How to avoid pre-moderation of my comments?
Gas prices and alternative fuels -- two questions
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Chrysler > Gas prices and alternative fuels -- two questions 3 May 2005 19:50:18

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Gas prices and alternative fuels -- two questions

Percival P. Cassidy 25 April 2005 23:38:25
 1. Who is actually getting the extra money for crude oil as the price
increases? Undoubtedly some of the increase goes to the governments of
the oil-producing countries, but do they get all of it? Or are the
oil-exploration companies getting some of that increase as well? Could
it be, for example, that XYZ Petroleum Distribution, Inc. is telling us
that they are having to raise prices because they are paying more for
crude, when in fact part of the increased price is swelling the coffers
of XYZ Oil Exploration Corp. (a foreign-registered division of the same
multinational)?

2. One reason there is an increased interest in LNG-powered vehicles is
that fuel is cheaper. What taxes are included in the price of LNG? Is
LNG for motor vehicles priced/taxed the same as LNG for heating? I am
asking because I am sure I recall that, about 20 years or more ago in
Australia, as LNG became more popular as a motor-vehicle fuel (e.g., I
recall that most taxis and many other commercial fleets in Brisbane were
using LNG), so the taxes on it were increased? Couldn't the same thing
happen elsewhere, thus tending to wipe out the cost advantage?

Perce
Add comment
Dori A Schmetterling 26 April 2005 01:46:29 permanent link ]
 You can bet your shirt on it. LPG taxes in the UK will rise if many people
use it. Already some of its tax advantage is set to end in, I think, two
years.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.ne­t> wrote in message
news:RGbbe.20895$Ow­2.5850@fe06.lga...
[...]
(e.g., I recall that most taxis and many other commercial fleets in > Brisbane were using LNG), so the taxes on it were increased? Couldn't the > same thing happen elsewhere, thus tending to wipe out the cost advantage?>
Perce


Add comment
Greg 29 April 2005 07:51:20 permanent link ]
 "Percival P. Cassidy" wrote:
1. Who is actually getting the extra money for crude oil as the price> increases? Undoubtedly some of the increase goes to the governments of> the oil-producing countries, but do they get all of it? Or are the> oil-exploration companies getting some of that increase as well? Could> it be, for example, that XYZ Petroleum Distribution, Inc. is telling us> that they are having to raise prices because they are paying more for> crude, when in fact part of the increased price is swelling the coffers> of XYZ Oil Exploration Corp. (a foreign-registered division of the same> multinational)?>
2. One reason there is an increased interest in LNG-powered vehicles is> that fuel is cheaper. What taxes are included in the price of LNG? Is> LNG for motor vehicles priced/taxed the same as LNG for heating? I am> asking because I am sure I recall that, about 20 years or more ago in> Australia, as LNG became more popular as a motor-vehicle fuel (e.g., I> recall that most taxis and many other commercial fleets in Brisbane were> using LNG), so the taxes on it were increased? Couldn't the same thing> happen elsewhere, thus tending to wipe out the cost advantage?

I think you mean LPG (liquefied petroleum gas--mostly propane), not LNG.
Liquefied natural gas would not be feasible in an auto due to the exotic
temperatures it would require. Some buses and institutional vehicles run on
compressed natural gas, although it contains less energy per volume of a
typical cylinder then LPG. I assume CNG is cheaper then LPG.

Engines can be run quite happily on natural gas, and it burns much cleaner
than gasoline as well.

Add comment
Dori A Schmetterling 29 April 2005 20:25:01 permanent link ]
 In part-reply also to heydave, this is all well and good but has little to
do with the final price of the fuel at the pump in most parts of the globe.
I.e. a discussion about crude prices is fine if you're into oil trading but
of little interest to the average motorist.

The biggest single cost factor by far in most countries is the government.
At 80 to 95 pence per litre in the UK and EUR 1.05 for standard 95 octane
unleaded (approx 91 US) over much of developed Europe I couldn't give a toss
whether crude costs 20 dollars or 50 dollars a barrel.

(Of course it matters for heating and other uses of oil and gas where taxes
are much lower.)

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Joe" <Joe@dontspam.net> wrote in message
news:XOjce.26281$Ow­2.24821@fe06.lga...
[...]>
Here's the long version: There is a cost associated with pumping up a > barrel of oil, but the price of oil has very little to do with that cost. > The price of oil is set only by supply and demand. That's because OPEC > wants it that way. They control the price of oil as well as they can.
[...]


Add comment
MoPar Man 30 April 2005 06:17:36 permanent link ]
 Joe wrote:
Oil comes out of a hole in the ground, and whoever owns the hole> is keeping the money. They get paid by the barrel.

Don't state/provincial/fe­deral govt's get any cut of that oil money?

Don't oil companies own rights to drill for oil, but the oil is still
essentially owned by the gov't?

Alberta has no provincial sales tax and their health care is funded
pretty substancially some how by oil money. They have endowments for
hospitals and medical research that are really substantial. I wonder
if Texas has anything equivalent.
... OPEC wants it that way. They control the price of oil as> well as they can.

Technically, don't they control the _supply_ of oil (from OPEC
countries) and hope that their control over supply has the desired
result as far as what a barrel costs on the open market?
Remember price doesn't have anything to do with cost.

Technically, if the supply of something is at least equal to 100% of
the demand (or maybe 105% of demand), then the price for that
something should not be exorbatant. But when the price for that
something is twice what it was a year or two ago, then you'd think
that the supply now is maybe only 99% of demand.

Or, put it another way, given that oil is twice the price of what it
was 2 years ago, you'd think that some sort of rationing has happened
such that somebody that wanted oil wasn't able to actually obtain it
(which would happen if supply couldn't keep up with demand) and hence
the price for the item in question (oil) is 2x what it was a short
time ago.

Now if no such rationing has actually happened (ie if everyone that
wanted a barrel of oil was actually able to obtain it) then we can say
that supply has (always and consistently) met demand. If so, there is
no logical reason why oil has doubled in price. The markets may be
transiently irrational, but never for such a long stretch of time.

Explain this:

If there is a shortage of gasoline (perceived or real), and if said
shortage is blamed on lack of refining capacity, and if the wholesale
price of gasoline goes up because of this, then why should that also
drive up the price of crude oil? The Saudi's have repeatedly said
that they can supply the US with all the crude oil it needs, but it's
the lack of refining capacity (primarily) that makes gasoline prices
go up. So technically there is a "glut" of oil in storage (which the
markets recently discovered which resulted in a drop in oil below $50)
but still there seems to be a disconnect between the price of crude
and the price of gasoline. Gasoline may be in short supply (and
therefore expensive) but the price of oil shouldn't also rise because
of that (techincally it should fall).

Is anyone tracking the compensation packages of oil company executives
during this run-up of oil prices? What about dividend payments?
Just what is happening to the price of oil company stocks? You'd
think they'd be going through the roof, like Google (Did you hear Matt
Drudge last Sunday night? He couldn't believe that Google is worth
$60 billion. More than ViaCom. More than GM. He's right - Google's
share price will burst. I have no idea how they make money. Their
search portal looks is incredibly devoid of advertizing in my
experience).
Add comment
Dori A Schmetterling 2 May 2005 16:04:46 permanent link ]
 The US is not the only consumer of oil. In most parts of the developed
world there is, indeed, little connection between the price of crude and
petrol at the pump.

In fact, we have had situations certainly in the UK where, when there has
been a reduction in petrol prices by a few pence per gallon (because of some
big drop in crude prices), the government has taken the opportunity to raise
taxes further.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"MoPar Man" <MoPar@Man.com> wrote in message
news:4272EAC0.8BE58­503@Man.com...
[...]> but still there seems to be a disconnect between the price of crude> and the price of gasoline. Gasoline may be in short supply (and> therefore expensive) but the price of oil shouldn't also rise because> of that (techincally it should fall).
[...]


Add comment
MoPar Man 2 May 2005 17:03:36 permanent link ]
 Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
In fact, we have had situations certainly in the UK where, when> there has been a reduction in petrol prices by a few pence per > gallon (because of some big drop in crude prices), the government> has taken the opportunity to raise taxes further.

You're about to have an election (where god knows why you're about to
put Tony Bliar back in power) and you're telling me the gov't has the
balls to _raise_ taxes on petrol just before an election?

Much of this thread has focused on the differences in the cost of
petrol/gasoline caused by taxes added at the pump which clearly has
nothing to do with the wholesale cost of the refined product or
regional differences of said refined product caused by regional
differences in refining capacity.

If market collusion continues in the US where refining capacity can
bearly keep up with demand then the wholesale price of gasoline should
(in theory) rise on merchantile markets in North America compared with
similar markets in Europe (unless refiners in Europe are doing the
same).

In general I think there is a conspiracy in North America when it
comes to energy (gasoline and electricity specifically) when it comes
to taking capacity off-line to force prices higher. Some of Ontario's
nuclear power plants are not on-line for some reason, and I think it's
part of a plan to reduce excess capacity on the eastern-north-ameri­can
grid to cause wholesale electricity prices higher this summer.
Add comment
David 2 May 2005 19:41:08 permanent link ]
 
"MoPar Man" <MoPar@Man.com> wrote in message
news:42762528.3F00D­731@Man.com...> Dori A Schmetterling wrote:>
In fact, we have had situations certainly in the UK where, when>> there has been a reduction in petrol prices by a few pence per>> gallon (because of some big drop in crude prices), the government>> has taken the opportunity to raise taxes further.>
You're about to have an election (where god knows why you're about to> put Tony Bliar back in power) and you're telling me the gov't has the> balls to _raise_ taxes on petrol just before an election?>
Much of this thread has focused on the differences in the cost of> petrol/gasoline caused by taxes added at the pump which clearly has> nothing to do with the wholesale cost of the refined product or> regional differences of said refined product caused by regional> differences in refining capacity.>
If market collusion continues in the US where refining capacity can> bearly keep up with demand then the wholesale price of gasoline should> (in theory) rise on merchantile markets in North America compared with> similar markets in Europe (unless refiners in Europe are doing the> same).>
In general I think there is a conspiracy in North America when it> comes to energy (gasoline and electricity specifically) when it comes> to taking capacity off-line to force prices higher. Some of Ontario's> nuclear power plants are not on-line for some reason, and I think it's> part of a plan to reduce excess capacity on the eastern-north-ameri­can> grid to cause wholesale electricity prices higher this summer.
Actually, it is because they are undergoing significant upgrading to reduce
risk of failures. Most nuclear reactors in canada are over 30 years old. And
with the candu's in foreign countries showing signs of failure, they want to
make sure they are upgraded in Canada.


Add comment
MoPar Man 3 May 2005 07:20:16 permanent link ]
 David wrote:
Some of Ontario's nuclear power plants are not on-line for some> > reason, >
Actually, it is because they are undergoing significant upgrading

Which has already been done (and which had taken much longer to do,
and the British company that bought some of the Ontario nuclear plants
got "burned" by the lack of profits and last I heard was trying to
sell them last year. If I recall correctly, all Nuke plants were
supposed to be up and running this year. Then earlier this spring it
was announced that some were either still off-line or will be taken
off line.
Most nuclear reactors in canada are over 30 years old.

How old is the youngest nuke plant in the USA? UK?
And with the candu's in foreign countries showing signs of> failure, they want to make sure they are upgraded in Canada.

I think the candu is the only reactor that doesn't produce
weapons-grade waste material (ie plutonium?). Or, in other words, if
Iran were building Candu's then I don't think there would be any fear
of them being able to use them to refine uranium for weapons.
Add comment
Peter 3 May 2005 11:28:35 permanent link ]
 
2. One reason there is an increased interest in LNG-powered vehicles> is that fuel is cheaper. What taxes are included in the price of LNG?> Is LNG for motor vehicles priced/taxed the same as LNG for heating? I> am asking because I am sure I recall that, about 20 years or more ago> in Australia, as LNG became more popular as a motor-vehicle fuel> (e.g., I recall that most taxis and many other commercial fleets in> Brisbane were using LNG), so the taxes on it were increased? Couldn't> the same thing happen elsewhere, thus tending to wipe out the cost> advantage?

I think you mean LPG - Liquified Propane Gas. Yes, in Europe taxes are lower
on LPG to the point where it becomes ~2x cheaper than gasoline. As others
have pointed out that situation can change, and apparently LPG prices are
bound to go up in future. LPG is also widely used for heating purposes... if
all else fails I'll get myself a nice house heating system and fill up my
car from it ;)

Alternatively there's CNG - Compressed Natural Gas (methane), which can be
produced from organic sources as well. It's not as popular as LPG due to
various reasons, but is much cheaper and supplies are abundant...

Peter


Add comment
Bill Putney 3 May 2005 13:57:38 permanent link ]
 Peter wrote:> ...in Europe taxes are lower > on LPG to the point where it becomes ~2x cheaper than gasoline...

What does the phrase "2x cheaper" mean? Statements like that must drive
mathematicians nuts.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Add comment
Peter 3 May 2005 15:19:11 permanent link ]
 
...in Europe taxes are lower>> on LPG to the point where it becomes ~2x cheaper than gasoline...>
What does the phrase "2x cheaper" mean? Statements like that must> drive mathematicians nuts.

Well, I'm a mathematician by education ;)

What I meant was that for any given unit of measurement (where unit is less
than 1000 liters) the following statement is true:

(cost to purchase LPG) = (cost to purchase regular gas) / 2

Is it clear now? ;)))

In practical terms I pay ~1.8$/gal for LPG, and ~3.5$/gal for gasoline. CNG
is cheaper still, not sure how they meter it since it's in gaseous form but
I've heard your cost per mile is about the same as if you were buying
gasoline at ~0.7$/gal

Peter


Add comment
Dori A Schmetterling 3 May 2005 19:50:18 permanent link ]
 This reminds me of a story told by my mother about the time she was a
student (many years ago....violin strings please....).

The lecturer/professor lectured the class about the misuse of the word
"half" and then concluded the harangue with the admonition that the "greater
half" of the class had not been listening....

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Bill Putney" <bptn@kinez.net> wrote in message
news:d57huh$ols$1@n­ews.isdn.net...
[...]>
What does the phrase "2x cheaper" mean? Statements like that must drive > mathematicians nuts.>
Bill Putney> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my > adddress with the letter 'x')


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Chrysler > Gas prices and alternative fuels -- two questions 3 May 2005 19:50:18

see also:
Re: Sharing that "moving sucks" feeling…
pass tests:
see also:
...1996 blazer
car door removal
2001 Pontiac Body control module…

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .