What blogs can I read?
Symptoms of a failing tranny?
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Chrysler > Symptoms of a failing tranny? 19 April 2005 14:39:44

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Symptoms of a failing tranny?

SBlackfoot 16 April 2005 03:41:03
 '93 Grand Voyager, 3.0L, 3 speed auto (Dad used to say it was the four speed
O/D, but it doesn't have O/D on the shifter, cruising at 100kph is at around
3k revs, and I only feel three shifts so...). I know some trannies in these
vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the dot, I'm sitting at 178k and
getting worried. The 1-2 shift has always been rough since new, now over the
past six months or so the 2-1 downshift has been grabbing. Do I have
problems on the horizon? I'm planning on dropping the pan and changing the
fluid and filter the next chance I get. I just haven't heard of an auto
grabbing on it's way out before.


Add comment
Nospam Clare Nce 16 April 2005 05:28:39 permanent link ]
 On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:41:03 -0400, "SBlackfoot"
<trypticon@sympatic­o.remove.ca> wrote:
'93 Grand Voyager, 3.0L, 3 speed auto (Dad used to say it was the four speed>O/D, but it doesn't have O/D on the shifter, cruising at 100kph is at around>3k revs, and I only feel three shifts so...). I know some trannies in these>vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the dot, I'm sitting at 178k and>getting worried. The 1-2 shift has always been rough since new, now over the>past six months or so the 2-1 downshift has been grabbing. Do I have>problems on the horizon? I'm planning on dropping the pan and changing the>fluid and filter the next chance I get. I just haven't heard of an auto>grabbing on it's way out before.>
The 3 speed is pretty reliable, at least compared to the 4 speed. Old
fluid can make them shift pretty rough - changing the fluid may well
get rid of the problem.
Add comment
Treeline 16 April 2005 11:20:18 permanent link ]
 <nospam.clare.nce@sn­y.der.on.ca> wrote in message
news:agq061h6bm1a9o­edto1ithnenkmltho6ih­@4ax.com...> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:41:03 -0400, "SBlackfoot"> <trypticon@sympatic­o.remove.ca> wrote:>
'93 Grand Voyager, 3.0L, 3 speed auto (Dad used to say it was the four speed> >O/D, but it doesn't have O/D on the shifter, cruising at 100kph is at around> >3k revs, and I only feel three shifts so...). I know some trannies in these> >vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the dot, I'm sitting at 178k and> >getting worried. The 1-2 shift has always been rough since new, now over the> >past six months or so the 2-1 downshift has been grabbing. Do I have> >problems on the horizon? I'm planning on dropping the pan and changing the> >fluid and filter the next chance I get. I just haven't heard of an auto> >grabbing on it's way out before.> >
The 3 speed is pretty reliable, at least compared to the 4 speed. Old> fluid can make them shift pretty rough - changing the fluid may well> get rid of the problem.

The O/D is not on the shifter. It's a switch to the right because it's
electronic, that is, an electronic transmission, controlled by a TCM or
Transmission Control Module, and not a selectable gear. The TCM is a computer
which can have its firmware upgraded by the dealer. It's easy to miss the
switch. Took me a long time and I also erroneously thought I did not have a
4-speed O/D tranny.

You might want to consider checking to make sure you have the latest firmware
if, I repeat, if this is the case with you. In other threads, in the last few
weeks, I spelled out the modules and the firmware versions.

Are you thinking the shifter will say 1 2 D O/D or something like that? It does
not. I made that mistake too. The VIN might sort this out for you. Don't know.

In my case, the firmware solved the very uncomfortable shudder of the
transmission beginning to self-destruct because the clutch was engaging too
slowly the torque converter. A software mistake with the early transmissions
that was found and first corrected around 1995 or so in the tech reports.

I had the pan dropped, the filter replaced with OEM, and used ATF+3 and all the
previous problems immediately went away. To upgrade the computer is relatively
inexpensive. In fact, the whole thing at a super good dealer was around $130
USD. But be careful. Another dealer could easily charge double and maybe not do
such a hot job. Ask around. In my area, I could not find a non-dealer mechanic
who really knew or wanted to be bothered by all this which requires special
cables and the equipment to flash the EEPROM in the TCM in the pre-1995
Voyagers. And my local dealer was a bit of a jerk so I found a distant dealer
who was great, from cartalk.com. Heh, what's a guy going to do when he can't
get a straight answer?

Oh, when the car goes into O/D, the engine actually slows down as I just
discussed tonight, as a matter of fact. Paradoxically, the highest gear does
not need a very fast engine since it's directly coupled. That's why Over-Drive
works so well in efficiency. Now am I right or do I have to go into hiding?

And I also only feel three shifts. But a fellow I was discussing this with who
used to fly airplanes, so is careful about engines obviously, and be an
electronics repairman said that the fourth shift is when the engine slows down.
So it's not obvious and even counter-intuitive. In fact, it's the obvious of
what you might expect going into fourth gear.

How am I doing? On target or not even in the universe?








Add comment
Pottsy 16 April 2005 13:44:10 permanent link ]
 hiya,

I had the rough downshift on my Granada (UK) when the donkey was sick and
the idle speed was too low, raised the idle speed and the downshift was
lovely again.

m



Add comment
Jdoe 16 April 2005 15:30:59 permanent link ]
 He won't have the switch even if it's a 4 spd. I believe it may be as he
says feels 3 shifts 1-2 = 1 2-3 =2 3-4 = 3. If it was a 3spd it would only
be 2 shifts.
Larry
"Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com> wrote in message
news:S038e.23706$1p­4.13558@trndny06...>­ <nospam.clare.nce@s­ny.der.on.ca> wrote in message> news:agq061h6bm1a9o­edto1ithnenkmltho6ih­@4ax.com...>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:41:03 -0400, "SBlackfoot">> <trypticon@sympatic­o.remove.ca> wrote:>>
'93 Grand Voyager, 3.0L, 3 speed auto (Dad used to say it was the four >> >speed>> >O/D, but it doesn't have O/D on the shifter, cruising at 100kph is at >> >around>> >3k revs, and I only feel three shifts so...). I know some trannies in >> >these>> >vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the dot, I'm sitting at 178k and>> >getting worried. The 1-2 shift has always been rough since new, now over >> >the>> >past six months or so the 2-1 downshift has been grabbing. Do I have>> >problems on the horizon? I'm planning on dropping the pan and changing >> >the>> >fluid and filter the next chance I get. I just haven't heard of an auto>> >grabbing on it's way out before.>> >
The 3 speed is pretty reliable, at least compared to the 4 speed. Old>> fluid can make them shift pretty rough - changing the fluid may well>> get rid of the problem.>
The O/D is not on the shifter. It's a switch to the right because it's> electronic, that is, an electronic transmission, controlled by a TCM or> Transmission Control Module, and not a selectable gear. The TCM is a > computer> which can have its firmware upgraded by the dealer. It's easy to miss the> switch. Took me a long time and I also erroneously thought I did not have > a> 4-speed O/D tranny.>
You might want to consider checking to make sure you have the latest > firmware> if, I repeat, if this is the case with you. In other threads, in the last > few> weeks, I spelled out the modules and the firmware versions.>
Are you thinking the shifter will say 1 2 D O/D or something like that? It > does> not. I made that mistake too. The VIN might sort this out for you. Don't > know.>
In my case, the firmware solved the very uncomfortable shudder of the> transmission beginning to self-destruct because the clutch was engaging > too> slowly the torque converter. A software mistake with the early > transmissions> that was found and first corrected around 1995 or so in the tech reports.>
I had the pan dropped, the filter replaced with OEM, and used ATF+3 and > all the> previous problems immediately went away. To upgrade the computer is > relatively> inexpensive. In fact, the whole thing at a super good dealer was around > $130> USD. But be careful. Another dealer could easily charge double and maybe > not do> such a hot job. Ask around. In my area, I could not find a non-dealer > mechanic> who really knew or wanted to be bothered by all this which requires > special> cables and the equipment to flash the EEPROM in the TCM in the pre-1995> Voyagers. And my local dealer was a bit of a jerk so I found a distant > dealer> who was great, from cartalk.com. Heh, what's a guy going to do when he > can't> get a straight answer?>
Oh, when the car goes into O/D, the engine actually slows down as I just> discussed tonight, as a matter of fact. Paradoxically, the highest gear > does> not need a very fast engine since it's directly coupled. That's why > Over-Drive> works so well in efficiency. Now am I right or do I have to go into > hiding?>
And I also only feel three shifts. But a fellow I was discussing this with > who> used to fly airplanes, so is careful about engines obviously, and be an> electronics repairman said that the fourth shift is when the engine slows > down.> So it's not obvious and even counter-intuitive. In fact, it's the obvious > of> what you might expect going into fourth gear.>
How am I doing? On target or not even in the universe?>


Add comment
Bill Putney 16 April 2005 15:43:50 permanent link ]
 Treeline wrote:

...And I also only feel three shifts. But a fellow I was discussing this with who> used to fly airplanes, so is careful about engines obviously, and be an> electronics repairman said that the fourth shift is when the engine slows down.> So it's not obvious and even counter-intuitive. In fact, it's the obvious of> what you might expect going into fourth gear.>
How am I doing? On target or not even in the universe?

So you'd see it on a tach but not feel it - because it isn't going to go
into O/D under an acceleration condition. It's like that on my Concorde
(that has a tach).

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 16 April 2005 18:11:09 permanent link ]
 On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, SBlackfoot wrote:
'93 Grand Voyager, 3.0L, 3 speed auto (Dad used to say it was the four> speed O/D, but it doesn't have O/D on the shifter, cruising at 100kph is> at around 3k revs, and I only feel three shifts so...).

The 4-speed auto shift quadrant says "P R N D 3 L".
The 3-speed auto shift quadrant says "P R N D 2 1".

Using that ID guide, which transmission is it?

The "3 shifts" you feel could either be 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, or could be 1-2,
2-3, and the torque converter locking up in 3.
I know some trannies in these vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the> dot,

This "knowledge" is not correct.
The 1-2 shift has always been rough since new

Not normal.
now over the past six months or so the 2-1 downshift has been grabbing.

Define "grabbing".
Do I have problems on the horizon?

How often have the fluid and filter been changed and, if it's the 3-speed,
the bands been adjusted and the linkage adjustment checked?

Add comment
SBlackfoot 16 April 2005 19:31:01 permanent link ]
 
He won't have the switch even if it's a 4 spd. I believe it may be as he> says feels 3 shifts 1-2 = 1 2-3 =2 3-4 = 3. If it was a 3spd it would only> be 2 shifts.> Larry

Crap sorry, I meant two shifts. I'll make sure today. :o)


Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 16 April 2005 20:09:20 permanent link ]
 On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, SBlackfoot wrote:
I know some trannies in these vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the> > > dot,> >
This "knowledge" is not correct.>
I've heard it several times from several sources....

Lots of people heard "The earth is flat" from lots of sources lots of
times.
Grabbing. Upon deceleration (foot off the gas, on the brake) when the> tranny downshifts to first the tranny grabs, the revs drop a few hundred> rmp, the vehicle lurches forward a bit due to the engine acting as a> brake in this case. Grabbing.

Sounds like a kickdown cable and band adjustment issue.
How often have the fluid and filter been changed and, if it's the> > 3-speed, the bands been adjusted and the linkage adjustment checked?
To be honest, not very often.

Do so now.

DS
Add comment
SBlackfoot 17 April 2005 03:53:41 permanent link ]
 Alright. Definitely two shifts, first at 40kph, and second at around 75kph.
"D 1 2" on the indicator. 100kph at around 2800 rpm. All signs point to a
three speed.


Add comment
SBlackfoot 17 April 2005 03:56:23 permanent link ]
 
I know some trannies in these vans is known to drop at 180k kms on
dot,> > >
This "knowledge" is not correct.> >
I've heard it several times from several sources....>
Lots of people heard "The earth is flat" from lots of sources lots of> times.

Until proven otherwise. ;) Right or wrong, it's still a well documented
issue (or non-issue, as the case may very well be).

Grabbing. Upon deceleration (foot off the gas, on the brake) when the> > tranny downshifts to first the tranny grabs, the revs drop a few hundred> > rmp, the vehicle lurches forward a bit due to the engine acting as a> > brake in this case. Grabbing.>
Sounds like a kickdown cable and band adjustment issue.

I'll adjust the bands while I do the fluid/filter, tomorrow with any luck.

How often have the fluid and filter been changed and, if it's the> > > 3-speed, the bands been adjusted and the linkage adjustment checked?>
To be honest, not very often.>
Do so now.

Tomorrow will have to do. ;)


Add comment
Treeline 17 April 2005 05:38:41 permanent link ]
 "Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1>­ wrote in message
news:P­ine.GSO.4.58.­0504161008410.22033@­alumni.engin.umich.e­du...
The 4-speed auto shift quadrant says "P R N D 3 L".

Does this mean that "D" represents exactly what?
The full spectrum, whatever that might be, from 1 to 4?
Or from 1 to 3 and Overdrive then which is the torque converter lockup?

And the "3" is used for what used to be the "2" - for
icy conditions as the start gear? Or is L really 1 and maybe 2?
The 3-speed auto shift quadrant says "P R N D 2 1".
The "3 shifts" you feel could either be 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, or could be 1-2,> 2-3, and the torque converter locking up in 3.

If it's "4" then the torque converter may or may not be locking up?
"4" is not automatically Overdrive? It's possible to have Overdrive
in either of the two configurations above? So if it were a 4 speed
plus Overdrive, is that then really a "5-speed" ???

I don't have an owner's manual and the factory shop manual won't arrive
for another week for a Voyager 3.0 L with the 41TE/A604 tranny.

Heh, thanks to the give and take on the group, I did find a shop
manual for $20 plus shipping or $25. I guess selling a manual
when people needed to get their taxes done is not a great time
for the seller, but good for the buyer. Generally the manuals sold
for twice this but this one looked a bit worn on the cover though.
But as long as it's readable.





Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 17 April 2005 05:54:05 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Treeline wrote:
The 4-speed auto shift quadrant says "P R N D 3 L".>
Does this mean that "D" represents exactly what?> The full spectrum, whatever that might be, from 1 to 4?

Yes. 1-2-3-4, with torque converter lockup in 2, 3 and 4.
Or from 1 to 3 and Overdrive then which is the torque converter lockup?

Overdrive is not the same as TC lockup.

And the "3" is used for what used to be the "2"

No, 3 is used to prevent the trans from shifting into 4th (overdrive), and
it also raises the 1-2 and 2-3 shift points and the road speed at which
TC lockup occurs.
Or is L really 1 and maybe 2?

L dramatically raises the 1-2 shift point, and even more dramatically
raises the 2-3 shift point, and prevents TC lockup in 2.
"4" is not automatically Overdrive?

4th is an overdrive gear. Do you understand what that means?
So if it were a 4 speed plus Overdrive, is that then really a "5-speed"> ???

It is not a "4 speed plus overdrive".

DS
Add comment
Treeline 17 April 2005 07:15:13 permanent link ]
 "Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1>­ wrote in message
news:P­ine.GSO.4.58.­0504162149260.4810@a­lumni.engin.umich.ed­u...

And the "3" is used for what used to be the "2">
No, 3 is used to prevent the trans from shifting into 4th (overdrive), and> it also raises the 1-2 and 2-3 shift points and the road speed at which> TC lockup occurs.

So it's not possible to start the car in second gear as it used to be with
"2" presumably for snowy or ice conditions where less torque was
preferable. I rarely used "2" and it did not seem too different from just
going a little more slowly in "D." So they just dropped the snow/ice gear?
Or is it "3" since it raises the shift points?

4th is an overdrive gear. Do you understand what that means?

Let's see if I can remember this stuff again.
4th appears to spin the drive wheels rather fast compared to engine speed,
hence the name, overdrive. I get this confused with torque converter which
is locking the tranny to the drive wheels in whatever gear is being used
except for first gear? A torque converter lockup in 4th gear would produce
the highest gear drive wheel ratio compared to engine speed?

And 3rd gear should stop before 4th but I don't know the specifications,
without a manual. Maybe 3rd is good until 70 mph and 4th goes
as fast as the engine or vehicle can tolerate. Or possibly 3rd is good
to go to even 90 mph. Just guessing.

Probably looking at the actual gear ratios would make this all a bit
clearer. When I get ahold of a shop manual, I'll look it up for the
A604/41TE for the 1994 Voyager 3.0 L.
DS

Add comment
Nospam Clare Nce 17 April 2005 08:32:35 permanent link ]
 On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 07:20:18 GMT, "Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com>
wrote:
<nospam.clare.nce@­sny.der.on.ca> wrote in message>news:agq061­h6bm1a9oedto1ithnenk­mltho6ih@4ax.com...>­> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:41:03 -0400, "SBlackfoot">> <trypticon@sympatic­o.remove.ca> wrote:>>
'93 Grand Voyager, 3.0L, 3 speed auto (Dad used to say it was the four speed>> >O/D, but it doesn't have O/D on the shifter, cruising at 100kph is at around>> >3k revs, and I only feel three shifts so...). I know some trannies in these>> >vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the dot, I'm sitting at 178k and>> >getting worried. The 1-2 shift has always been rough since new, now over the>> >past six months or so the 2-1 downshift has been grabbing. Do I have>> >problems on the horizon? I'm planning on dropping the pan and changing the>> >fluid and filter the next chance I get. I just haven't heard of an auto>> >grabbing on it's way out before.>> >
The 3 speed is pretty reliable, at least compared to the 4 speed. Old>> fluid can make them shift pretty rough - changing the fluid may well>> get rid of the problem.>
The O/D is not on the shifter. It's a switch to the right because it's>electronic, that is, an electronic transmission, controlled by a TCM or>Transmission Control Module, and not a selectable gear. The TCM is a computer>which can have its firmware upgraded by the dealer. It's easy to miss the>switch. Took me a long time and I also erroneously thought I did not have a>4-speed O/D tranny.>
MOST back then had the OD on the shift quadrant. Pre OBD2 most
firmware was not upgradeable.

You might want to consider checking to make sure you have the latest firmware>if, I repeat, if this is the case with you. In other threads, in the last few>weeks, I spelled out the modules and the firmware versions.>
Are you thinking the shifter will say 1 2 D O/D or something like that? It does>not. I made that mistake too. The VIN might sort this out for you. Don't know.>
In my case, the firmware solved the very uncomfortable shudder of the>transmission beginning to self-destruct because the clutch was engaging too>slowly the torque converter. A software mistake with the early transmissions>that was found and first corrected around 1995 or so in the tech reports.>
I had the pan dropped, the filter replaced with OEM, and used ATF+3 and all the>previous problems immediately went away. To upgrade the computer is relatively>inexpens­ive. In fact, the whole thing at a super good dealer was around $130>USD. But be careful. Another dealer could easily charge double and maybe not do>such a hot job. Ask around. In my area, I could not find a non-dealer mechanic>who really knew or wanted to be bothered by all this which requires special>cables and the equipment to flash the EEPROM in the TCM in the pre-1995>Voyagers. And my local dealer was a bit of a jerk so I found a distant dealer>who was great, from cartalk.com. Heh, what's a guy going to do when he can't>get a straight answer?>
Oh, when the car goes into O/D, the engine actually slows down as I just>discussed tonight, as a matter of fact. Paradoxically, the highest gear does>not need a very fast engine since it's directly coupled. That's why Over-Drive>works so well in efficiency. Now am I right or do I have to go into hiding?>
And I also only feel three shifts. But a fellow I was discussing this with who>used to fly airplanes, so is careful about engines obviously, and be an>electronics repairman said that the fourth shift is when the engine slows down.>So it's not obvious and even counter-intuitive. In fact, it's the obvious of>what you might expect going into fourth gear.

$ gears IS 3 shifts. You start in 1st - it shifts to second (shift 1)
third)shift 2) and overdrive (shift 3)
In between the TC also locks in both third and overdrive - so you can
feel 5 shifts if you reallu concentrate.>
How am I doing? On target or not even in the universe?>

Add comment
Nospam Clare Nce 17 April 2005 08:33:20 permanent link ]
 On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:30:59 GMT, "jdoe" <jdoe@msn.com> wrote:
He won't have the switch even if it's a 4 spd. I believe it may be as he >says feels 3 shifts 1-2 = 1 2-3 =2 3-4 = 3. If it was a 3spd it would only >be 2 shifts.

Don't forget the TC lockup.
Larry>"Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com> wrote in message >news:S038e.23706$1­p4.13558@trndny06...­>> <nospam.clare.nce@s­ny.der.on.ca> wrote in message>> news:agq061h6bm1a9o­edto1ithnenkmltho6ih­@4ax.com...>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:41:03 -0400, "SBlackfoot">>> <trypticon@sympatic­o.remove.ca> wrote:>>>
'93 Grand Voyager, 3.0L, 3 speed auto (Dad used to say it was the four >>> >speed>>> >O/D, but it doesn't have O/D on the shifter, cruising at 100kph is at >>> >around>>> >3k revs, and I only feel three shifts so...). I know some trannies in >>> >these>>> >vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the dot, I'm sitting at 178k and>>> >getting worried. The 1-2 shift has always been rough since new, now over >>> >the>>> >past six months or so the 2-1 downshift has been grabbing. Do I have>>> >problems on the horizon? I'm planning on dropping the pan and changing >>> >the>>> >fluid and filter the next chance I get. I just haven't heard of an auto>>> >grabbing on it's way out before.>>> >
The 3 speed is pretty reliable, at least compared to the 4 speed. Old>>> fluid can make them shift pretty rough - changing the fluid may well>>> get rid of the problem.>>
The O/D is not on the shifter. It's a switch to the right because it's>> electronic, that is, an electronic transmission, controlled by a TCM or>> Transmission Control Module, and not a selectable gear. The TCM is a >> computer>> which can have its firmware upgraded by the dealer. It's easy to miss the>> switch. Took me a long time and I also erroneously thought I did not have >> a>> 4-speed O/D tranny.>>
You might want to consider checking to make sure you have the latest >> firmware>> if, I repeat, if this is the case with you. In other threads, in the last >> few>> weeks, I spelled out the modules and the firmware versions.>>
Are you thinking the shifter will say 1 2 D O/D or something like that? It >> does>> not. I made that mistake too. The VIN might sort this out for you. Don't >> know.>>
In my case, the firmware solved the very uncomfortable shudder of the>> transmission beginning to self-destruct because the clutch was engaging >> too>> slowly the torque converter. A software mistake with the early >> transmissions>> that was found and first corrected around 1995 or so in the tech reports.>>
I had the pan dropped, the filter replaced with OEM, and used ATF+3 and >> all the>> previous problems immediately went away. To upgrade the computer is >> relatively>> inexpensive. In fact, the whole thing at a super good dealer was around >> $130>> USD. But be careful. Another dealer could easily charge double and maybe >> not do>> such a hot job. Ask around. In my area, I could not find a non-dealer >> mechanic>> who really knew or wanted to be bothered by all this which requires >> special>> cables and the equipment to flash the EEPROM in the TCM in the pre-1995>> Voyagers. And my local dealer was a bit of a jerk so I found a distant >> dealer>> who was great, from cartalk.com. Heh, what's a guy going to do when he >> can't>> get a straight answer?>>
Oh, when the car goes into O/D, the engine actually slows down as I just>> discussed tonight, as a matter of fact. Paradoxically, the highest gear >> does>> not need a very fast engine since it's directly coupled. That's why >> Over-Drive>> works so well in efficiency. Now am I right or do I have to go into >> hiding?>>
And I also only feel three shifts. But a fellow I was discussing this with >> who>> used to fly airplanes, so is careful about engines obviously, and be an>> electronics repairman said that the fourth shift is when the engine slows >> down.>> So it's not obvious and even counter-intuitive. In fact, it's the obvious >> of>> what you might expect going into fourth gear.>>
How am I doing? On target or not even in the universe?>>

Add comment
Treeline 17 April 2005 14:05:01 permanent link ]
 
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, "Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com> wrote:> >The O/D is not on the shifter. It's a switch to the right because it's> >electronic, that is, an electronic transmission, controlled by a TCM or> >Transmission Control Module, and not a selectable gear. The TCM is a
computer> >which can have its firmware upgraded by the dealer. It's easy to miss the> >switch. Took me a long time and I also erroneously thought I did not have a> >4-speed O/D tranny.


<nospam.clare.nce@s­ny.der.on.ca> wrote in message
news:udp361t8mq1h6e­fb6d35mfn4ut0o8nhf52­@4ax.com...
MOST back then had the OD on the shift quadrant. Pre OBD2 most> firmware was not upgradeable.


I am not sure what you mean by the above.
My gear selector says "P R N D 3 L" - where would be the OD? Is that not
embedded in the "D" which means gears 1 through 4 with 4 being OD?

There is an electronic switch, below the rear windshield wipers' switches,
which allows the O/D to be turned off. This is on a 1994.

About Pre OBD2, that depends. The rough rule of thumb is that if the TCM has
dual fins, then it has an EEPROM instead of an EPROM, hence, flash or firmware
upgradeable. The vans in my range, pre-1995, require a special harness to be
attached to the device which does the readings and the upgrades. The extra
equipment required for the upgrading is why I decided to just go to the dealer,
a big dealer, who would have all these extra, older devices and capabilities.
It's all a bit confusing but I posted a list of years and what engines and body
styles can be upgraded going way back, to 1989? It's from the TSB's. Since the
TCM is obviously electronic and EEPROMs had been around for some time before
this, it's not unusual to find a TCM and A604 tranny with a flashable TCM.

Some of the cars had EPROMs instead of EEPROMs, so I don't know what they did.
Maybe they did not need any firmware upgrades. If they did, they would have had
to purchase, I assume, an upgraded TCM which is relatively expensive compared
to flashing the EEPROM.



Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 17 April 2005 19:02:28 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Treeline wrote:
And the "3" is used for what used to be the "2"> >
No, 3 is used to prevent the trans from shifting into 4th (overdrive), and> > it also raises the 1-2 and 2-3 shift points and the road speed at which> > TC lockup occurs.>
So it's not possible to start the car in second gear as it used to be with> "2"

It has never been possible to start the car in 2nd gear on an
automatic Chrysler product. Some Fords over the years offered this
ability.
So they just dropped the snow/ice gear? Or is it "3" since it raises the> shift points?

Driving in slippery conditions is best accomplished in the highest
possible gear.
4th is an overdrive gear. Do you understand what that means?>
Let's see if I can remember this stuff again.> 4th appears to spin the drive wheels rather fast compared to engine speed,> hence the name, overdrive.

Right. Underdrive means the engine is turning faster than the
transmission output shaft. Direct drive means the engine is turning at the
same speed as the trans output shaft. Overdrive means the engine is
turning slower than the trans output shaft. NOTE this does not account for
the final drive, which on a RWD vehicle is external to the transmission
(in the rear axle) but which on a FWD vehicle is internal to the
transaxle. This is always an underdrive ratio, in that the input shaft
(which is the transmission's output shaft) turns faster than the output
shaft (i.e., the wheels).
I get this confused with torque converter which is locking the tranny to> the drive wheels

No, when the TC locks it creates a direct connection between the engine
and the transmission input shaft, to eliminate the slippage that is
present with an unlocked TC, that's all.
in whatever gear is being used except for first gear?

That's unique to the electronic 4-speed and certain other electronic
transmissions. Most ordinary automatics lock the TC only in the top gear
(whatever that might be, 3rd or 4th) and only above a certain road speed.
A torque converter lockup in 4th gear would produce the highest gear> drive wheel ratio compared to engine speed?

Correct.

DS
Add comment
Bob Shuman 17 April 2005 20:49:16 permanent link ]
 
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1>­ wrote in message
news:P­ine.GSO.4.58.­0504171057550.16000@­alumni.engin.umich.e­du...> It has never been possible to start the car in 2nd gear on an> automatic Chrysler product. Some Fords over the years offered this> ability.

Actually the Chrysler "Autostick" 4 speed transmission allows you to start
in second and is a very nice feature for snow/ice conditions when coupled
with the 3.5L since the accelerator tip in made it difficult to not spin the
wheels in slippery conditions.

Bob




Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 17 April 2005 21:24:57 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Bob Shuman wrote:
It has never been possible to start the car in 2nd gear on an> > automatic Chrysler product. Some Fords over the years offered this> > ability.>
Actually the Chrysler "Autostick" 4 speed transmission

Right. I tend not to pay much attention to "manu-matic" shifters, so I
forgot to mention it.
Add comment
Nospam Clare Nce 17 April 2005 23:41:02 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 10:05:01 GMT, "Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, "Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com> wrote:>> >The O/D is not on the shifter. It's a switch to the right because it's>> >electronic, that is, an electronic transmission, controlled by a TCM or>> >Transmission Control Module, and not a selectable gear. The TCM is a>computer>> >which can have its firmware upgraded by the dealer. It's easy to miss the>> >switch. Took me a long time and I also erroneously thought I did not have a>> >4-speed O/D tranny.>
<nospam.clare.nce@­sny.der.on.ca> wrote in message>news:udp361­t8mq1h6efb6d35mfn4ut­0o8nhf52@4ax.com...>­
MOST back then had the OD on the shift quadrant. Pre OBD2 most>> firmware was not upgradeable.>
I am not sure what you mean by the above.>My gear selector says "P R N D 3 L" - where would be the OD? Is that not>embedded in the "D" which means gears 1 through 4 with 4 being OD?

Is the D in a "box" The last 4 speed Chrysler I drove had the D in
the "box" (which is really an "O" - ) signifying OverDrive. My 3 speed
did not.>
There is an electronic switch, below the rear windshield wipers' switches,>which allows the O/D to be turned off. This is on a 1994.>
About Pre OBD2, that depends. The rough rule of thumb is that if the TCM has>dual fins, then it has an EEPROM instead of an EPROM, hence, flash or firmware>upgradeabl­e. The vans in my range, pre-1995, require a special harness to be>attached to the device which does the readings and the upgrades. The extra>equipment required for the upgrading is why I decided to just go to the dealer,>a big dealer, who would have all these extra, older devices and capabilities.>It's all a bit confusing but I posted a list of years and what engines and body>styles can be upgraded going way back, to 1989? It's from the TSB's. Since the>TCM is obviously electronic and EEPROMs had been around for some time before>this, it's not unusual to find a TCM and A604 tranny with a flashable TCM.>
Some of the cars had EPROMs instead of EEPROMs, so I don't know what they did.>Maybe they did not need any firmware upgrades. If they did, they would have had>to purchase, I assume, an upgraded TCM which is relatively expensive compared>to flashing the EEPROM.>

Add comment


Bob Shuman 18 April 2005 00:03:11 permanent link ]
 I think I could actually start in 3rd too although this was not needed most
of the time as 2nd did OK on ice. Don't remember since it has been my son's
car now the last two years.

Bob
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1>­ wrote in message
news:P­ine.GSO.4.58.­0504171324300.17841@­alumni.engin.umich.e­du...> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Bob Shuman wrote:>
It has never been possible to start the car in 2nd gear on an> > > automatic Chrysler product. Some Fords over the years offered this> > > ability.> >
Actually the Chrysler "Autostick" 4 speed transmission>
Right. I tend not to pay much attention to "manu-matic" shifters, so I> forgot to mention it.


Add comment
Treeline 18 April 2005 02:59:46 permanent link ]
 <nospam.clare.nce@sn­y.der.on.ca> wrote in message
news:upe561p6jtqua5­htt27qm13efimid21m7o­@4ax.com...

I am not sure what you mean by the above.> >My gear selector says "P R N D 3 L" - where would be the OD? Is that not> >embedded in the "D" which means gears 1 through 4 with 4 being OD?>
Is the D in a "box" The last 4 speed Chrysler I drove had the D in> the "box" (which is really an "O" - ) signifying OverDrive. My 3 speed> did not.

The D is not in a box. It's just a regular, old-fashioned, new-fashioned
kind of D. I gather in your last 4 speed you have to put the car into
D with the box? Or if you put it in D it signified all the gears, including
Overdrive?

If you can figure out what I just asked, well, good for you. I can't even
bear to re-read what I just posted.


Add comment


Bill 2 18 April 2005 04:43:32 permanent link ]
 
"SBlackfoot" <trypticon@sympatic­o.remove.ca> wrote in message
news:zCh8e.7107$MZ2­.1077668@news20.bell­global.com...>> > > > I know some trannies in these vans is known to drop at 180k kms on> the>> > > > dot,>> > >
This "knowledge" is not correct.>> >
I've heard it several times from several sources....>>
Lots of people heard "The earth is flat" from lots of sources lots of>> times.>
Until proven otherwise. ;) Right or wrong, it's still a well documented> issue (or non-issue, as the case may very well be).

For four speeds maybe, but I haven't heard it for the 3 speeds.


Add comment
SBlackfoot 18 April 2005 14:05:45 permanent link ]
 
Lots of people heard "The earth is flat" from lots of sources lots of> >> times.> >
Until proven otherwise. ;) Right or wrong, it's still a well
documented> > issue (or non-issue, as the case may very well be).>
For four speeds maybe, but I haven't heard it for the 3 speeds.

Now that's what I like to hear. ;o)


Add comment


Treeline 18 April 2005 21:24:09 permanent link ]
 "Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com> wrote in message
news:hxq8e.18407$Xm­3.1032@trndny01...
I am not sure what you mean by the above.> My gear selector says "P R N D 3 L" - where would be the OD? Is that not> embedded in the "D" which means gears 1 through 4 with 4 being OD?

My mistake. The D has an "O" around it. O for Overdrive then.


Add comment
Steve 18 April 2005 21:58:14 permanent link ]
 SBlackfoot wrote:
I know some trannies in these vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the>>>dot,>>
This "knowledge" is not correct.>
I've heard it several times from several sources....


"Several sources" told Columbus the world was flat, too.
Add comment
Steve 18 April 2005 22:03:56 permanent link ]
 Treeline wrote:
So it's not possible to start the car in second gear as it used to be with> "2" presumably for snowy or ice conditions where less torque was> preferable.

Not all automatics allowed "second gear start," for example no Chrysler
3-speeds did. Some Fords did, some GMs did, and maybe Autostick allows it.
4th is an overdrive gear. Do you understand what that means?>
Let's see if I can remember this stuff again.> 4th appears to spin the drive wheels rather fast compared to engine speed,> hence the name, overdrive.

Any gear that causes the driveshaft to rotate faster than the engine
speed is an "overdrive" gear. The Chrysler 3-speed trannies have a
maximum ratio of 1:1 in 3rd gear, and are not overdrive. Some
transmissions (Viper 6-speed) have TWO gears that are overdrive of
different ratios, with 1:1 being in 4th gear.
I get this confused with torque converter which> is locking the tranny to the drive wheels in whatever gear is being used> except for first gear?

TC lockup provides a solid mechanical connection between the engine
crankshaft and the transmiission input shaft, bypassing the normal fluid
coupling of the torque convertor.

Add comment
SBlackfoot 19 April 2005 04:03:19 permanent link ]
 
"Several sources" told Columbus the world was flat, too.

Which were still thought to be correct until proven wrong... <shrug>


Add comment
Nospam Clare Nce 19 April 2005 07:01:03 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:59:46 GMT, "Treeline" <treeline12345@yaho­o.com>
wrote:
<nospam.clare.nce@­sny.der.on.ca> wrote in message>news:upe561­p6jtqua5htt27qm13efi­mid21m7o@4ax.com...>­
I am not sure what you mean by the above.>> >My gear selector says "P R N D 3 L" - where would be the OD? Is that not>> >embedded in the "D" which means gears 1 through 4 with 4 being OD?>>
Is the D in a "box" The last 4 speed Chrysler I drove had the D in>> the "box" (which is really an "O" - ) signifying OverDrive. My 3 speed>> did not.>
The D is not in a box. It's just a regular, old-fashioned, new-fashioned>kind of D. I gather in your last 4 speed you have to put the car into>D with the box? Or if you put it in D it signified all the gears, including>Overdrive­?

Right.>
If you can figure out what I just asked, well, good for you. I can't even>bear to re-read what I just posted.>

Add comment
Nospam Clare Nce 19 April 2005 07:07:58 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:03:11 -0500, "Bob Shuman"
<reshuman@removethi­s.lucent.com> wrote:
I think I could actually start in 3rd too although this was not needed most>of the time as 2nd did OK on ice. Don't remember since it has been my son's>car now the last two years.>
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1>­ wrote in message>news:P­ine.G­SO.4.58.050417132430­0.17841@alumni.engin­.umich.edu...>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Bob Shuman wrote:>>
It has never been possible to start the car in 2nd gear on an>> > > automatic Chrysler product. Some Fords over the years offered this>> > > ability.>> >
Actually the Chrysler "Autostick" 4 speed transmission>>
Right. I tend not to pay much attention to "manu-matic" shifters, so I>> forgot to mention it.>
Ford 3 speeds had 3 positions - low (start in 1st and stay there)
second (or D2) (start in second and stay there) and Drive (fully
automatic shift) Lots of Fords also only locked the converter in top
gear(direct).
Many GM and Chrysler trannies lock in the two top gears, and some
automatics(borg Warner or Aisan Warner in older (like 1996) Toyotas,
for sure,) would lock in all but low or reverse. 1, 2, 2l, 3, 3l, 4
and 4l. You could watch the tach and see it lock and unlock with
varying load and speed.
Add comment
Bill Putney 19 April 2005 14:39:44 permanent link ]
 Steve wrote:
SBlackfoot wrote:>
I know some trannies in these vans is known to drop at 180k kms on the>>>> dot,>>>
This "knowledge" is not correct.>>
I've heard it several times from several sources....>
"Several sources" told Columbus the world was flat, too.

This is the second post in a week or so on this ng implying that the
world is not flat. Are you guys saying it's not?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Chrysler > Symptoms of a failing tranny? 19 April 2005 14:39:44

see also:
GRANDAM: Finlay Motorsports Daytona…
GRANDAM: CITGO Racing adds Carpentier…
pass tests:
see also:
HELP!!!!!!!!
Power Steering Fluid in brake system
Hello,I need some help with the tim...

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .