How to restrict who may read my blog?
trans. dipstick says use dexron III in 89 chrysler lebaron
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Chrysler > trans. dipstick says use dexron III in 89 chrysler lebaron 29 March 2005 00:39:34

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

trans. dipstick says use dexron III in 89 chrysler lebaron

Marks89lebaron 26 March 2005 06:43:44
 Just about everyone on the net claims using dexron II ATF is hazardous to a
chrysler auto. transmission. Yet right from the get-go chrysler
manufacturers claim that Dexron II is the preferred ATF type for (at least
this one) the 1989 chrysler lebaron. So its no wonder the transmission
shudders and shakes like its going to fall from the car and onto the
pavement. My question is, how much old dexron fluid is allowed to stay in
the transmission? An ounce or two? Or is there a way to get every last
drop of old fluid out?

Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 26 March 2005 08:47:50 permanent link ]
 On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, marks89lebaron wrote:
Just about everyone on the net claims using dexron II ATF is hazardous to a> chrysler auto. transmission. Yet right from the get-go chrysler> manufacturers claim that Dexron II is the preferred ATF type for (at least> this one) the 1989 chrysler lebaron.

For the 3-speed auto in '89, yes, it's fine, though the current Dexron
fluid is no longer Dexron-II. If you have the 4-speed auto, you MUST use
ATF+, and *NOT* Dexron, regardless of what is stamped on the dipstick
(which could easily have been replaced with a non-original item sometime
in the last 16 years.)

Add comment
HarryS 26 March 2005 13:59:47 permanent link ]
 http://dodgeram.info­/tsb/2004/21-004-04.­htm

http://www.allpar.c­om/fix/trans.html
--
HarryS My 2¢
"marks89lebaron" <hotinarizona1969@e­arthlink.net> wrote in message
news:63121c7ab49220­7f11594247e1fe49c1@l­ocalhost.talkaboutau­tos.com...
| Just about everyone on the net claims using dexron II ATF is hazardous to
a
| chrysler auto. transmission. Yet right from the get-go chrysler
| manufacturers claim that Dexron II is the preferred ATF type for (at least
| this one) the 1989 chrysler lebaron. So its no wonder the transmission
| shudders and shakes like its going to fall from the car and onto the
| pavement. My question is, how much old dexron fluid is allowed to stay in
| the transmission? An ounce or two? Or is there a way to get every last
| drop of old fluid out?
|


Add comment
Bill Putney 26 March 2005 18:01:55 permanent link ]
 HarryS wrote:> http://dodgeram.inf­o/tsb/2004/21-004-04­.htm>

That TSB says not to use ATF+4 in the OP's car, right?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Add comment
Bill Putney 26 March 2005 18:13:16 permanent link ]
 Bill Putney wrote:
HarryS wrote:>
That TSB says not to use ATF+4 in the OP's car, right?>
Bill Putney> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my > adddress with the letter 'x')

Oops - is my face red. The TSB is written ambiguously - the vehicles
listed in the *table* are *supposed* to have ATF+4 as refill. The
exceptions are given in a sentence - the way it is written, one could
think they meant that all vehicles in the table are *not* to use ATF+4,
but I see vehciles in that list (like LH vehicles) that definitely are
supposed to use it. Who writes those things!?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Add comment
Steve 28 March 2005 22:16:57 permanent link ]
 marks89lebaron wrote:
Just about everyone on the net claims using dexron II ATF is hazardous to a> chrysler auto. transmission.

That is simply not correct. People say that Dexron is hazardous to the
Chrysler ELECTRONIC 4-SPEED transmissions with computer-modulated lockup
torque convertors. Those didn't even appear until 1989, and then ONLY in
conjunction with the 3.3L v6 engine in selected car lines.
Yet right from the get-go chrysler> manufacturers claim that Dexron II is the preferred ATF type for (at least> this one) the 1989 chrysler lebaron.

Dexron IS just fine for an 89 Chrysler 3-speed automatic.
So its no wonder the transmission> shudders and shakes like its going to fall from the car and onto the> pavement.


You've changed everything but the CV joints, and everyone here has
pointed out that inner CV joints are the #1 candidate for the symptoms
you've described. Why don't you change them before blaming the transmission?

Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 28 March 2005 23:40:32 permanent link ]
 On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Steve wrote:
People say that Dexron is hazardous to the Chrysler ELECTRONIC 4-SPEED> transmissions with computer-modulated lockup torque convertors. Those> didn't even appear until 1989, and then ONLY in conjunction with the> 3.3L v6 engine in selected car lines.

Actually, Steve, the A604 electronic 4-speed was available with the 3.0
*and* 3.3 in '89, in *most* Chrysler Corp. vehicles with those engines.
Including minivans. Including Spirits and Acclaims. Including Dynasties
and New Yorkers.
Dexron IS just fine for an 89 Chrysler 3-speed automatic.

True.
You've changed everything but the CV joints, and everyone here has> pointed out that inner CV joints are the #1 candidate for the symptoms> you've described. Why don't you change them before blaming the> transmission?

Because he obviously didn't post here for an answer to his question. He
posted here to try and garner support for his own ignorant undiagnosis.

Add comment
Steve 29 March 2005 00:39:34 permanent link ]
 Daniel J. Stern wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Steve wrote:>
People say that Dexron is hazardous to the Chrysler ELECTRONIC 4-SPEED>>transmissi­ons with computer-modulated lockup torque convertors. Those>>didn't even appear until 1989, and then ONLY in conjunction with the>>3.3L v6 engine in selected car lines.>
Actually, Steve, the A604 electronic 4-speed was available with the 3.0> *and* 3.3 in '89, in *most* Chrysler Corp. vehicles with those engines.> Including minivans. Including Spirits and Acclaims. Including Dynasties> and New Yorkers.

My bad, then. I thought the 604 was 3.3 only, and Dynasty/NYer/Imperi­al
and minivan only for 89.
You've changed everything but the CV joints, and everyone here has>>pointed out that inner CV joints are the #1 candidate for the symptoms>>you've described. Why don't you change them before blaming the>>transmission?>­
Because he obviously didn't post here for an answer to his question. He> posted here to try and garner support for his own ignorant undiagnosis.>

Or maybe because the engine is now toast (as indicated by another
thread...) ???

:-p­


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Chrysler > trans. dipstick says use dexron III in 89 chrysler lebaron 29 March 2005 00:39:34

see also:
WSR: Estoril: Race one report
RALLY: USRC: New York halfway summary
pass tests:
{censored}
see also:
belt tensioner
peugeot 306 xrdt
XYWE XYWE XYWE XYWE XYWE XYWE XYWE ...

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .