What is a "Foreword" to a blog?
Depreciation Curve Of Japanese Cars vs American Cars
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Open discussion > Depreciation Curve Of Japanese Cars vs American Cars 2 May 2005 22:06:42

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Depreciation Curve Of Japanese Cars vs American Cars

D.D. Palmer 27 April 2005 15:17:07
 There is another thread about new Lexus and Toyota models that has just run
too long. Accordingly, I wanted to spin off that conversation with a new
thread. There was discussion about buying Lexus versus Lincoln. One of the
things that I realized is that, more or less, Toyota/Honda vehicles are
priced by the market, both new and used, as if the car will last 150,000
miles while American vehicles are generally priced as if the vehicles will
last 100,000 miles. Meaning that at 50,000MI, a Honda/Toyota will still be
worth about 2/3 of the original price while an American vehicle will be
worth about half. This is merely a very rough rule of thumb, but something
I've noticed. Even new, the US vehicles can't be sold unless Detroit rebates
it's way to a sale, so the "out the door" price is much less than the "out
the door" price of a Toy/Hon. Even though the sticker prices are similar.
Again, this seems to reflect that the market assumes the Toy/Hon will go
150,000 miles before major trouble vs merely 100,000 for the US vehicle. My
point is that buying similar sized-categorized vehicles from Toy/Hon vs US
is no longer an apples to apples comparison. (I realize that many vehicles
go 200,000 to 300,000 miles...maybe more....of both American and Japanese
build. But my point is that THE MARKET prices Toy/Hon vehicles to last about
50% longer).



Add comment
Guest 28 April 2005 15:23:41 permanent link ]
 You're discussion seems to be based on the premise that buyers of
Lexus's and Lincoln's are primarily affected by price; the amount of
time a car lasts being, to a large degree, about price.

I would contend that resale value/price is not a MAJOR factor to
buyers of these cars. In my case the reasons I went with an LS430
were about how the car feels while driving, power, quiet, luxury
features, and reliability. Good resale value was a plus, but not a
deciding factor.

One could argue that reliability is also a price issue, but it's more
about feeling safe and knowing that you're not going be stranded or
have to schlep to the dealer a lot.

HBH

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:17:07 -0400, "D.D. Palmer"
<ddpalmer@hotmail.c­om> wrote:
There is another thread about new Lexus and Toyota models that has just run >too long. Accordingly, I wanted to spin off that conversation with a new >thread. There was discussion about buying Lexus versus Lincoln. One of the >things that I realized is that, more or less, Toyota/Honda vehicles are >priced by the market, both new and used, as if the car will last 150,000 >miles while American vehicles are generally priced as if the vehicles will >last 100,000 miles. Meaning that at 50,000MI, a Honda/Toyota will still be >worth about 2/3 of the original price while an American vehicle will be >worth about half. This is merely a very rough rule of thumb, but something >I've noticed. Even new, the US vehicles can't be sold unless Detroit rebates >it's way to a sale, so the "out the door" price is much less than the "out >the door" price of a Toy/Hon. Even though the sticker prices are similar. >Again, this seems to reflect that the market assumes the Toy/Hon will go >150,000 miles before major trouble vs merely 100,000 for the US vehicle. My >point is that buying similar sized-categorized vehicles from Toy/Hon vs US >is no longer an apples to apples comparison. (I realize that many vehicles >go 200,000 to 300,000 miles...maybe more....of both American and Japanese >build. But my point is that THE MARKET prices Toy/Hon vehicles to last about >50% longer).>

Add comment
D.D. Palmer 28 April 2005 20:50:56 permanent link ]
 There are MANY reasons people choose Lexus over Lincoln or Bentley over
Lexus or Ford over Chevy. My point was that at any level, the American car
depreciates at a rate as if it will last about 100,000 miles while the
residual value/resale price of most Toyota/Honda products depreciates at a
rate as if there are 150,000 miles.


<BenAndMarsha@mail.­com> wrote in message
news:d4h171h4jvjed9­9o9rc5t955cq2cenbma4­@4ax.com...> You're discussion seems to be based on the premise that buyers of> Lexus's and Lincoln's are primarily affected by price; the amount of> time a car lasts being, to a large degree, about price.>
I would contend that resale value/price is not a MAJOR factor to> buyers of these cars. In my case the reasons I went with an LS430> were about how the car feels while driving, power, quiet, luxury> features, and reliability. Good resale value was a plus, but not a> deciding factor.>
One could argue that reliability is also a price issue, but it's more> about feeling safe and knowing that you're not going be stranded or> have to schlep to the dealer a lot.>
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:17:07 -0400, "D.D. Palmer"> <ddpalmer@hotmail.c­om> wrote:>
There is another thread about new Lexus and Toyota models that has just >>run>>too long. Accordingly, I wanted to spin off that conversation with a new>>thread. There was discussion about buying Lexus versus Lincoln. One of the>>things that I realized is that, more or less, Toyota/Honda vehicles are>>priced by the market, both new and used, as if the car will last 150,000>>miles while American vehicles are generally priced as if the vehicles will>>last 100,000 miles. Meaning that at 50,000MI, a Honda/Toyota will still be>>worth about 2/3 of the original price while an American vehicle will be>>worth about half. This is merely a very rough rule of thumb, but something>>I've noticed. Even new, the US vehicles can't be sold unless Detroit >>rebates>>it's way to a sale, so the "out the door" price is much less than the "out>>the door" price of a Toy/Hon. Even though the sticker prices are similar.>>Again, this seems to reflect that the market assumes the Toy/Hon will go>>150,000 miles before major trouble vs merely 100,000 for the US vehicle. >>My>>point is that buying similar sized-categorized vehicles from Toy/Hon vs US>>is no longer an apples to apples comparison. (I realize that many vehicles>>go 200,000 to 300,000 miles...maybe more....of both American and Japanese>>build. But my point is that THE MARKET prices Toy/Hon vehicles to last >>about>>50% longer).>>


Add comment
Guest 29 April 2005 05:28:29 permanent link ]
 On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:50:56 -0400, "D.D. Palmer"
<ddpalmer@hotmail.c­om> wrote:
There are MANY reasons people choose Lexus over Lincoln or Bentley over >Lexus or Ford over Chevy. My point was that at any level, the American car >depreciates at a rate as if it will last about 100,000 miles while the >residual value/resale price of most Toyota/Honda products depreciates at a >rate as if there are 150,000 miles.

I think you are being WAAAY too conservative. Even a Honda Civic is
expected to go 200K miles without serious problems. For the last 15
years or so Toyota and Honda products have been perceived as 200K mile
type of cars because they ARE 200K mile cars. Everybody I've talked
to ( including mechanics ) feel that way.

Right or wrong , American cars are *perceived* to be completely shot
at 100K or 10 years old. Note: In the Bay Area people can and do keep
cars of all types for as long as 15 years because there are no weather
factors to corrode metal and rubber. Still , American cars are
perceived as 100K mile cars and the major Japanese as 200K mile cars.

A 10 year old Lexus LS400 with 150K in clean condition still has
resale value around here. An American luxury car with the same age ,
condition and miles is worth little more than salvage value.








<BenAndMarsha@mail­.com> wrote in message >news:d4h171h4jvjed­99o9rc5t955cq2cenbma­4@4ax.com...>> You're discussion seems to be based on the premise that buyers of>> Lexus's and Lincoln's are primarily affected by price; the amount of>> time a car lasts being, to a large degree, about price.>>
I would contend that resale value/price is not a MAJOR factor to>> buyers of these cars. In my case the reasons I went with an LS430>> were about how the car feels while driving, power, quiet, luxury>> features, and reliability. Good resale value was a plus, but not a>> deciding factor.>>
One could argue that reliability is also a price issue, but it's more>> about feeling safe and knowing that you're not going be stranded or>> have to schlep to the dealer a lot.>>
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:17:07 -0400, "D.D. Palmer">> <ddpalmer@hotmail.c­om> wrote:>>
There is another thread about new Lexus and Toyota models that has just >>>run>>>too long. Accordingly, I wanted to spin off that conversation with a new>>>thread. There was discussion about buying Lexus versus Lincoln. One of the>>>things that I realized is that, more or less, Toyota/Honda vehicles are>>>priced by the market, both new and used, as if the car will last 150,000>>>miles while American vehicles are generally priced as if the vehicles will>>>last 100,000 miles. Meaning that at 50,000MI, a Honda/Toyota will still be>>>worth about 2/3 of the original price while an American vehicle will be>>>worth about half. This is merely a very rough rule of thumb, but something>>>I've noticed. Even new, the US vehicles can't be sold unless Detroit >>>rebates>>>it's way to a sale, so the "out the door" price is much less than the "out>>>the door" price of a Toy/Hon. Even though the sticker prices are similar.>>>Again, this seems to reflect that the market assumes the Toy/Hon will go>>>150,000 miles before major trouble vs merely 100,000 for the US vehicle. >>>My>>>point is that buying similar sized-categorized vehicles from Toy/Hon vs US>>>is no longer an apples to apples comparison. (I realize that many vehicles>>>go 200,000 to 300,000 miles...maybe more....of both American and Japanese>>>build. But my point is that THE MARKET prices Toy/Hon vehicles to last >>>about>>>50% longer).>>>

Add comment
D.D. Palmer 29 April 2005 14:19:28 permanent link ]
 You are generally right! That being said, the market premium for Japanese
cars over similar US vehicles is not double. So you could argue that the
Japanese car is the better value, as you are getting double the
mileage-per-car as an American vehicle while paying only about 20% more
(give or take) for similar vehicles. Hey, maybe that's why Toyota is gushing
in profits while GM and Ford are on deathwatch!

<X@X.COM> wrote in message
news:jq1371d1dgkpkk­em0rbl3ianb8koohpk0r­@4ax.com...> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:50:56 -0400, "D.D. Palmer"> <ddpalmer@hotmail.c­om> wrote:>
There are MANY reasons people choose Lexus over Lincoln or Bentley over>>Lexus or Ford over Chevy. My point was that at any level, the American car>>depreciates at a rate as if it will last about 100,000 miles while the>>residual value/resale price of most Toyota/Honda products depreciates at a>>rate as if there are 150,000 miles.>
I think you are being WAAAY too conservative. Even a Honda Civic is> expected to go 200K miles without serious problems. For the last 15> years or so Toyota and Honda products have been perceived as 200K mile> type of cars because they ARE 200K mile cars. Everybody I've talked> to ( including mechanics ) feel that way.>
Right or wrong , American cars are *perceived* to be completely shot> at 100K or 10 years old. Note: In the Bay Area people can and do keep> cars of all types for as long as 15 years because there are no weather> factors to corrode metal and rubber. Still , American cars are> perceived as 100K mile cars and the major Japanese as 200K mile cars.>
A 10 year old Lexus LS400 with 150K in clean condition still has> resale value around here. An American luxury car with the same age ,> condition and miles is worth little more than salvage value.>
<BenAndMarsha@mai­l.com> wrote in message>>news:d4h17­1h4jvjed99o9rc5t955c­q2cenbma4@4ax.com...­>>> You're discussion seems to be based on the premise that buyers of>>> Lexus's and Lincoln's are primarily affected by price; the amount of>>> time a car lasts being, to a large degree, about price.>>>
I would contend that resale value/price is not a MAJOR factor to>>> buyers of these cars. In my case the reasons I went with an LS430>>> were about how the car feels while driving, power, quiet, luxury>>> features, and reliability. Good resale value was a plus, but not a>>> deciding factor.>>>
One could argue that reliability is also a price issue, but it's more>>> about feeling safe and knowing that you're not going be stranded or>>> have to schlep to the dealer a lot.>>>
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:17:07 -0400, "D.D. Palmer">>> <ddpalmer@hotmail.c­om> wrote:>>>
There is another thread about new Lexus and Toyota models that has just>>>>run>>>>too long. Accordingly, I wanted to spin off that conversation with a new>>>>thread. There was discussion about buying Lexus versus Lincoln. One of >>>>the>>>>things that I realized is that, more or less, Toyota/Honda vehicles are>>>>priced by the market, both new and used, as if the car will last 150,000>>>>miles while American vehicles are generally priced as if the vehicles >>>>will>>>>last 100,000 miles. Meaning that at 50,000MI, a Honda/Toyota will still >>>>be>>>>worth about 2/3 of the original price while an American vehicle will be>>>>worth about half. This is merely a very rough rule of thumb, but >>>>something>>>>I'­ve noticed. Even new, the US vehicles can't be sold unless Detroit>>>>rebates>­>>>it's way to a sale, so the "out the door" price is much less than the >>>>"out>>>>the door" price of a Toy/Hon. Even though the sticker prices are >>>>similar.>>>>Aga­in, this seems to reflect that the market assumes the Toy/Hon will go>>>>150,000 miles before major trouble vs merely 100,000 for the US vehicle.>>>>My>>>>p­oint is that buying similar sized-categorized vehicles from Toy/Hon vs >>>>US>>>>is no longer an apples to apples comparison. (I realize that many >>>>vehicles>>>>go 200,000 to 300,000 miles...maybe more....of both American and >>>>Japanese>>>>bui­ld. But my point is that THE MARKET prices Toy/Hon vehicles to last>>>>about>>>>50­% longer).>>>>


Add comment
Me 2 May 2005 22:06:42 permanent link ]
 I made the decision to buy my GS430 based on:
1) Driving the car and comparing it to the Lincoln LS, the Audi's (A6 and
A8) The BMW's (M3, 525, 540 and 740's) and the MB E320. Eliminated the LS
early on, drove three of them finding the noise level unacceptable. The
comparison between the German cars was harder but I still kept coming back
to the Lexus.
2) Reliability ratings. I am a network admin in a law firm. A lot of the
Lawyers drive the big three German cars. Quizzing them about how often their
cars are in for, and what the service bills are, again, the Lexus was far
superior in this regard.
3) Resale value. This wasn't really a factor, as I tend to keep cars a long
time.

I have owned Fords for the past 30 years. My son talked me into at least
considering other brands. I am really glad I listened.

I also test drove a Ford 500. What an absolute POS.



"D.D. Palmer" <ddpalmer@hotmail.c­om> wrote in message
news:xKSdnZISwfQv6f­LfRVn-3w@comcast.com­...> There is another thread about new Lexus and Toyota models that has just
too long. Accordingly, I wanted to spin off that conversation with a new> thread. There was discussion about buying Lexus versus Lincoln. One of the> things that I realized is that, more or less, Toyota/Honda vehicles are> priced by the market, both new and used, as if the car will last 150,000> miles while American vehicles are generally priced as if the vehicles will> last 100,000 miles. Meaning that at 50,000MI, a Honda/Toyota will still be> worth about 2/3 of the original price while an American vehicle will be> worth about half. This is merely a very rough rule of thumb, but something> I've noticed. Even new, the US vehicles can't be sold unless Detroit
rebates> it's way to a sale, so the "out the door" price is much less than the "out> the door" price of a Toy/Hon. Even though the sticker prices are similar.> Again, this seems to reflect that the market assumes the Toy/Hon will go> 150,000 miles before major trouble vs merely 100,000 for the US vehicle.
point is that buying similar sized-categorized vehicles from Toy/Hon vs US> is no longer an apples to apples comparison. (I realize that many vehicles> go 200,000 to 300,000 miles...maybe more....of both American and Japanese> build. But my point is that THE MARKET prices Toy/Hon vehicles to last
about> 50% longer).>


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Open discussion > Depreciation Curve Of Japanese Cars vs American Cars 2 May 2005 22:06:42

see also:
CAMRY Auto Gearbox ?
1996 Toyota Camry Check Engine Light
Follow-Up - Problem...
pass tests:
see also:
how to replace the power steering p...
always had problems with the dodge ...

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .