How to find users with common interests?
camry or subaru?
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Open discussion > camry or subaru? 10 May 2005 05:02:25

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

camry or subaru?

Guest 6 May 2005 22:59:44
 between subaru (2005 LEGACY 2.5I SEDAN ) and toyota camry ( 2005 SE 4dr
Sedan OR LE 4dr Sedan), which one would you recommend?

Add comment
Mk IV 7 May 2005 01:52:23 permanent link ]
 amanda992004@yahoo.c­om <amanda992004@yahoo­.com> scribbled:
between subaru (2005 LEGACY 2.5I SEDAN ) and toyota camry ( 2005 SE> 4dr Sedan OR LE 4dr Sedan), which one would you recommend?

What engine in the Camry? The 2.4l 4 cyl. engine or the V6? What engine
for the Legacy? Turbo or no turbo?

With the 4cyl. engine, go with the Legacy, otherwise pick the Camry unless
you drive in the snow 6 months a year...


Add comment
Rick Courtright 7 May 2005 02:16:23 permanent link ]
 amanda992004@yahoo.c­om wrote:>
between subaru (2005 LEGACY 2.5I SEDAN ) and toyota camry ( 2005 SE 4dr> Sedan OR LE 4dr Sedan), which one would you recommend?

Hi,

What are you looking for? While these are both 4 door sedans, I think
the similarities start to fade quickly from there!

Do you NEED AWD? If so, there's no question. A lot of that depends on
where you're located. I'm in SoCal, and have an older Subie that was
built when they were still 4wd (switchable.) In the 6 1/2 years and
150k+ miles I've put on it, the times it's been in 4wd cuz it was TRULY
needed can be counted on one hand. BUT, as the TV ads say, when those
times came it was "priceless." If you live in snow country, your
experience will be a whole different thing from mine! And, if you live
where you might see dirt roads, the Camry SE is not the car to have
unless you like the sound of stuff dragging the underside. I'm not sure,
but I think the LE sits a little higher.

OTOH, there are fewer Subies made, sold and serviced here in the US than
Camries (forgetting that Toyota makes other cars & trucks, and a single
large and well-known Toyota dealer in the LA area probably sells as many
Toyotas in a year as all the Subie dealers in the whole state), so the
availability of parts and service stands in Toyota's favor. Prices for
parts for either make are outrageous, but IME Toyota's parts pipeline is
something Subaru can only look at in awe. Toyota's dealer service is no
bargain--I do all my own work on my Subie so I can't speak to dealer
service there, just parts.

Now, if you like the greater room and other "selling points" of the
Camry, I'd suggest you go with one of the 4 cyl models. No, they don't
have the power of the V-6, but they also get FAR better fuel economy,
are much easier to work on, and should cost you less to maintain as a
result. Toyota's 4 cyl engines are historically more oil tight than
their V-6es, too. The V-6 shares one of Subie's shortcomings: almost all
oil leaks lead straight to the exhaust system with attendant smoke and
smells, and trust me, their V-6es DO leak! A good home wrench can pretty
much take care of a 4 cyl--the V-6 is an exercise in frustration.

BTW, I also own an earlier V-6 Camry SE in addition to my Subie, so I
have no particular flag to wave here. They're different cars that serve
different needs IMO.

Rick
Add comment
Indirecto 8 May 2005 02:16:12 permanent link ]
 Why do you recommend the Legacy 4cyl, but not the H6?

Curious.



"MK IV" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:F6udnWVp0_a7eu­bfRVn-rg@igs.net...>­ amanda992004@yahoo.­com <amanda992004@yahoo­.com> scribbled:>
between subaru (2005 LEGACY 2.5I SEDAN ) and toyota camry ( 2005 SE>> 4dr Sedan OR LE 4dr Sedan), which one would you recommend?>
What engine in the Camry? The 2.4l 4 cyl. engine or the V6? What engine > for the Legacy? Turbo or no turbo?>
With the 4cyl. engine, go with the Legacy, otherwise pick the Camry unless > you drive in the snow 6 months a year...>


Add comment
Bonehenge 8 May 2005 04:00:02 permanent link ]
 On Sat, 7 May 2005 18:16:12 -0400, "Indirecto" <indirecto@hotmail.­com>
wrote:
Why do you recommend the Legacy 4cyl, but not the H6?

The H6 is a waste. It's heavier and uses more fuel, and the required
automatic tranny swallows some power. A 5 speed manual H4 has the
same feel, better mileage, and a longer track record.

The Subie AT mated to the '00-'02 4 is a true slush bucket. I don't
know if the '03-on cars are better, since I've not driven them.

Barry
Add comment
Guest 8 May 2005 07:59:39 permanent link ]
 
Rick Courtright wrote:> amanda992004@yahoo.­com wrote:> >
between subaru (2005 LEGACY 2.5I SEDAN ) and toyota camry ( 2005 SE
Sedan OR LE 4dr Sedan), which one would you recommend?>
Hi,>
What are you looking for? While these are both 4 door sedans, I think> the similarities start to fade quickly from there!>
Do you NEED AWD? If so, there's no question. A lot of that depends on> where you're located. I'm in SoCal,

I am in Northern California - not San Francisco or Bay area - where it
gets quite hot in the summer. I will never live in really cold plcaes
(snowy places) like Colorado.
and have an older Subie that was> built when they were still 4wd (switchable.) In the 6 1/2 years and> 150k+ miles I've put on it, the times it's been in 4wd cuz it was
TRULY> needed can be counted on one hand. BUT, as the TV ads say, when those> times came it was "priceless." If you live in snow country, your> experience will be a whole different thing from mine! And, if you
live> where you might see dirt roads, the Camry SE is not the car to have> unless you like the sound of stuff dragging the underside.
I'm not sure,> but I think the LE sits a little higher.

I see. I can't see myself to be living in the area with dirt road int
he near future, in fact, probaby never.
OTOH, there are fewer Subies made, sold and serviced here in the US
than> Camries (forgetting that Toyota makes other cars & trucks, and a
single> large and well-known Toyota dealer in the LA area probably sells as
many> Toyotas in a year as all the Subie dealers in the whole state), so
the availability of parts and service stands in Toyota's favor.

I have heard about that.
Prices for> parts for either make are outrageous, but IME Toyota's parts pipeline
something Subaru can only look at in awe.

Good to know.
Toyota's dealer service is no> bargain--I do all my own work on my Subie so I can't speak to dealer> service there, just parts.>
Now, if you like the greater room and other "selling points" of the> Camry, I'd suggest you go with one of the 4 cyl models.

I do prefer greater room.
No, they don't> have the power of the V-6, but they also get FAR better fuel economy,> are much easier to work on, and should cost you less to maintain as a> result.

Okay.
Toyota's 4 cyl engines are historically more oil tight than> their V-6es, too. The V-6 shares one of Subie's shortcomings: almost
oil leaks lead straight to the exhaust system with attendant smoke
smells, and trust me, their V-6es DO leak! A good home wrench can
pretty> much take care of a 4 cyl--the V-6 is an exercise in frustration.

Oil leak is something I'd be scared off. Thanks for letting me know.
BTW, I also own an earlier V-6 Camry SE in addition to my Subie, so I> have no particular flag to wave here. They're different cars that
serve> different needs IMO.>
Rick

It seems that living in Sacramento, Camry would be less costly
maintencance- wise, am I right?

Add comment
Jim Stewart 8 May 2005 10:01:48 permanent link ]
 amanda992004@yahoo.c­om wrote:> Rick Courtright wrote:>
amanda992004@yaho­o.com wrote:>>
between subaru (2005 LEGACY 2.5I SEDAN ) and toyota camry ( 2005 SE>
Sedan OR LE 4dr Sedan), which one would you recommend?>>
Hi,>>
What are you looking for? While these are both 4 door sedans, I think>>the similarities start to fade quickly from there!>>
Do you NEED AWD? If so, there's no question. A lot of that depends on>>where you're located. I'm in SoCal,>
I am in Northern California - not San Francisco or Bay area - where it> gets quite hot in the summer. I will never live in really cold plcaes> (snowy places) like Colorado.>
and have an older Subie that was>>built when they were still 4wd (switchable.) In the 6 1/2 years and>>150k+ miles I've put on it, the times it's been in 4wd cuz it was>
TRULY>
needed can be counted on one hand. BUT, as the TV ads say, when those>>times came it was "priceless." If you live in snow country, your>>experience will be a whole different thing from mine! And, if you>
live>
where you might see dirt roads, the Camry SE is not the car to have>>unless you like the sound of stuff dragging the underside.>
I'm not sure,>>but I think the LE sits a little higher.>
I see. I can't see myself to be living in the area with dirt road int> he near future, in fact, probaby never.>
OTOH, there are fewer Subies made, sold and serviced here in the US>
than>
Camries (forgetting that Toyota makes other cars & trucks, and a>
single>
large and well-known Toyota dealer in the LA area probably sells as>
many>
Toyotas in a year as all the Subie dealers in the whole state), so>
the availability of parts and service stands in Toyota's favor.>
I have heard about that.>
Prices for>>parts for either make are outrageous, but IME Toyota's parts pipeline>
something Subaru can only look at in awe.>
Good to know.>
Toyota's dealer service is no>>bargain--I do all my own work on my Subie so I can't speak to dealer>>service there, just parts.>>
Now, if you like the greater room and other "selling points" of the>>Camry, I'd suggest you go with one of the 4 cyl models.>
I do prefer greater room.>
No, they don't>>have the power of the V-6, but they also get FAR better fuel economy,>>are much easier to work on, and should cost you less to maintain as a>>result.>
Okay.>
Toyota's 4 cyl engines are historically more oil tight than>>their V-6es, too. The V-6 shares one of Subie's shortcomings: almost>
oil leaks lead straight to the exhaust system with attendant smoke>
smells, and trust me, their V-6es DO leak! A good home wrench can>
pretty>
much take care of a 4 cyl--the V-6 is an exercise in frustration.>
Oil leak is something I'd be scared off. Thanks for letting me know.>
BTW, I also own an earlier V-6 Camry SE in addition to my Subie, so I>>have no particular flag to wave here. They're different cars that>
serve>
different needs IMO.>>
Rick>
It seems that living in Sacramento, Camry would be less costly> maintencance- wise, am I right?>

I don't know how *any* car could be less costly
than my '99 Outback has been. I bought it new,
it has 109k miles on it and it has costed me $700
in maintainance, including brakes.

I live in Davis and make a couple trips a week
into Sacramento so my driving is quite similar
to yours.

BTW, after helping my wife buy her WRX there, I
recommend Auburn Subaru. We have not been
impressed with either of the Sacramento Subaru
dealers.



Add comment
Indirecto 8 May 2005 13:59:24 permanent link ]
 I saw in an auto-show a manual H6 subaru... looked real nice.

Is the tranny really such the power sucker?

(btw, what is a "true slush bucket"?)




"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_new­sgroup_please@aol.co­m> wrote in message
news:sblq711qjf6p7b­nhmblakfn79rnojk470f­@4ax.com...> On Sat, 7 May 2005 18:16:12 -0400, "Indirecto" <indirecto@hotmail.­com>> wrote:>
Why do you recommend the Legacy 4cyl, but not the H6?>
The H6 is a waste. It's heavier and uses more fuel, and the required> automatic tranny swallows some power. A 5 speed manual H4 has the> same feel, better mileage, and a longer track record.>
The Subie AT mated to the '00-'02 4 is a true slush bucket. I don't> know if the '03-on cars are better, since I've not driven them.>
Barry


Add comment
Bonehenge 8 May 2005 15:11:11 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 8 May 2005 05:59:24 -0400, "Indirecto" <indirecto@hotmail.­com>
wrote:
I saw in an auto-show a manual H6 subaru... looked real nice.>
Is the tranny really such the power sucker?

I examples I've driven seemed to be. Back in '01, the 6 was 212 HP,
while the 4 was 165. The 6 only felt more powerful if compared with a
4 mated to the AT. I felt little difference between a 4 with the MT,
and the 6 with an AT, other than a lack of driver effort to shift.
Newer versions may be better, I haven't compared them lately.

A manual on the 6 would be nice!
(btw, what is a "true slush bucket"?)

"Slush Bucket" is the nickname for a vague, mushy feeling automatic
tranny. Not all AT's are slush buckets, but the '05 Chevy Malibu I
recently rented redefined the term! <G>

Add comment
Bonehenge 8 May 2005 15:47:05 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 08 May 2005 04:22:27 GMT, "bicycle\(Mr. R. White\)"
<bicycle@charter.ne­t> wrote:
There is NO comparsion between Subaru and Toyota when it comes to>reliability, costs and long term investment.

I've owned both, so here's my take, some of which is locally flavored:

Toyota has taken reliability and owner serviceability to the point of
boredom. I find Toyotas to be the most user serviceable going. My
new truck even has the oil filter located at the front, top of the
engine, where it drains when the engine is not running. My Outback's
isn't bad, but the Toy is far better. Other services show the Toyota
as hands-down better in all serviceability respects. Toyota even
includes paperwork that tells you how to self-service the vehicle and
still maintain warranty coverage.

My Outback is the best snow car I've _EVER_ been in, this is compared
to 4x4 trucks, cars, SUV's Wranglers, you name it. The car simply
lives for New England snowstorms. I've also found the OBW to be very
comfortable on long trips, it's quiet, safe, roomy, rides nice, etc...
It even tows a 1500 pound enclosed trailer nicely. This is why states
like Vermont and New Hampshire are crawling with Subaru's.

I usually don't like to deal with dealerships, but my local Toyota
dealers gladly match online parts prices, so I can use OEM parts for
chain store copy prices. They even carry the better aftermarket
stuff, like K&N filters, Borla exhausts, etc... They don't cry about
quality aftermarket items voiding warranties. My local Subaru
dealer's service departments are slime, famous for $500 lube /
inspection jobs, MSRP parts, and warranty work on the customer. These
guys (and a woman) might even tell you that Mobil 1 might void the
warranty, when the manual specifically gives synthetic oil info! The
mechanics are very good at what they do, but their bosses suck.

When buying new cars, the (3) local Subaru dealers all used tactics
similar to those mentioned in "Confessions of a Car Salesman" on
edmunds.com, the Toyota folks were extremely easy and honest to deal
with. The boob-implanted, skin tight top wearing F&I woman who
signed my paperwork spent 30 minutes bragging about "her" Outback".
It turns out that she actually drives an H2. <G>

ANYONE will fix a Toyota, some independent shops aren't interested in,
or all that good at working on Subies. The Subie guys are out there,
but you'll have to find them. Places like Vermont have them on every
corner, shops in Florida may look at you like you just pulled in a
Studebaker. Typical long-term service jobs like clutches and timing
belts are far more involved and expensive on the Subie than a Toyota.
Remember, an AWD car of any brand is more complex than a 2WD. All
current Subarus are AWD, so they kind of lose on this category, unless
it's a rare AWD 'Yota that you're comparing.

My bottom line:

Lots of bad weather, light towing, or you need to use the inside like
a mini-truck, AND ** you're very good about scheduled maintenance and
the local mechanic network is there**. Get the Subaru.

You kind of want to drive it into the ground, the weather's not a
factor, you rarely, if ever leave pavement. The Camry is the way to
go.

Add comment
Guest 9 May 2005 00:50:22 permanent link ]
 
We have not been impressed with either of the Sacramento Subaru
dealers.

Thanks for the info.

Add comment
Guest 9 May 2005 00:53:17 permanent link ]
 
in your choice of a long term automotive investment, my money is on
the Toyota.

Thanks. Living in this city and considering the miantence cost
involved, I should go for Toyota: 4 cyl (not V6) Camry LE 4dr Sudan. I
think.

Add comment
Earle Jones 10 May 2005 05:02:25 permanent link ]
 In article <1115524779.567069.­260630@o13g2000cwo.g­ooglegroups.com>,
amanda992004@yahoo.­com wrote:
Rick Courtright wrote:> > amanda992004@yahoo.­com wrote:> > >
between subaru (2005 LEGACY 2.5I SEDAN ) and toyota camry ( 2005 SE> 4dr> > > Sedan OR LE 4dr Sedan), which one would you recommend?

[...clip...]

*
My two cents: Take a look at the '05 Toyota Prius. It gets about
48 MPG compared to around 24 for the Camry or Subaru. The Prius
battery and in fact, the whole electric drive train, is guaranteed
(in California) for 150,000 miles and ten years. In addition, there
is a $2,000 federal tax deduction if you buy it this year.

In a year or two, the Camry hybrid will hit the market ('07, I
think.)

I have an '05 Prius (and an '01 Subaru Outback wagon) and I cannot
imagine ever buying another car that is not a hybrid.

earle
*
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Open discussion > camry or subaru? 10 May 2005 05:02:25

see also:
Timing Chain
ALUMINUM RADIATOR?
pass tests:
see also:
2001 VW Passat
Peugeot 306 Diesel
'92 Olds Trofeo

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .