What is "Friend entries"?
FIA think about the rules a bit more in future please
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Formula-1 > FIA think about the rules a bit more in future please 20 March 2005 20:28:00

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

FIA think about the rules a bit more in future please

Guest 6 March 2005 05:31:07
 
I think this weekend has proven one thing. The FIA do not have a clue when
it comes to making sensible rules. Did they really spend more than one
minute working out the rules for this season before heading down to the pub.
The combination of bad qualifying rules and these new two race engine rules
have led to the worst practice and qualifying sessions of all time.
There are just too many loop holes that are there to be exploited at the
expense of the public. I reckon the teams have spent way more money than
previous years when the aim was to reduce the cost of the sport.

I have explained several times over the years that aggregate times are not
fair and a much better way is to combine positions either simply by
averaging positions, or otherwise by allocating points so that achieving the
best time in a session is more highly rewarded.

I hope who ever was responsible was proud of himself as several drivers did
not even bother running in the second qualifying session.

Not only that they also benefitted by being able to get a brand new engine
in the process.

Maybe Australia ought to accept being left out of international motor sport
by the FIA and start their own world series using some common sense in
working out the rules.
N.B
I dont agree with Stoddart trying to run outside of the rules except on
safety grounds as the car was totally un-tested.


Add comment
Pete Fenelon 6 March 2005 05:49:05 permanent link ]
 
s@dnews.tpgi.com.au­ wrote:>
I hope who ever was responsible was proud of himself as several drivers did> not even bother running in the second qualifying session.

What this has done is completely killed any interest in watching
qualifying. I'm sorry, but the old "12 laps, whenever you like in the
session" worked; ok, there might be nothing on track for 40 minutes,
but by God that last 20 could be thrilling. All the single-car formats
they've been trying are pathetic.

But, everything has to be bite-size now, and there has to be something
for James Allen and similar slow-witted imbeciles to drool over at all
times, so single-car qualifying was introduced to "increase the
spectacle".

If I still cared about F1 I'd be angry, but I can only look upon it
these days in the way one looks at an animal that needs putting out of
its misery.

pete
--
pete@fenelon.com "Send lawyers, guns and money...."
Add comment
Guest 6 March 2005 06:01:11 permanent link ]
 
I totally agree with you. I keep telling myself this is not meant to be a
made for TV soap opera or a staged stunt like WWF but it is meant to be the
pinacle of sport.

Bring back proper qualifying (prefably two sessions on Sat and Sun,
combining positions not times) and get rid of the two race engine rule.
Give the public an exciting practice and qualifying and I will start going
to the races again.


Add comment
David Betts 6 March 2005 12:31:05 permanent link ]
 
On 6 Mar 2005 01:49:05 GMT, Pete Fenelon <pete@fenelon.com> wrote:
s@dnews.tpgi.com.a­u wrote:>>
I hope who ever was responsible was proud of himself as several drivers did>> not even bother running in the second qualifying session.>
What this has done is completely killed any interest in watching>qualifying­. I'm sorry, but the old "12 laps, whenever you like in the>session" worked; ok, there might be nothing on track for 40 minutes,>but by God that last 20 could be thrilling. All the single-car formats>they've been trying are pathetic.

I'm not fan of single-car qualifying and never have been - check my
past posts - but two things: one, give it a chance; two, there was
enormous pressure to do something different.
But, everything has to be bite-size now, and there has to be something>for James Allen and similar slow-witted imbeciles to drool over at all>times, so single-car qualifying was introduced to "increase the>spectacle".

<mod hat on>

Sorry, by describing someone in this manner is clearly off charter in
this newsgroup. Please don't do it again.

<mod hat off>
If I still cared about F1 I'd be angry, but I can only look upon it>these days in the way one looks at an animal that needs putting out of>its misery.

If you don't care about it, why get so upset? Actually, qualifying did
its job, which was to provide an interesting grid for the race. The
weather would have jumbled it that way with or without the agregation.

Now let's at least wait and see how good the second session is when
pole is truly up for grabs. (Main problem is that we won't get to see
it in the UK, not the format itself.)

David Betts (davidb@motorsport.­org.uk)

"In the end it's always a matter of more accelerator and less brake" - Frank Gardner

British Racing Green: http://dbetts.motor­sport.org.uk/brg
Add comment
Finalquest 20 March 2005 20:28:00 permanent link ]
 
I have to agree. F1 has now become nothing more than a rich mans parade. I
can actually say it's now no better than NASCAR. Sorry F1 but you've blown
in the guise of creating a more competitive sport.
Ed Z
USA

<s@dnews.tpgi.com.a­u> wrote in message news:422a5cd6$1@dne­ws.tpgi.com.au...>
I think this weekend has proven one thing. The FIA do not have a clue when> it comes to making sensible rules. Did they really spend more than one> minute working out the rules for this season before heading down to the > pub.> The combination of bad qualifying rules and these new two race engine > rules> have led to the worst practice and qualifying sessions of all time.> There are just too many loop holes that are there to be exploited at the> expense of the public. I reckon the teams have spent way more money than> previous years when the aim was to reduce the cost of the sport.>
I have explained several times over the years that aggregate times are not> fair and a much better way is to combine positions either simply by> averaging positions, or otherwise by allocating points so that achieving > the> best time in a session is more highly rewarded.>
I hope who ever was responsible was proud of himself as several drivers > did> not even bother running in the second qualifying session.>
Not only that they also benefitted by being able to get a brand new engine> in the process.>
Maybe Australia ought to accept being left out of international motor > sport> by the FIA and start their own world series using some common sense in> working out the rules.> N.B> I dont agree with Stoddart trying to run outside of the rules except on> safety grounds as the car was totally un-tested.>

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Formula-1 > FIA think about the rules a bit more in future please 20 March 2005 20:28:00

see also:
NASCAR-TRUCK: California Speedway opens…
STOCKCAR: Matt Hawkins 2005 SpeedFest…
GRANDAM/CHARITY: Newman, Camp Boggy…
pass tests:
see also:
HELP!!!!!!!!
Power Steering Fluid in brake system
Hello,I need some help with the tim...

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .