find
out my new address was by interception of my letters to the UK.
Later in 1994, I conducted an experiment to see if my letters home were
indeed being read. In a letter home I wrote of being depressed and talked
in vague terms of suicide. I deliberately chose this topic, since I
believed it was the outcome my harassers were trying to achieve, and that
if they read the letter, they would "echo" its contents. Sure enough, soon
afterwards there were two incidents of people shouting "suicide" at me in
public places in Canada.
It is inconceivable for a private agency to have the ability to intercept
postal mail. The state security service on the other hand is well known to
engage in these activities.
Quality of resources / Access to Media. One of the strangest aspects of
this case is the access "they" have to the broadcast and print media. I
still do not understand what could persuade newscasters such as Martyn
Lewis and Michael Buerk, who consider themselves "gentlemen", to behave in
an almost voyeuristic way by "peeking" into the living room of one of
their viewers. A year ago I wrote to the BBC asking if these newscasters
would confirm or deny the accusations made against them. The BBC replied
that their newscasters had denied the accusations, but refused to do so in
writing.
It is well known that MI5 have the ability to plant stories in certain
newspapers, but convincing television newscasters to "watch" a viewer
while they read the news would surely be very difficult for them to
accomplish, unless they presented themselves to these journalists as
being, for example, a group in the media who were seeing to it that I got
my "deserved" treatment. MI5 has a history of manipulating the media, so
it might not be too difficult for them to accomplish such a trick, whereas
a private group would not have this ability.
"Have they ever denied that they are the Security Service?"
No. Never. This is in fact the main reason why I believe "they" are MI5
and not a privately funded group. If my guess had been wrong then I am
sure that "they" would have crowed over my mistake, but they have never
admitted nor denied that they are employees of MI5.
In early January 1996 I flew on a British Airways jet from London to
Montreal; also present on the plane, about three or four rows behind me,
were two young men, one of them fat and voluble, the other silent. It was
quite clear that these two had been planted on the aircraft to "wind me
up". The fat youth described the town in Poland where I had spent
Christmas, and made some unpleasant personal slurs against me. Most
interestingly, he said the words, "he doesnt know who we are".
Now I find this particular form of words very interesting, because while
it is not a clear admission, it is only a half-hearted attempt at denial
of my guess that "they" = "MI5". Had my guess been wrong, the fat youth
would surely have said so more clearly.
"If MI5 were behind it, why would they wish to mask their involvement?"
I have heard a number of times a belief from people in the media that it
is they, the media people, who are behind the abuse. In spring 1994 Chris
Tarrant the Capital Radio D.J. said sarcastically on his breakfast show,
"You know this bloke? he says were trying to kill him. We should be done
for attempted manslaughter". We, we, we. Tarrant thought it was a media
conspiracy.
Returning to the question of "interactive watching" by television
newscasters, it would again be much easier for them to take part in that
sort of activity if they convinced themselves that the surveillance and
abuse were organised by "their own", by media people. It must be second
nature to MI5 to mask their involvement in the matters they deal with; in
this case, they pretend the campaign is organised by a group in the media,
and any journalists who suspect otherwise keep their silence.
Conclusion
Over the last three years I have stated with some force my belief that MI5
are responsible for my misfortunes. I have done so on Internet newsgroups,
in letters and faxes to people in politics and the media in the UK, and in
1997 I made a formal complaint to MI5 regarding their activities; the
Security Service Tribunal replied in June 1997 that "no determination in
your favour has been made on your complaint". (I believe the statement by
the Security Service Tribunal can be disregarded, as they have never, ever
made a ruling in favour of a complainant.) In three years of naming MI5 as
my oppressor "they" have never denied the charge. To me, their silence on
this point indicates that my guess was accurate. I believe my persecutors
stand identified. The question of why they should carry out this campaign
is one I will try to answer in a future article.
7203
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
| | Add comment |
|
| MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True? (5028) Guest 10:42:55 |
| |
MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True?
If you have the patience to read these articles you will be struck by how
apparently fantastic the claims being put forward are. You may ask
yourself why such seemingly nonsensical assertions are made. This matter
has been discussed on the Internets UK-local newsgroups for three years
now, and the denizens of the uk.misc newsgroup (the so-called
"miscreants") have come up with a number of theories to explain these
posts; it has been variously suggested that they are a troll (an
artificial creation for the amusement of its author), that they are made
by MI5 themselves with the purpose of discrediting other conspiracy
theories, and that the poster is mentally ill and the articles are
symptomatic of the illness (the view held by most miscreants).
Are these claims the product of mental illness, or is that just a cover?
The most obvious explanation, that the claims made result from the
admitted mental illness of the author, is the one which the persecutors
intend be the one accepted without consideration being given to the
possibility of the claims being true. The persecutors have actually been
very clever about this, both in selecting as their target someone who was
known from school or university as being borderline schizophrenic, and in
ensuring the nature of their persecution corresponds to what often
features in the delusions of a schizophrenic.
The very first incident of the persecution occurred in June 1990, when I
was still a student at university in London. It consisted of a reaction
(giggling) from the newsreader, Sue Carpenter of ITN, to what she saw
happening in my living-room at my parents home where I was living. Before
your imagination gets the better of you I should make clear that what the
newsreader was reacting to was not too embarrassing in nature; my mother
had brought an apple for me into the the room, and Sue Carpenter found
this amusing.
I recognized that Carpenter had reacted to what she had seen in my
living-room, yet this idea still seemed completely fantastic to me. My
reaction was to continue watching television, particularly the news, to
see if this incident would be repeated. It was, many times, both on BBC
and ITV. An intelligent person would have thought to obtain a video
recorder and capture some of these incidents in order to try to explain to
an observer what he saw in these broadcasts. Unfortunately, I failed this
test of intelligence, since I did not record these programmes. I have
recently attempted to obtain from ITN tapes of their news programmes
dating back to summer 1990, but, unhappily, they have advised me that they
do not have complete programmes including newsreaders comments dating back
to that period.
From the outset, the persecutors structured their actions to ensure that
any complaint would be met with disbelief, and dismissed as
delusional. This is why they chose as their target someone who was known
at school and university to be borderline mentally ill; and it is why they
fired the first shots of their campaign through the broadcast
media. Schizophrenics commonly believe the media harass them; it would be
exceptional for "full-duplex television" to exist in reality. Those with
schizophrenia also commonly believe people are talking about them; again,
the persecutors have shown themselves very rarely, but act through
intermediaries, both in the workplace, and in public and during travel.
Mental illness is not the cause of these claims, but the simulation of its
symptoms is a cover used by the persecutors to deny their victim the
ability to have his compaints believed.
What evidence exists to support these claims of "interactive
television/radio";?
Quite frankly, I have very little evidence to support my claims. You may
examine the "Evidence" area of my website to see such evidence as I have
been able to gather. None of it is remotely conclusive. The "smoking
guns" all date back to 1990/91, and it is really rather late now to start
trying to look for material dating back seven or eight years. In 1997 I
started tape-recording every programme I watched or listened to. I also
started carrying with me a high-fidelity minidisc-recorder with good
quality microphone to catch incidents of public harassment, but this also
has not been as successful or conclusive as I had hoped.
Perhaps the best item in the "Evidence" section is the audio file "Life is
so hard" (it is labelled with Garfield the cartoon character on the site),
which I have given a certainty level of 100%. This item relates to
harassment at my workplace in Canada in 1996. A co-worker called Mark was
coming up with phrases and expressions which were repeating things being
said at my Canadian residence, consequently leading me to believe that my
apartment and home phone were bugged, and that the persecutors were
passing their gathered information on to Mark. On one particular evening I
said in my apartment, "life is so hard, and then you die". The following
day I was able to record Mark saying exactly the same phrase at work.
Unfortunately when "they" know you are recording them, they simply dont
say things which would unambiguously show harassment. When Mark the
co-worker knew he was being recorded, he only made his remarks out of
range of the recorder, for example outside the building. When the TV
newscasters or radio disc jockeys know they are being taped, they limit
themselves to saying things which are ambiguous, which even in my mind may
or may not be personally directed against me.
Who knows about this persecution?
Surprisingly many people know. People in the media, such as BBC and ITN
newscasters including Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk, and radio disc
jockeys such as Chris Tarrant of Capital Radio, know what is going on, and
take part in it. Some co-workers at my former workplaces in England and
Canada have known about the harassment. Quite a few people in the general
public are also included. I believe the police are aware of the
persecution, but, unfortunately, have chosen not to take any action to
stop it. I have complained at my local police station in London several
years ago, and I have stated on the internet newsgroups that I have done
so, hence the police will be well aware of my wish to see the matter
resolved. I believe their inaction denotes a dereliction of duty, but
without good evidence, I am powerless to compel them to take steps to
prevent further harassment, or deal with what has already taken place.
What is the purpose of sending these faxes?
These faxes are being sent to three distinct groups of people, namely
Members of Parliament, the media, and diplomats & legal people. As you
will have observed I am making use of the email-to-fax gateway at Demon
Internet to send these faxes. I am forced to use this gateway since I
currently live in North America, and cannot afford the high cost of direct
phone calls to the UK.
My purpose in publicising my claims is firstly to discourage the
persecutors from continuing their campaign, and also to attempt to bring
their campaign out into the open, and thus perhaps identify the
persecutors. Neither aim has been achieved yet, but I hope that with
sufficient stimulation these aims may yet be accomplished.
The problem with the second aim is that those who read this article will
fall into two groups, those who dont know anything about the persecution
and consequently will disbelieve my claims as delusional, and those who do
know about the harassment and may have some idea of who is behind it, but
realise that if the harassers are exposed and the truth brought out into
the open, then powerful British institutions will substantially lose
prestige, and be exposed to ridicule.
It would give me hope to believe that these faxes will create a third
group of people, those who find out that I am telling the truth, and who
follow their consciences in standing up and seeing justice done. Only time
will tell if this hope will be realized.
5028
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
| | Add comment |
|
| MI5 Persecution: Faxes Sent to Parliament2 (2853) Guest 10:06:04 |
| | 441712192872 nyyyyyYnnnnnYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYnyyynyynnynyynyyyyy
441712192873 yyyyyyYyyyyyyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712192879 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyny
441712192905 yyyyyyYyyyynnYYYYNNNNNYYNYEYynyyynyyyyyyynyyyyy
441712192912 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEYYEEYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyyyyyyynyyyy
441712192921 nyyyyyYyynyynEYYYYYYYYYEEYNYynnnnnynnynynyyyyyy
441712192949 yyyyyyYyyynynYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynn
441712192957 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYYEYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192965 ynyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYNYYYYYyynynyyynynyyyyyyyy
441712192969 ynnnnnYnnyyyyYNEEYYNYNEYEYNYnnnynyyyynNnyynnyny
441712192991 ynnyyyYyyyyynYYEEYYYYYYYEYYYynyyyynynnnEnnnnnnB
441712193000 nnynynNynnnnnNNNNYNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712193010 yyyyyyYyynynyNYYEYEYYYYEYYNYyyynnnnyynNnynnnyny
441712193047 yyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYEYYYYYYYEyyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193085 yyyyyyNyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193373 yyyyyyEyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyynnYnnnnnnB
441712193382 yyyyyyYyyyynyYYEYYYYYYYYEYEYnnnyynnyyyyyynnnyy
441712193398 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYEYYYEYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyynyyy
441712193434 nyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYEYNYYYYYYYynyyynnnyyyyyyyynyy
441712193496 ynyyyyYnnnynnNYEYNYEYYYYYYYEyyyynnnnnnyynnyyyyy
441712193541 nyyyynNyyyynyYYNYYYYYYYEYYYYnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnn
441712193552 nyyyyyYynnnynNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712193637 yyyyyyYnynyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712193640 yyyyyyYnyyynyYYNYYYYYYYYENEYnnnnnnnnnnnEnnnnnnnn
441712193665 nyynyyEyyyyyyYYEENYYYYYNYYEYyyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyy
441712193690 yyyyyYyyyyyyYEYYYYYYYEYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193709 nnnnnnYnnnnnyYYYYYYYYYYYYEYYnyyynyyynyynynnnyy
441712193727 yyyynYyyyynnYYYYEEYNYYYNYNNyyyynyynnnNnnyynnyn
441712193801 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyyy
441712193806 yyyyyyYyyyyyyEYYEYYYYYYYYYEEyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193816 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYEEYYYYYYyyyyynyyynyyyynnyn
441712193819 ynnnnnYyyyyynYYYYYYYYNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712193823 nnnnnnNnynyyyNYYYNYEYEEYYEYYyyynnyynnyyynyyynyR
441712193824 yyyynyYyynyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyynyynyynnnyyn
441712193827 ynnnnnYyyyyyyYYEYYYYYYYYYYYEnnyyynnnynyyyyyyny
441712193829 yyyyyyYnnnnnnYYNYYYYYYYYYYYYnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712193847 yyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193849 yyyyyyYyyynyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193866 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYNYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193870 yyyyyyNnnyynyEYYYEEEEYYYYEYYnnyynyyyyyyyynyyy
441712193889 yyyynyNynnnnnNNYNNNNNNNNNYNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnyn
441712193895 yynyyyYyyyyyyYYYYEYYYYYYYEYNyyyyyyynyyynyyyyn
441712193899 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYYYYEYEEENYYYYynyynyyyyyyynynny
441712193921 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193931 yynnnnYyynnnnEYYYYEYYYYYYYYYynnnnnnnnnnnnnyyy
441712193935 ynnyynYyynyyyYYYYYYYYYEYEYYEyyynnnnyyyyyyynyyyy
441712193952 yyyyyyEnyyynyYYYYYYYYEYYYYEYyynnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712193957 yyynyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYEYYNNNYEEnnyyyynyyynyyyyyyy
441712193967 yyyyyyNynnnnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyNnyyyyyyy
441712193980 nyyyyyYynynyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyynnynnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712193983 ynnyyyYnnnnnnYYEEYYYYYYYYYYEnynnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712193987 nynyyyYnnnnnnNYYYYYYYYYENYNYnnynnnynnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712193998 ynnyyyYyyynyyYYYEEYYEYEYYYYYynyyyyyyynyNnyyynnyn
441712193999 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYYEEYYEYEYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyynyynnn
441712194013 nnnnnnNynnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712194042 nnnnnnNynnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnynnnnnNnnnnnnn
441712194064 nnnnnnNnynnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNynnnnnnnynnnnnnnnnn
441712194166 yyyyyyNyyynyyYYYYYYYYYYEYYNYyyynyynnyyNnyyyyyyy
441712194262 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYEYYYYYYyynyynnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712194279 nyyyyyYnnyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyny
441712194285 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194293 nyyyyyYnnnnnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712194303 yyyyyyYynyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194308 yyyyyyYynnnnnYYYYYYYEYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194352 yyyyynYnnnnnnYYNNNYNNYNNNNNNnynnynnynyyyyyyyny
441712194357 yyyynYynyyyyYYYYYYEEYYYEEENyyyyyyyyyyynynynyy
441712194358 yyyyyyYynnnnnYNYYYNYYYYYYYYYyyynyyynnyyyyyyyyy
441712194397 yyynyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYEYYYYYYYyyyyyyynyyynyyyyy
441712194403 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYYNYNYYYYYYYYYynynyyyyyyNnnynyn
441712194466 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyyy
441712194479 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYEYNNYYnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712194499 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYEYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194518 yyyyynYnyyynyYYNYYYYEYYYYYYYnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712194525 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYEYYYEEEYYYEYYYyyyynyynyyNnynynyy
441712194536 yyyyynNnnnyyyYYYEENYYYEYYYYEnnyyyyynyyynnnnnnn
441712194711 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194727 yyyyyYnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712194759 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYNYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194780 yyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYEYYYEYYYYYYynyyyyyyyyyNnyyynyy
441712194800 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194801 yyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYYEYYYYYYYnyyyynyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194803 ynyyynYynnnnnYYYYEYYEYYNYEYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194815 yynyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyn
441712194828 yyyyyyYyynyyyYEYYYYYYYNYYYNYnyynnynnnyyNnyyyyyy
441712194830 nyyyynEnnnnnnEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712194831 nyyyyyYnnnnnnYYEYYYYNNNNNNNNynnnnnnnnnnNnnyyyyy
441712194836 yyyyyyYyyyyyYYYNYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194837 ynyyyyNyyyyyYYYEYYEYYYYYYYEYynyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194841 yyyyyyYyyyyyEYYYYYYYNYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194843 ynyyyyYyyynyEYYYYYYYYYYNYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyynnyy
441712194844 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYEYEYYYYNEYYEynyyyynynnyYnnnnnB
441712194846 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYNNNYYYYYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyynn
441712194855 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYEYYYYEEYYYYNNNNynnnnynnnynNnyyynnn
441712194864 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194867 yyyyyEyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194868 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYEEYYYYYnyyyyynyyyyynnyyn
441712194873 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYNYYYYYYYEYYYNYYyyynynyyyyyyyyynB
441712194877 yyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYYYYYYNYNNYYyyynyynyyyyNnyynyyn
441712194878 nyyyyyYynnnnnYYYYYYYYYYYYNYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194880 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYEENYYEYYYYEnynynnnynynyynnB
441712194881 yyyyyyNnyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYEYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194884 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYNYYYYEYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyynyyy
441712194894 ynnnnnYyynnnnNYEYEYEYYYYYEEYEyyynnnynyynnNnynyyy
441712194899 yyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYNYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyynynynnyy
441712194901 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYEYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyynyyyyyyyNnynyyyy
441712194903 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyynyyyy
441712194924 nyyynyYyynnnnNYYYYEEYYYYEYYYEyynnnynyyyyyyyyyy
441712194931 ynyyyyYyyyynyYYYYYYEYYYYYYNYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyyy
441712194939 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYNYYYYYYEEYYYYYEyyyyyynyyyyyynyyyy
441712194964 yyyyyyYnynyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYNYynynyyynynnynynnyn
441712194970 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712194979 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYEYYYYYyyyyyyyynnNnynnyyn
441712194983 yyyyyyYnnnnnnEEYYYYYEYYEEEYEYnynynnnnnnnynyyy
441712194992 yyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYYYYYYEYEYEYyyyynnyyyyyyynyy
441712194996 yyyyyyEyyyyyyYYEYYEYYYYYYYENNnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnn
441712195106 yynyyyNnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712195127 yyyyyyYnnyyyyYYEYYYYYYYYYYYYNyyyyynnnnnnyyynynn
441712195136 yyyyyyYynnnnnNYEEYEYYYYYYEYYYynynnnnynyynynnnnn
441712195165 nnynnyNnnynnnYNYNNNNNNNNNNYNYnynnnnnnnynNnynnnn
441712195233 nyyynnNnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnn
441712195241 nnynyNnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNYNYnynnnnnnnynnynynnn
441712195275 yyyyyyYyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyn
441712195322 nyyyyyYnyyyyYEYEYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyynyyyny
441712195333 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYEYEYYEYYYYYYyyyyyyyynyyyynyyny | |
