What is OPML?
Flat Monitor Question #2
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Open discussion > Flat Monitor Question #2 1 March 2005 21:30:16

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Flat Monitor Question #2

Tlgtr 25 February 2005 23:42:32
 I want the lowest possible "ms" number possible...right?

Add comment
Darus 25 February 2005 23:50:21 permanent link ]
 Right...lower is better

Add comment
Plowboy 25 February 2005 23:51:08 permanent link ]
 YES, plus you want HIGH number contrast ratio otherwise the screen is going
to look faded. 800:1 seems nice, probably goes hand in hand with Response
time though, meaning great response, means great contrast. last thing upon
maybe comparing 2 models, and going which to buy, would probably pixel size.
HTH.

-plow, AKA Sting32, & in NSR mwing32...
tlgtr enlightened us with:> I want the lowest possible "ms" number possible...right?


Add comment
Mitch_A 26 February 2005 07:56:28 permanent link ]
 tlgtr wrote:
I want the lowest possible "ms" number possible...right?

As mentioned in a later post the Sony SDM-HS94P Xbrite is very, very nice.
12ms 800:1 though its somewhat pricey. Looks more like a CRT than a LCD.

Mitch
--
Remove "nospam." to reply.
SuSE 9.2 Pro KDE 3.3.2a
Add comment
Tiny Lund 27 February 2005 18:36:23 permanent link ]
 "I want the lowest possible "ms" number possible...right?"

You may also want to consider the highest possible resolution.

"tlgtr" <tlgtrprod@aol.com>­ wrote in message
news:1109360552.537­452.299730@f14g2000c­wb.googlegroups.com.­..>I want the lowest possible "ms" number possible...right?>


Add comment
Tlgtr 28 February 2005 20:03:16 permanent link ]
 Ended up with a Princeton 19" with 800:1 contrast and 25ms....(it
seemed in my research that the higher contrast came with a higher ms
number?) Seems OK....

Have to tweak the brightness up a little for nite tracks over what
seems the best for day tracks. If I want the better "ms number" I
would need to go to a 17". I have 14 days to play with it and be able
to return it... Any opinions appreciated...

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Open discussion > Flat Monitor Question #2 1 March 2005 21:30:16

see also:
NHRA-SM: Danny Gruninger preview
NASCAR-CUP: Michigan: Practice 1 times
NHRA-SM: VIPsports Joliet summary
pass tests:
see also:
96 jetta gl wont start, makes a weird…
dodge caravan 93
GMC Lift Kit

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .