--> "Ad hominem would imply that there's no basis for the things people are> saying about you. Based on your posts, I don't think that that applies."> -- Nate Nagel, 2005

"Universal Soldier" <dood@wheres.my.car­> wrote in message> news:18492221.e99Fd­VmcM8@cox.cox.net...­>> I'm a strong supporter of the free speech, but I think that insulting>> anti-Bush car stickers are illegal, because they are meant to enrage >> other>> motorists, regardless of their political views, thereby increasing the>> chances of road rage. There must be laws about public endangerment and>> disturbance of peace that can be applied here.>>

Then the same would apply to "Proud to be a Republican.">

I'm a strong supporter of the free speech, but I think that insulting>anti-Bush­ car stickers are illegal, because they are meant to enrage other>motorists, regardless of their political views, thereby increasing the>chances of road rage. There must be laws about public endangerment and>disturbance of peace that can be applied here.

Do what I do. Get in the lane ahead of them, then hork a> big snotwad out your sunroof. With a little practice, you> can see their angry facial reactions in your rearview mirror> after the blob hits their windshield.>

It we're going to get rid of bumper stickers insulting Bush, let's

I'm a strong supporter of the free speech, but I think that insulting>anti-Bush­ car stickers are illegal

chances of road rage. There must be laws about public endangerment

disturbance of peace that can be applied here.

Hey dood. That is the worst troll post i ever seed.>

I'm a strong supporter of the free speech, but I think that insulting> anti-Bush car stickers are illegal, because they are meant to enrage other> motorists, regardless of their political views, thereby increasing the> chances of road rage. There must be laws about public endangerment and> disturbance of peace that can be applied here.>

Universal Soldier <dood@wheres.my.car­> wrote:>

Do what I do. Get in the lane ahead of them, then hork a > big snotwad out your sunroof. With a little practice, you > can see their angry facial reactions in your rearview mirror > after the blob hits their windshield. >

Thanks for admitting in public that you have broken the following laws:>

Spitting in public> Littering> Reckless endangerment> Assault with intent to commit bodily harm> Battery

Republicans are dangerous. Please be careful democrats!> --> ©hri§tЗrжm®

Universal Soldier wrote:>> I'm a strong supporter of the free speech, but I think that insulting>> anti-Bush car stickers are illegal, because they are meant to enrage>> other motorists, regardless of their political views, thereby>> increasing the chances of road rage. There must be laws about public>> endangerment and disturbance of peace that can be applied here.>

It's called free speech.>It's guaranteed by the US Constitution.>It's spelled out in the "Bill of Rights">

It's the foundation of our liberties.....and you want to give up the right >of dissent?>

You are a sheep. A lemming.>

You would give up what many Americans died for.

You can't yell fire in a crowded theater, either. There are limits to> free speech. Whether this should or should not be limited is a valid> question. The answer is not so obvious.

Where can I get one of these stickers. It is my first amendment right to >insult humanzees like Bush.

Republicans have no control over their own minds.> They become enraged by simply reading> something they don't like. Then they> commit crimes and blame the words for their> criminalities. This makes them the most dangerous of all> peoples of the world.>

They need to be rounded up and sterilized, placed> in concentration camps, or some other protective> environment before they commit crimes on a massive scale.

In the interest of edification only and the education of those who> might live in Republican states, here's a list of some typical> anti-bush bumper stickers:>

Buck Fush!> The French were Right!> Proud to live in a Blue State> Pro-America/Anti-Bu­sh> Trust Him Twice? Shame on us!> No one Died When Clinton Lied> Truth? Yes! / Bush? No!> Bush-Cheney: Weapons of Mass Deception> GW Lies - GIs Die> Bush lied, Americans signed - Bush lied, Americans died.> George W. Bush - How many times will he LIE today?> Bush + Rush=Double the Lies> Bush is a LIAR> Do Bush's Lies make you feel safer? Which ones?> NO WMDs. NO Al-Qaeda Line. Bush's Lies Kill Innocents> What Else is Bush Hiding?> George W. Bush: Ignorant, a Liar, or Just Incompetent?> Investigate BUSH> Bush-speak is truth pollution> George W. Bush: Liar in Chief> Bush Lied, People Died/Jobs Dried/Cronies Ride/Environment Fried> Democracy - Not Theocracy> George W. Bush is Big Brother> Real Conservatives Don't Start Wars> America Deserves Better than Bush> Bush is an idiot and you know it> Dubya is for Dubious> November 2, 2004 - WE ALL LOST> Bush will never by my President.> We're All Wearing the Blue Dress Now> "DISSENT is the highest form of PATRIOTISM"- Thomas Jefferson> Pro-Constitution/An­ti-Bush> More Trees - Less Bush> Truman: The Buck Stops Here/Bush: The Buck Starts Here!> My Grandkids can't afford for me to vote Republican> Outsource Bush> Bush: Taking America to Halliburton in a Handbasket> http://irregulartim­es.com/exprogressive­.html

<Xeton2001IsAMoron­.20.dwpj65@spamgourm­et.com> wrote in message >news:1109365758.40­3033.256800@f14g2000­cwb.googlegroups.com­...>> "i ever seed?" Did you even make it past 3rd grade, retard?>>

No, Judy's car runs on tars too. The rest of us use tires.

You can't yell fire in a crowded theater, either. There are limits

free speech. Whether this should or should not be limited is a valid> question. The answer is not so obvious.

Just because there are laws violating free speech such as the "fire">law doesn't mean limits of free speech are right.>

One makes "fire" illegal for supposed safety issues. However, the>proper way to legislate this while upholding the freedom of speech is>to create a law that says IF you yell something that causes panic and>harm to other, you're screwed.