How to find a user by their nick?
Re: New Shelby Mustang in Motor Trend
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Ford > Re: New Shelby Mustang in Motor Trend 24 April 2005 22:43:02

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Re: New Shelby Mustang in Motor Trend

Michael Johnson 23 April 2005 07:14:33
 I expect that 410 hp is an extremely underrated figure. A tuner will
have that engine making 600-700 rwhp in the blink of an eye. If it is
making 410 hp then Ford has the thing breathing through a soda straw.

RichA wrote:> Is it me, or does 410 hp sound kind of low, coming from a> 5.4 litre with a blower? It could be that they are downplaying> the performance figures, but why do that today, the insurers> already nail cars like this? My Mach-1 with it's smaller engine> and no blower is probably and arguably rated at around 330-340hp,> around 300 at the rear wheels so I find it hard to believe the > Shelby is only 410. Apart from that, the car looks> superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little> high.> -Rich
Add comment
RichA 23 April 2005 00:13:00 permanent link ]
 Is it me, or does 410 hp sound kind of low, coming from a
5.4 litre with a blower? It could be that they are downplaying
the performance figures, but why do that today, the insurers
already nail cars like this? My Mach-1 with it's smaller engine
and no blower is probably and arguably rated at around 330-340hp,
around 300 at the rear wheels so I find it hard to believe the
Shelby is only 410. Apart from that, the car looks
superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little
high.
-Rich
Add comment
Scotter 23 April 2005 08:47:50 permanent link ]
 I agree 410hp for a blown 5.4 seems a bit low.
Look at the 2003/?04? Cobra which is a blown 4.6 making ~400 hp.
You would think beefing it up to 5.4 would put it more around 470 hp...
Is that 5.4 going to be 16 or 32 valve? Maybe it is just a 16-valve and that
would explain it... ?
On the optimistic side, maybe they are using very little boost and also
tuning it conservative so that it is a very dependable and long-lasting
engine.
And maybe the torque numbers/curve is super impressive?
--
Scotter
96 GT vert

"RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:ggmi611gkm42qn­jou8lqufkj8vv4fn57kd­@4ax.com...> Is it me, or does 410 hp sound kind of low, coming from a> 5.4 litre with a blower? It could be that they are downplaying> the performance figures, but why do that today, the insurers> already nail cars like this? My Mach-1 with it's smaller engine> and no blower is probably and arguably rated at around 330-340hp,> around 300 at the rear wheels so I find it hard to believe the> Shelby is only 410. Apart from that, the car looks> superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little> high.> -Rich


Add comment
Brent P 23 April 2005 09:19:29 permanent link ]
 In article <ggmi611gkm42qnjou8­lqufkj8vv4fn57kd@4ax­.com>, RichA wrote:> superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little> high.

If that's the price forget it. It's still carrying over quite a bit from
the basic 6 cylinder car, and the competition in that price range
doesn't force people to put up with that.

$40K is pushing the acceptable limit for this car, regardless of how good
the engine is.


Add comment
Dwight 23 April 2005 17:14:27 permanent link ]
 <NoOption5L@aol.com>­ wrote in message
news:1114222087.213­405.102010@o13g2000c­wo.googlegroups.com.­..> RichA wrote:>
Rich,>
Horsepower numbers are like badges, they don't mean a thing. It's all> about the performance, and that Shelby is going to perform! It will be> able suck up your Mach 1 and spit it out.>
As for the price, it's listed at $39,999.>
Patrick> '93 Cobra

I want to meet the man who picks one up for $39,999.

dwight
'93 non-Cobra


Add comment
Fclaugus 23 April 2005 19:21:08 permanent link ]
 Autoweek's figures are a bit different...

2007 FORD SHELBY COBRA GT500
ON SALE: June 2006
BASE PRICE: $39,000 (est.)
POWERTRAIN: 5.4-liter, 450-plus-hp, 450-plus-lb-ft supercharged V8; rwd,
six-speed manual
CURB WEIGHT: 3600 lbs (est.)
0 to 60 MPH: 4.5 seconds (est.)

Final horsepower figures are not firm, but Thai-Tang hints it will be "well
over 450 hp, closer to 500." Look for 450-plus lb-ft of torque too.

http://www.autoweek­.com/article.cms?art­icleId=102065


"RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:ggmi611gkm42qn­jou8lqufkj8vv4fn57kd­@4ax.com...> Is it me, or does 410 hp sound kind of low, coming from a> 5.4 litre with a blower? It could be that they are downplaying> the performance figures, but why do that today, the insurers> already nail cars like this? My Mach-1 with it's smaller engine> and no blower is probably and arguably rated at around 330-340hp,> around 300 at the rear wheels so I find it hard to believe the> Shelby is only 410. Apart from that, the car looks> superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little> high.> -Rich


Add comment
SVTKate 24 April 2005 06:02:16 permanent link ]
 Do you think they will make it in a Vert????


"fclaugus" <fclaugus@yahoo.com­> wrote in message
news:EJtae.10372$0d­6.6817@tornado.ohior­dc.rr.com...
| Autoweek's figures are a bit different...
|
| 2007 FORD SHELBY COBRA GT500
| ON SALE: June 2006
| BASE PRICE: $39,000 (est.)
| POWERTRAIN: 5.4-liter, 450-plus-hp, 450-plus-lb-ft supercharged V8; rwd,
| six-speed manual
| CURB WEIGHT: 3600 lbs (est.)
| 0 to 60 MPH: 4.5 seconds (est.)
|
| Final horsepower figures are not firm, but Thai-Tang hints it will be
"well
| over 450 hp, closer to 500." Look for 450-plus lb-ft of torque too.
|
| http://www.autoweek­.com/article.cms?art­icleId=102065
|
|
| "RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
| news:ggmi611gkm42qn­jou8lqufkj8vv4fn57kd­@4ax.com...
| > Is it me, or does 410 hp sound kind of low, coming from a
| > 5.4 litre with a blower? It could be that they are downplaying
| > the performance figures, but why do that today, the insurers
| > already nail cars like this? My Mach-1 with it's smaller engine
| > and no blower is probably and arguably rated at around 330-340hp,
| > around 300 at the rear wheels so I find it hard to believe the
| > Shelby is only 410. Apart from that, the car looks
| > superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little
| > high.
| > -Rich
|
|


Add comment
Joe 24 April 2005 06:02:17 permanent link ]
 Let's hope so. I figure by the time they make the convertible I just
might be in the market.


"SVTKate" <whoever@whatever.c­omplaint.dept> wrote in
news:I6Dae.12361$go­4.11421@newsread2.ne­ws.atl.earthlink.net­:
Do you think they will make it in a Vert????>
"fclaugus" <fclaugus@yahoo.com­> wrote in message > news:EJtae.10372$0d­6.6817@tornado.ohior­dc.rr.com...>| Autoweek's figures are a bit different...>|>| 2007 FORD SHELBY COBRA GT500>| ON SALE: June 2006>| BASE PRICE: $39,000 (est.)>| POWERTRAIN: 5.4-liter, 450-plus-hp, 450-plus-lb-ft supercharged V8;>| rwd, six-speed manual>| CURB WEIGHT: 3600 lbs (est.)>| 0 to 60 MPH: 4.5 seconds (est.)>|>| Final horsepower figures are not firm, but Thai-Tang hints it will>| be > "well>| over 450 hp, closer to 500." Look for 450-plus lb-ft of torque too.>|>| http://www.autoweek­.com/article.cms?art­icleId=102065>|>|>| "RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message>| news:ggmi611gkm42qn­jou8lqufkj8vv4fn57kd­@4ax.com...>| > Is it me, or does 410 hp sound kind of low, coming from a>| > 5.4 litre with a blower? It could be that they are downplaying>| > the performance figures, but why do that today, the insurers>| > already nail cars like this? My Mach-1 with it's smaller engine>| > and no blower is probably and arguably rated at around 330-340hp,>| > around 300 at the rear wheels so I find it hard to believe the>| > Shelby is only 410. Apart from that, the car looks>| > superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little>| > high.>| > -Rich>|>| >

Add comment
Nicholas D 24 April 2005 22:43:02 permanent link ]
 
"RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:ggmi611gkm42qn­jou8lqufkj8vv4fn57kd­@4ax.com...> Is it me, or does 410 hp sound kind of low, coming from a> 5.4 litre with a blower? It could be that they are downplaying> the performance figures, but why do that today, the insurers> already nail cars like this? My Mach-1 with it's smaller engine> and no blower is probably and arguably rated at around 330-340hp,> around 300 at the rear wheels so I find it hard to believe the> Shelby is only 410. Apart from that, the car looks> superb, but the $70-$80k U.S. price tag seems a little> high.> -Rich

When I went to the NY Auto Show the Ford rep there said the Shelby would
cost around $39k. They are going to produce as many of these cars as the
demand will be. Also expect 450 plus hp more towards 500hp as others
mentioned in this thread. They wont have sequential tail lights cause the
California Special is also returning and will debut with it.

-Nick


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Ford > Re: New Shelby Mustang in Motor Trend 24 April 2005 22:43:02

see also:
Re: Running Out of Gas in Evacuation…
Dangerous Tire Defects
pass tests:
see also:
My GMC Jimmy sat for 6 months. Jump...
AC for a 94 mercury cougar
Turn Signals not working

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .