What are tags?
Re: Details of FIA and Ferrari meeting  [LONG}
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Formula-1 > Re: Details of FIA and Ferrari meeting [LONG} 9 February 2005 18:35:35

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Re: Details of FIA and Ferrari meeting [LONG}

Phil Newnham 3 February 2005 02:27:34
 Chino Cherokee wrote:
<snip>
Let's make loads of stuff standard.
Ferrari agreed.

Good for them. I agree on the ECU front, certainly - standard ECU would
provide a policeable ban on active traction control while still allowing
the teams to write their own engine management software, as I understand
what the FIA means by standard ECU ie. hardware standard only. The rest
of it - well, if they have to have standard transmissions and
homologated designs to avoid killing F1 by overspending then I guess
they have to, but I don't think I like it, especially not the idea of
the cars only changing twice during the season.
Other teams, um.... not so much...>
two teams, namely Toyota and McLaren, had not>>replied and had therefore not voted. This was noted.

Do they have to agree with the FIA to get your vote then?

--
Phil

http://www.usefilm.­com/photographer/313­07.html
Add comment
Peter 3 February 2005 02:42:59 permanent link ]
 Chino Cherokee <tifosoREM@OVEcomca­st.net> writes>> The FIA and Ferrari were both in favour of this.>> Ferrari agreed.>> Ferrari agreed.>
Hardly surprising since the FIA and Ferrari first agreed on the new regs
at their May 2004 meeting.
--
Peter


Add comment
Harold Adrian Russell Philby 4 February 2005 07:59:38 permanent link ]
 On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:34:05 +0000, Graham Hodgson <ttgmh@hotmail.com>­
wrote:>>>and how it is that being the >>>only ones to have attended the meeting and agreed to be in F1 till 2012 >>>they have *no* sway over the technical direction of F1.>
No, as I haven't said anything of the sort.>
So, they hold some sway over the technical direction? Then either:>a) They generally like the ideas>b) The FIA proposed some really banana ideas and this is what they got >pared back to.

If you're content to fabricate things you imagine to be my opinion,
merely to strike them down, would you mind shutting the lights when
you're done?

Add comment
Harold Adrian Russell Philby 9 February 2005 18:35:35 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 00:17:34 +0000, Graham Hodgson <ttgmh@hotmail.com>­
wrote:>So banning active suspension or traction control didn't hinder Williams?

The valid point, is it wasn't done to hinder Williams.

Vs.

"I'd like to slow [Ferrari] down". - Max Mosely, 2/8/05
And don't be such a fuckwit - England is not going apeshit over it.

Look around ...Looks apeshit to me.

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Formula-1 > Re: Details of FIA and Ferrari meeting [LONG} 9 February 2005 18:35:35

see also:
2003 corolla oil change
resurfacing flywheel?
New Car Dealer - Consumer Complaints
pass tests:
see also:
Intake Gasket
1986 Toyota Pick Up truck, 4 cylinder.
GMC ABS light and Transmission

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .