What is "Friend entries"?
Does a Volvo 740 (2.3 injection) conversion require a Flashlube kit?
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Open discussion > Does a Volvo 740 (2.3 injection) conversion require a Flashlube kit? 6 May 2005 19:35:53

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Does a Volvo 740 (2.3 injection) conversion require a Flashlube kit?

Matthew Jenkins 24 April 2005 13:50:24
 I have a 87 Volvo 740 GLE with the B230E engine (2.3 injection) which I am
thinking of getting converted to take LPG.
Will it need a Flashlube kit?

Also, does anyone have any experience of a successful or unsuccessful
conversion of this model?

Thanks, Matthew


Add comment
Stewart Hargrave 24 April 2005 14:32:01 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 09:50:24 GMT, "Matthew Jenkins"
<noname@nomail.com>­ wrote:
I have a 87 Volvo 740 GLE with the B230E engine (2.3 injection) which I am>thinking of getting converted to take LPG.>Will it need a Flashlube kit?

No.
Also, does anyone have any experience of a successful or unsuccessful>conver­sion of this model?

www.hargrave.me.uk/­lpg/volvo740.htm

Only real problem is getting the air flow meter flap lifted out of the
way when you switch to LPG. There are, apparently, devices on the
market that will do the job, but I made my own.

--

TSH

For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials

LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k
Now with added Biodiesel
Add comment
Nathan Lucas 24 April 2005 16:10:05 permanent link ]
 my housemate has a 740 running on LPG. no flashlube kit, and never had a
problem.

is your's the K-jet injection?

"Matthew Jenkins" <noname@nomail.com>­ wrote in message
news:AZJae.2628$395­.2262@newsfe5-gui.nt­li.net...> I have a 87 Volvo 740 GLE with the B230E engine (2.3 injection) which I am> thinking of getting converted to take LPG.> Will it need a Flashlube kit?>
Also, does anyone have any experience of a successful or unsuccessful> conversion of this model?>
Thanks, Matthew>


Add comment
Nathan Lucas 24 April 2005 16:12:44 permanent link ]
 
"Stewart Hargrave" <SpamOnlyToHere@Mis­erableOldGit.Me.uk> wrote in message
news:7vsm61h16j5n9p­m1gelqqol86hpes7sga6­@4ax.com...> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 09:50:24 GMT, "Matthew Jenkins"> <noname@nomail.com>­ wrote:>
I have a 87 Volvo 740 GLE with the B230E engine (2.3 injection) which I
thinking of getting converted to take LPG.> >Will it need a Flashlube kit?>
No.>
Also, does anyone have any experience of a successful or unsuccessful> >conversion of this model?>
Only real problem is getting the air flow meter flap lifted out of the> way when you switch to LPG. There are, apparently, devices on the> market that will do the job, but I made my own.

why do you need to lift the airflow flap out of the way? not seen this on a
740 before.


Add comment
Stewart Hargrave 24 April 2005 19:13:25 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:12:44 GMT, "Nathan Lucas"
<lucas.autotrash@te­sco.net> wrote:
"Stewart Hargrave" <SpamOnlyToHere@Mis­erableOldGit.Me.uk> wrote in message>news:7vsm61­h16j5n9pm1gelqqol86h­pes7sga6@4ax.com...>­> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 09:50:24 GMT, "Matthew Jenkins">> <noname@nomail.com>­ wrote:>>
I have a 87 Volvo 740 GLE with the B230E engine (2.3 injection) which I>am>> >thinking of getting converted to take LPG.>> >Will it need a Flashlube kit?>>
No.>>
Also, does anyone have any experience of a successful or unsuccessful>> >conversion of this model?>>
Only real problem is getting the air flow meter flap lifted out of the>> way when you switch to LPG. There are, apparently, devices on the>> market that will do the job, but I made my own.>
why do you need to lift the airflow flap out of the way? not seen this on a>740 before.

If you put the mixer upstream of the flap, it makes no difference. But
it is preferable to have it as near to the throttle as possible[1],
and it will just squeeze in between the throttle body and air flow
meter flap. With it in this position, the airflow flap becomes an
obstruction to the flow through the venturi of the mixer - a bit like
a clogged air filter - so it needs to be pulled open to allow
unobstructed airflow.

I did start off mounting the mixer on the upstream spiggot of the air
flow meter, but in the early days (before I discovered how important
it is to have good HT components) I had a few backfires, and it seemed
unwise not to move it nearer the throttle. This probably results in a
couple of litres less of explosive mixture in the inlet tract.

On some K-Jet systems (other than Volvo), I am told it is possible to
connect a balance pipe to the open side of the vaporiser, so that the
vap. references the tract depression, between throttle and flap,
rather than the atmosphere, but I couldn't get this to work on the 740
- presumably because the configuration of throttle, mixer and flap is
just to restricted.

[1] I have seen a carburated 740 with the mixer attached to the air
filter box, about half a mile away from the manifold. The owner
reported no problems, but in the event of a backfire, there is going
to be a very big bang.



--

TSH

For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials

LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k
Now with added Biodiesel
Add comment
Matthew Jenkins 24 April 2005 21:36:08 permanent link ]
 Yes, I believe mine is K-jet and the same as Stewart Hargave's.

Do you know what make/model of equipment is fitted to your housemates car?

Thanks, Matthew

"Nathan Lucas" <lucas.autotrash@te­sco.net> wrote in message
news:x0Mae.3235$WW5­.1040@newsfe2-win.nt­li.net...> my housemate has a 740 running on LPG. no flashlube kit, and never had a> problem.>
is your's the K-jet injection?>
"Matthew Jenkins" <noname@nomail.com>­ wrote in message> news:AZJae.2628$395­.2262@newsfe5-gui.nt­li.net...> > I have a 87 Volvo 740 GLE with the B230E engine (2.3 injection) which I
thinking of getting converted to take LPG.> > Will it need a Flashlube kit?> >
Also, does anyone have any experience of a successful or unsuccessful> > conversion of this model?> >
Thanks, Matthew> >


Add comment
Austin Shackles 25 April 2005 00:07:45 permanent link ]
 On or around Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:13:25 +0100, Stewart Hargrave
<SpamOnlyToHere@Mis­erableOldGit.Me.uk> enlightened us thusly:
On some K-Jet systems (other than Volvo), I am told it is possible to>connect a balance pipe to the open side of the vaporiser, so that the>vap. references the tract depression, between throttle and flap,>rather than the atmosphere, but I couldn't get this to work on the 740>- presumably because the configuration of throttle, mixer and flap is>just to restricted.

works like that on my ford, but there's more space for it on that.

http://www.ddol-las­.fsnet.co.uk/car.htm­

the balance pipe comes off from the inlet via a ring just upstream of the
anti-backfire flap, and goes to the middle of the vap. The small hole in
the edge of the vap backplate has been welded up.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.­co.uk my opinions are just that
In Touch: Get in touch with yourself by touching yourself.
If somebody is watching, stop touching yourself.
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.
Add comment
Nathan Lucas 25 April 2005 01:40:12 permanent link ]
 it's a stako toroidal tank mounted in the spare wheel well, a stefanelli
'turbo' reducer (has a pipe that goes from the reducer to the airflow
meter - supposed to help make it smoother) and an AEB chanceover switch.

the petrol supply is switched with a relay that cuts power to the fuel pump,
and LPG is delivered to the mixer in the rubber cone thingy that the airflow
meter sits in. there is a bladesaver 'fart valve' (for want of a better
description) incorporated into the mixer to protect the airflow meter from
backfires
"Matthew Jenkins" <noname@nomail.com>­ wrote in message
news:cOQae.2714$395­.1294@newsfe5-gui.nt­li.net...> Yes, I believe mine is K-jet and the same as Stewart Hargave's.>
Do you know what make/model of equipment is fitted to your housemates car?>
Thanks, Matthew>
"Nathan Lucas" <lucas.autotrash@te­sco.net> wrote in message> news:x0Mae.3235$WW5­.1040@newsfe2-win.nt­li.net...> > my housemate has a 740 running on LPG. no flashlube kit, and never had
problem.> >
is your's the K-jet injection?> >
"Matthew Jenkins" <noname@nomail.com>­ wrote in message> > news:AZJae.2628$395­.2262@newsfe5-gui.nt­li.net...> > > I have a 87 Volvo 740 GLE with the B230E engine (2.3 injection) which
thinking of getting converted to take LPG.> > > Will it need a Flashlube kit?> > >
Also, does anyone have any experience of a successful or unsuccessful> > > conversion of this model?> > >
Thanks, Matthew> > >


Add comment
Stewart Hargrave 25 April 2005 14:31:56 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:40:12 GMT, "Nathan Lucas"
<lucas.autotrash@te­sco.net> wrote:
a stefanelli>'turbo' reducer (has a pipe that goes from the reducer to the airflow>meter - supposed to help make it smoother)

I wonder if this is a version of a 'balance pipe' setup that I
couldn't make work? I would be interested to know more about this. Are
you able to describe where the pipe connects at either end? Got any
pics?

--

TSH

For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials

LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k
Now with added Biodiesel
Add comment
Nathan Lucas 25 April 2005 23:13:29 permanent link ]
 the pipe goes from the 'atmosphere' side of the reducer to just above the
airflow meter. i think the basic idea is to try and give a smoother fuel
delivery. the reducer is designed to go on a turbocharged engine. this
pipe would normally be used to bias the reducer with pressure from the
turbo. i'll try and get you some pics when i get chance

"Stewart Hargrave" <SpamOnlyToHere@Mis­erableOldGit.Me.uk> wrote in message
news:kohp61hv01la8j­uaoor5v1okad4iktmhsa­@4ax.com...> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:40:12 GMT, "Nathan Lucas"> <lucas.autotrash@te­sco.net> wrote:>
a stefanelli> >'turbo' reducer (has a pipe that goes from the reducer to the airflow> >meter - supposed to help make it smoother)>
I wonder if this is a version of a 'balance pipe' setup that I> couldn't make work? I would be interested to know more about this. Are> you able to describe where the pipe connects at either end? Got any> pics?>
-->
For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials>
LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k> Now with added Biodiesel


Add comment
Stewart Hargrave 26 April 2005 22:36:47 permanent link ]
 On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:13:29 GMT, "Nathan Lucas"
<lucas.autotrash@te­sco.net> wrote:
the pipe goes from the 'atmosphere' side of the reducer to just above the>airflow meter. i think the basic idea is to try and give a smoother fuel>delivery. the reducer is designed to go on a turbocharged engine. this>pipe would normally be used to bias the reducer with pressure from the>turbo. i'll try and get you some pics when i get chance

That sounds like the 'balance pipe' idea as per Austin's Ford.
Presumably it works on this Volvo because it is a vaporiser intended
for use with a turbo.

Anybody got any idea how it differs from a normal reducer like mine?

I'm only asking out of interest - the flap lifting device I made works
very well, but I'd like to understand why the balance pipe arrangement
didn't work on mine.

--

TSH

For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials

LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k
Now with added Biodiesel
Add comment
Peter Hill 27 April 2005 00:20:34 permanent link ]
 On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:36:47 +0100, Stewart Hargrave
<SpamOnlyToHere@Mis­erableOldGit.Me.uk> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:13:29 GMT, "Nathan Lucas"><lucas.autot­rash@tesco.net> wrote:>
the pipe goes from the 'atmosphere' side of the reducer to just above the>>airflow meter. i think the basic idea is to try and give a smoother fuel>>delivery. the reducer is designed to go on a turbocharged engine. this>>pipe would normally be used to bias the reducer with pressure from the>>turbo. i'll try and get you some pics when i get chance>
That sounds like the 'balance pipe' idea as per Austin's Ford.>Presumably it works on this Volvo because it is a vaporiser intended>for use with a turbo. >
Anybody got any idea how it differs from a normal reducer like mine?

On turbos the fuel pressure regulator diaphragm has manifold pressure
applied to it instead of atmospheric pressure. This ensures the fuel
pressure across the fuel metering jet/mixer/injector is always the
pressure set by the spring. Without this a high pressure turbo engine
on full boost would blow air in to the fuel delivery hose from the
vapouriser. I think you can convert a normal regulator to turbo by
drilling and tapping the diaphragm cover for a hose tail, you have to
plug whatever port or hole they use to supply atmospheric pressure to
the diaphragm, or just open that hole up and tap it.

Add comment
Austin Shackles 27 April 2005 13:20:10 permanent link ]
 On or around Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:20:34 +0100, Peter Hill
<peter.usenet1@nosp­am.demon.co.uk> enlightened us thusly:
On turbos the fuel pressure regulator diaphragm has manifold pressure>applied to it instead of atmospheric pressure. This ensures the fuel>pressure across the fuel metering jet/mixer/injector is always the>pressure set by the spring. Without this a high pressure turbo engine>on full boost would blow air in to the fuel delivery hose from the>vapouriser. I think you can convert a normal regulator to turbo by>drilling and tapping the diaphragm cover for a hose tail, you have to>plug whatever port or hole they use to supply atmospheric pressure to>the diaphragm, or just open that hole up and tap it.

I've an idea that it needs resetting, too - mine won't run with the pipe
disconnected. Whether it's possible simply to adjust it, or whether the
bloke actually changed anything inside, I don't know. I'd have thought that
an OMVL E90 or such with external adjustment could be reset - I did once get
such a thing to run without the air filter (which was buggered), it didn't
run quite right, but run it did, by adjusting it a long way from the normal
position.




--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.­co.uk my opinions are just that
Confidence: Before important work meetings, boost your confidence by
reading a few pages from "The Tibetan Book of the Dead"
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.
Add comment
Nathan Lucas 5 May 2005 02:27:20 permanent link ]
 
That sounds like the 'balance pipe' idea as per Austin's Ford.> Presumably it works on this Volvo because it is a vaporiser intended> for use with a turbo.

yes, it is one intended for use with a turbo. the guy i got the kit from
said that this was the best thing to use on larger engines, and to be fair
to him it runs spot on :)­


Add comment
Steve Shuttleworth 5 May 2005 02:40:50 permanent link ]
 I expect the kit to convert my 740 to arrive tomorrow so I'm going to be
busy for a few days. I am intrigued by your flap lifting device and how you
made it. Is it electrically operated, did you use some sort of vacuum
solenoid or do you have a cable running inside the car?

Steve


"Stewart Hargrave" <SpamOnlyToHere@Mis­erableOldGit.Me.uk> wrote in message
news:v72t61d3llvf7o­vakj8ak6o80eqfhskogf­@4ax.com...> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:13:29 GMT, "Nathan Lucas"> <lucas.autotrash@te­sco.net> wrote:>
the pipe goes from the 'atmosphere' side of the reducer to just above the>>airflow meter. i think the basic idea is to try and give a smoother fuel>>delivery. the reducer is designed to go on a turbocharged engine. this>>pipe would normally be used to bias the reducer with pressure from the>>turbo. i'll try and get you some pics when i get chance>
That sounds like the 'balance pipe' idea as per Austin's Ford.> Presumably it works on this Volvo because it is a vaporiser intended> for use with a turbo.>
Anybody got any idea how it differs from a normal reducer like mine?>
I'm only asking out of interest - the flap lifting device I made works> very well, but I'd like to understand why the balance pipe arrangement> didn't work on mine.>
-- >
For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials>
LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k> Now with added Biodiesel


Add comment
Stewart Hargrave 5 May 2005 04:08:06 permanent link ]
 On Wed, 04 May 2005 22:40:50 GMT, "Steve Shuttleworth"
<steve.shuttleworth­@ntlworld.com> wrote:
I expect the kit to convert my 740 to arrive tomorrow so I'm going to be >busy for a few days. I am intrigued by your flap lifting device and how you >made it. Is it electrically operated, did you use some sort of vacuum >solenoid or do you have a cable running inside the car?

It's basically an electric motor that pulls on a bowden cable (bicycle
brake cable) that pulls up the arm of the air flow meter.

In fact there was quite a bit of work involved in making it, but most
of the parts came from Maplins. It's several years ago now, and I'm
stuggling to remember the details.

I mounted the motor in a metal box; it drives a worm and cog, which
does the pulling. But there are also a couple of micro switches,
tripped by a couple of cams mounted on the same shaft as the cog.
These operate in conjunction with a relay switch so that at full
deflection the power is cut, and at the same time the polarity is
reversed so that the motor will wind the other way and lower the flap
when I switch back to petrol.

I'll see if I can put together some pictures and more details on my
website. But I have been told by several people that there is (or was)
a device on the market especially for this - I believe it works from
manifold vacuum. Maybe your kit will include it, or have another way
round the situation. If not, it maybe worth asking a few kit suppliers
if they can find one - see sig. for a link to kit suppliers.

--

TSH

For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials

LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k
Now with added Biodiesel
Add comment
Steve Shuttleworth 6 May 2005 04:40:13 permanent link ]
 Hi Stewart

I fitted the gas venturi to the throttle housing tonight, which gave me the
chance to have a look at the air flow flap. I am very tempted to try the
car without any flap lifting device fitted. Logic tells me that the engine
is designed so that the flap lifts with a normal airflow, and the flap looks
like it will allow a fairly even current of air around its entire edge, so
the lpg venturi should work fairly well without a flap lifter. When you
fitted your device, did it make a significant difference?

Steve

"Stewart Hargrave" <SpamOnlyToHere@Mis­erableOldGit.Me.uk> wrote in message
news:krmi719rl7uml6­ge182nndn201m8c1jk14­@4ax.com...> On Wed, 04 May 2005 22:40:50 GMT, "Steve Shuttleworth"> <steve.shuttleworth­@ntlworld.com> wrote:>
I expect the kit to convert my 740 to arrive tomorrow so I'm going to be>>busy for a few days. I am intrigued by your flap lifting device and how >>you>>made it. Is it electrically operated, did you use some sort of vacuum>>solenoid or do you have a cable running inside the car?>
It's basically an electric motor that pulls on a bowden cable (bicycle> brake cable) that pulls up the arm of the air flow meter.>
In fact there was quite a bit of work involved in making it, but most> of the parts came from Maplins. It's several years ago now, and I'm> stuggling to remember the details.>
I mounted the motor in a metal box; it drives a worm and cog, which> does the pulling. But there are also a couple of micro switches,> tripped by a couple of cams mounted on the same shaft as the cog.> These operate in conjunction with a relay switch so that at full> deflection the power is cut, and at the same time the polarity is> reversed so that the motor will wind the other way and lower the flap> when I switch back to petrol.>
I'll see if I can put together some pictures and more details on my> website. But I have been told by several people that there is (or was)> a device on the market especially for this - I believe it works from> manifold vacuum. Maybe your kit will include it, or have another way> round the situation. If not, it maybe worth asking a few kit suppliers> if they can find one - see sig. for a link to kit suppliers.>
-- >
For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials>
LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k> Now with added Biodiesel


Add comment
Stewart Hargrave 6 May 2005 19:35:53 permanent link ]
 On Fri, 06 May 2005 00:40:13 GMT, "Steve Shuttleworth"
<steve.shuttleworth­@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Hi Stewart>
I fitted the gas venturi to the throttle housing tonight, which gave me the >chance to have a look at the air flow flap. I am very tempted to try the >car without any flap lifting device fitted. Logic tells me that the engine >is designed so that the flap lifts with a normal airflow, and the flap looks >like it will allow a fairly even current of air around its entire edge, so >the lpg venturi should work fairly well without a flap lifter. When you >fitted your device, did it make a significant difference?

Yes. It was impossible to set the mixture with the flap obstructing
the airflow - it was far too rich.

AIUI, the venturi effect means that the LPG vapour should be drawn
from the mixer by the flow of air through it. If the airway is
significantly obstructed, too much vapour will be drawn by the low
pressure in the inlet tract, rather than the flow of air.

I tried fitting a balance pipe as mentioned earlier in the thread, and
this resulted in a perfect idle, but the engine would not rev at all.
But it seems that different vaporisers behave differently to this.

My initial installation had the mixer mounted on the lower spigot of
the meter housing (with the flexi-tube that connects to the airbox),
and this worked well, but is less desirable because you are filling
more of the inlet tract with potentially damaging explosive mixture.
Having said that, with new HT leads, distributor cap, rotor arm and
plugs, backfires are extremely rare.

I seem to remember that at first, before I made the electric motor
device, I simply installed a bowden cable that ran to the inside of
the car and was a bit like an old fashioned choke cable - when I
switched to LPG I pulled the 'choke'. This worked perfectly well until
I made the electric lifter.

I've put together a page that shows more detail of the device I made.
I'll leave it up for a few weeks - make a copy if you want it for
future reference:
www.tshargrave.co.u­k/lifter_detail

--

TSH

For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my initials

LPG info. page: www.tshargrave.co.u­k
Now with added Biodiesel
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Open discussion > Does a Volvo 740 (2.3 injection) conversion require a Flashlube kit? 6 May 2005 19:35:53

see also:
DTM: Flat out to Dusseldorf
WOO: Brown pleased to fill in for…
USAC: CRA: Perris race broadcast…
pass tests:
see also:
help the hood of my 2005 camry wont…
1997 Chevy Cavalier sunroof problems
Chrysler Sebring 1998 LX Coupe

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .