How do I stop my e-mail subscription?
red light cameras are not the solution
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Driving > red light cameras are not the solution 21 March 2005 19:49:42

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

red light cameras are not the solution

Itsme 9 March 2005 22:19:14
 The proper solution is not a camera. A camera is not going to stop an
accident from happening or call for help after an accident occurs.
What needs to happen is that an engineer needs to examine the
intersection and see why so many drivers are running red lights. He
can then make recommendations on what modifications need to be made to
the intersection to make it safer. That will also save a lot of money
since accidents cost everyone one a lot of time and money. If that is
not feasible then photoblocker is not a bad idea.

http://www.phantomp­late.com/photoblocke­r.html

Add comment
Justin Rhodes 18 March 2005 07:38:24 permanent link ]
 
"itsme" <bbypretty@yahoo.co­m> wrote in message
news:1110392354.403­483.22840@l41g2000cw­c.googlegroups.com..­.> The proper solution is not a camera. A camera is not going to stop an> accident from happening or call for help after an accident occurs.> What needs to happen is that an engineer needs to examine the> intersection and see why so many drivers are running red lights. He> can then make recommendations on what modifications need to be made to> the intersection to make it safer. That will also save a lot of money> since accidents cost everyone one a lot of time and money. If that is> not feasible then photoblocker is not a bad idea.>

Mr. Itsme,

Look at John Lansford's Raleigh Red Light Camera thread from 1-11-05. He's a
Professional Engineer, and it sounds to me like he supports the
cameras.(please, John, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong)


Add comment
K Flynn 18 March 2005 08:48:55 permanent link ]
 Justin Rhodes wrote:> "itsme" <bbypretty@yahoo.co­m> wrote in message> news:1110392354.403­483.22840@l41g2000cw­c.googlegroups.com..­.> > The proper solution is not a camera. A camera is not going to stop
accident from happening or call for help after an accident occurs.> > What needs to happen is that an engineer needs to examine the> > intersection and see why so many drivers are running red lights.
can then make recommendations on what modifications need to be made
the intersection to make it safer. That will also save a lot of
money> > since accidents cost everyone one a lot of time and money. If that
not feasible then photoblocker is not a bad idea.> >
Mr. Itsme,>
Look at John Lansford's Raleigh Red Light Camera thread from 1-11-05.
He's a> Professional Engineer, and it sounds to me like he supports the> cameras.(please, John, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong)

(clearing throat) Ummm. The fellow doesn't care. He is a spammer trying
to generate traffic to a web site that sells photo-blocking license
plate covers.

Add comment
John Lansford 18 March 2005 14:30:08 permanent link ]
 "Justin Rhodes" <jkrhodes@cableone.­net> wrote:
"itsme" <bbypretty@yahoo.co­m> wrote in message >news:1110392354.40­3483.22840@l41g2000c­wc.googlegroups.com.­..>> The proper solution is not a camera. A camera is not going to stop an>> accident from happening or call for help after an accident occurs.>> What needs to happen is that an engineer needs to examine the>> intersection and see why so many drivers are running red lights. He>> can then make recommendations on what modifications need to be made to>> the intersection to make it safer. That will also save a lot of money>> since accidents cost everyone one a lot of time and money. If that is>> not feasible then photoblocker is not a bad idea.>>
Mr. Itsme,>
Look at John Lansford's Raleigh Red Light Camera thread from 1-11-05. He's a >Professional Engineer, and it sounds to me like he supports the >cameras.(please, John, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) >
Yes I do support them, if the yellow sequences are properly timed and
there's a history of crashes at that intersection. Putting them up
solely for revenue generation is wrong, IMO.

John Lansford, PE
--
The unofficial I-26 Construction Webpage:
http://users.vnet.n­et/lansford/a10/
Add comment
B-Ez 18 March 2005 23:14:00 permanent link ]
 Does anyone believe that the substitution of the police officers by the
photo radar cameras is up for safety reason? Or is it because the
government is too slipshod about this issue? If you reckon that red
light cameras only catch people who drive inattentively, then you're
really too immature to be unsubstantiated. It is a different way of
collecting tax from law abiding citizens.

Add comment
John David Galt 19 March 2005 04:12:57 permanent link ]
 John Lansford wrote:> Yes I do support them, if the yellow sequences are properly timed and> there's a history of crashes at that intersection. Putting them up> solely for revenue generation is wrong, IMO.>
John Lansford, PE

I agree except that I'd also want to first investigate other possible
reasons why so many people run the light. For example, if the lights are
placed where other objects make it hard to observe them at certain times
of day, that should be fixed.
Add comment
SP Cook 19 March 2005 08:24:25 permanent link ]
 
John David Galt wrote:> John Lansford wrote:> > Yes I do support them, if the yellow sequences are properly timed
there's a history of crashes at that intersection. Putting them up> > solely for revenue generation is wrong, IMO.> >
I agree except that I'd also want to first investigate other possible> reasons why so many people run the light. For example, if the lights
placed where other objects make it hard to observe them at certain
times> of day, that should be fixed.

The simple answer is that such dangerous traffic offences as running
red lights and stop signs is 1000s of times more dangerous than driving
safe and fast on fully limited access highways designed for such
speeds. However, it is far easier to run radar out on the interstate,
hiding behind signs like the common criminals that traffic cops are,
than to actually do any work, such as simple parking a police car at an
intersection with a problem in plain sight, which would insure 99.9%
compliance.

Remember that every second spent running radar is a second stolen from
serious law enforcement work.

SP Cook

Add comment
B-Ez 21 March 2005 19:49:42 permanent link ]
 Q:Is this plan about safety or money?

A:Campbell unveiled the red- light camera plan as part of her 2005
budget, saying it would help plug a deficit. At first, she made scant
reference to safety.

Councilman Kevin Conwell says he has been inundated with complaints
from residents. He proposed a similar plan 18 months ago, but it went
nowhere.

The timing of Campbell's plan suggests she is more interested in
raising revenue than reducing crashes, Conwell said.

"It sounds like they have a quota to meet for the budget," Conwell
said.

Councilman Joe Cimperman, who represents downtown, agrees.

"Why do we want to send another signal saying, 'Hey, don't come into
Cleveland'?" he said. "Maybe we should worry about real economic
development rather than nickel and diming commuters."

Since the initial budget rollout, Campbell and her staff have harped on
safety.

"This will lead to a decrease in crashes, a decrease in death,"
Campbell said at a news conference this week.

Add comment
B-Ez 21 March 2005 20:04:16 permanent link ]
 Mayor Jane Campbell says her plan to install cameras at traffic lights
would make Cleveland streets safer while also padding the city's
coffers.

This was an interview made wit Mayor Jane Campbell :

Q:Is this plan about safety or money?

A:Campbell unveiled the red- light camera plan as part of her 2005
budget, saying it would help plug a deficit. At first, she made scant
reference to safety.

Councilman Kevin Conwell says he has been inundated with complaints
from residents. He proposed a similar plan 18 months ago, but it went
nowhere.

The timing of Campbell's plan suggests she is more interested in
raising revenue than reducing crashes, Conwell said.

"It sounds like they have a quota to meet for the budget," Conwell
said.

Councilman Joe Cimperman, who represents downtown, agrees.

"Why do we want to send another signal saying, 'Hey, don't come into
Cleveland'?" he said. "Maybe we should worry about real economic
development rather than nickel and diming commuters."

Since the initial budget rollout, Campbell and her staff have harped on
safety.

"This will lead to a decrease in crashes, a decrease in death,"
Campbell said at a news conference this week.


This is the direct site
"http://www.clevela­nd.com/news/plaindea­ler/index.ssf?/base/­cuyahoga/11075131786­6731.xml
"

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Driving > red light cameras are not the solution 21 March 2005 19:49:42

see also:
NASCAR-CUP: Homestead: Dodge teams race…
NASCAR-BUSCH: Homestead: Starting grid
NASCAR-BUSCH: Homestead: Winning team…
pass tests:
see also:
97 bmw 528i left rear door panel
1992 BMW 318isTransmission
1997 Mercury Sable Headlights

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .