How to restrict who may read my entries?
KY - Major accident snarls I-64/US 23 interchange
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Driving > KY - Major accident snarls I-64/US 23 interchange 5 March 2005 13:36:52

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

KY - Major accident snarls I-64/US 23 interchange

Sherman Cahal 4 March 2005 22:20:11
 http://www.dailyinde­pendent.com/articles­/2005/03/04/news/01f­atalaccident04.txt

The driver of the Accord was at fault as she ran through a traffic
light into the path of a tractor trailer. The interchange was recently
expanded to include 'doghouse' signals with adequate signage explaining
the situation. The signal configurations are found throughout the
region and state.

--

Ohio woman dies in collision
By KENNETH HART - The Independent

CATLETTSBURG An Ohio woman was killed Thursday in a violent collision
involving a tanker truck hauling diesel fuel.

Sabrina M. Row's car was ripped in half after it was broadsided by a
tractor-trailer at the junction of U.S. 23 and Interstate 64.

The accident occurred just after 3 p.m. According to Boyd County
Sheriff Terry Keelin, Row, 24, of Proctorville, was attempting to turn
left from U.S. 23 onto the eastbound freeway entrance ramp and pulled
into the path of the northbound truck, driven by Larry Conley, 56, of
Worthington.

Following the impact, both vehicles went through a guardrail and over
the grassy slope adjacent to the ramp.

The rear portion of Row's car snagged on the guardrail. The front half
- with the driver inside - was shoved over the hill by the truck.

A pink shoebox and a child's shoe were laying on the blacktop next to
the back half of the car.

Row was pronounced dead at the scene by Boyd County Coroner Keith
Moore. Emergency crews worked for more than an hour to remove her body
from the twisted remains of her Honda Accord. Conley, the truck driver,
sat in the grass nearby, uninjured but obviously shaken.

Conley was subsequently taken to King's Daughters Medical Center to be
examined, Keelin said.

Keelin said both drivers apparently had a green light as they
approached the intersection. A witness in a vehicle behind the truck
told authorities the light was green and that Row turned in front of
the rig, he said.

A sign at the intersection warns that motorists turning left onto the
interstate must yield to oncoming traffic when the light is green.

Keelin said many drivers don't realize that a solid green light at an
intersection like the one where Thursday's accident occurred means that
the light is green in both directions.

"A lot of times, people will just focus on the light itself," he said.

On the other hand, if a signal is displaying a green arrow, it means
the driver in that lane has the right of way and that oncoming vehicles
must stop, he said.

The tanker truck remained upright. Some diesel fuel leaked from one of
the vehicle's saddle tanks, but none came out of the trailer, which was
fully loaded, said Mike Branham, chief of the England Hill Volunteer
Fire Department.

In addition to England Hill, fire departments from Catlettsburg,
Cannonsburg, Kenova and Marathon Ashland Petroleum's Catlettsburg
refinery responded to the accident.

The eastbound lanes of I-64 were blocked by emergency vehicles and
closed for about two hours. Traffic was diverted off the interstate at
the Catlettsburg exit.

Add comment
Richard 4 March 2005 22:53:00 permanent link ]
 On 4 Mar 2005 10:20:11 -0800 Sherman Cahal wrote:
The driver of the Accord was at fault as she ran through a traffic> light into the path of a tractor trailer. The interchange was recently> expanded to include 'doghouse' signals with adequate signage explaining> the situation. The signal configurations are found throughout the> region and state.>

Sounds like the DOT could be blamed for this.
Who in the hell ever heard of giving two opposing directions the green
light?
That's only asking for trouble.
When I approach a light, it's green, I expect the opposing traffic to be
stopped.
Isn't this what traffic lights are designed to do? Control the flow of
traffic to prevent accidents?


Add comment
Sherman Cahal 4 March 2005 23:19:07 permanent link ]
 Richard wrote:> On 4 Mar 2005 10:20:11 -0800 Sherman Cahal wrote:>
http://www.dailyind­ependent.com/article­s/2005/03/04/news/01­fatalaccident04> > .txt> >
The driver of the Accord was at fault as she ran through a traffic> > light into the path of a tractor trailer. The interchange was
recently> > expanded to include 'doghouse' signals with adequate signage
explaining> > the situation. The signal configurations are found throughout the> > region and state.> >
Sounds like the DOT could be blamed for this.> Who in the hell ever heard of giving two opposing directions the
green> light?> That's only asking for trouble.> When I approach a light, it's green, I expect the opposing traffic to
stopped.> Isn't this what traffic lights are designed to do? Control the flow
traffic to prevent accidents?

Did you not read the article at all?

Both northbound and southbound traffic had green lights, with the left
turn from southbound US 23 to eastbound Interstate 64 being controlled
by, essentially, a yield sign. They had no green arrow for their turn,
and with a sign stating that they must yield when they have no green
arrow, they were violating the law by not yielding to northbound
traffic.

Add comment
H . B . Elkins 5 March 2005 00:01:57 permanent link ]
 On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:53:00 -0600, Richard wrote:
Sounds like the DOT could be blamed for this.>Who in the hell ever heard of giving two opposing directions the green>light?>That's­ only asking for trouble.>When I approach a light, it's green, I expect the opposing traffic to be>stopped.>Isn't this what traffic lights are designed to do? Control the flow of>traffic to prevent accidents?

Not traffic from a side road, but traffic on the same road in the opposite
direction.

She made a left turn on a green light, in front of oncoming traffic. This
intersection has the type of signal that at one point in the cycle, traffic
turning left can make a protected turn under a green arrow, while oncoming
traffic has a red light; while during the rest of the cycle, both directions
have a green and it's incumbent on the left turning motorist to make sure no
traffic is oncoming.


--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictor plate"
Add comment
Richard 5 March 2005 02:25:31 permanent link ]
 On 4 Mar 2005 12:01:57 -0800 H.B. Elkins wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:53:00 -0600, Richard wrote:>
Sounds like the DOT could be blamed for this.>>Who in the hell ever heard of giving two opposing directions the green>>light?>>That­'s only asking for trouble.>>When I approach a light, it's green, I expect the opposing traffic to be>>stopped.>>Isn't­ this what traffic lights are designed to do? Control the flow of>>traffic to prevent accidents?>
Not traffic from a side road, but traffic on the same road in the opposite> direction.>
She made a left turn on a green light, in front of oncoming traffic. This> intersection has the type of signal that at one point in the cycle,> traffic turning left can make a protected turn under a green arrow, while> oncoming traffic has a red light; while during the rest of the cycle, both> directions have a green and it's incumbent on the left turning motorist to> make sure no traffic is oncoming.>

From the way the article was written, I was under the impression that for
some reason, two opposing directions had green lights.
Thanks for the clarification.
I've seen it myself only to many times, where someone will dart out in front
of me thinking they have time to get by.
So far, I've not hit anybody.
I just wonder how fast she was travelling in order to be pushed around like
that.


Add comment
Sherman Cahal 5 March 2005 02:57:27 permanent link ]
 Richard wrote:> On 4 Mar 2005 12:01:57 -0800 H.B. Elkins wrote:>
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:53:00 -0600, Richard wrote:> >
Sounds like the DOT could be blamed for this.> >>Who in the hell ever heard of giving two opposing directions the
green> >>light?> >>That's only asking for trouble.> >>When I approach a light, it's green, I expect the opposing traffic
to be> >>stopped.> >>Isn't this what traffic lights are designed to do? Control the flow
traffic to prevent accidents?> >
Not traffic from a side road, but traffic on the same road in the
opposite> > direction.> >
She made a left turn on a green light, in front of oncoming
traffic. This> > intersection has the type of signal that at one point in the cycle,> > traffic turning left can make a protected turn under a green arrow,
while> > oncoming traffic has a red light; while during the rest of the
cycle, both> > directions have a green and it's incumbent on the left turning
motorist to> > make sure no traffic is oncoming.> >
From the way the article was written, I was under the impression that
some reason, two opposing directions had green lights.> Thanks for the clarification.> I've seen it myself only to many times, where someone will dart out
in front> of me thinking they have time to get by.> So far, I've not hit anybody.> I just wonder how fast she was travelling in order to be pushed
around like> that.

Well, I am assuming that the tractor trailer was going around 55 MPH at
the beginning of the interchange, since US 23 north and south of the
exit are 55 MPH with the southern part more sparase and empty -- so
you'll typically find vehicles and trucks going 65 to 70 MPH.

The driver of the car was inattentive and was probably going around it
at about 15 MPH.

The impact of the truck sent it to the shoulder of northbound US 23,
where it rammed into a guardrail and ran down an emankment coming to a
rest next to eastbound Interstate 64.

Add comment
Bzpa136 5 March 2005 13:36:52 permanent link ]
 I understand being comprehensive, but did the article really have to
explain what happens when you have a solid green and when you have a
green arrow? Or is this not covered in the KY driver's manual?

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Driving > KY - Major accident snarls I-64/US 23 interchange 5 March 2005 13:36:52

see also:
NASCAR-BUSCH/NASCAR-CUP: Las Vegas…
F1: Ferrari well prepared for season…
pass tests:
see also:
Vehicle Recalls
Car and Component Recalls
Vehicle Technical Service Bulletins

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .