How to leave a message for a certain user?
Consumer Reports rates minivans
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Chrysler > Consumer Reports rates minivans 19 February 2005 00:19:04

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Consumer Reports rates minivans

Art 9 February 2005 02:27:49
 Not surprisingly, Honda and Toyota were rated the tops in minivans though if
you really want those fold down seats, Consumer Reports gave Chrysler the
nod. The Chrysler did not do as well as Honda and Toyota on the drivetrain,
noise and ride. Interesting enuf, Chrysler continues to get closer on
reliability...... Honda and Toyota were only slightly more reliable (very
good versus good for Chrysler). The 2 with poor reliability were Mazda and
Nissan.... neither were recommended because of reliability problems.


Add comment
David 9 February 2005 02:40:09 permanent link ]
 
"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE­@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:F1bOd.6940$wK.­2235@newsread3.news.­atl.earthlink.net...­> Not surprisingly, Honda and Toyota were rated the tops in minivans though > if you really want those fold down seats, Consumer Reports gave Chrysler > the nod. The Chrysler did not do as well as Honda and Toyota on the > drivetrain, noise and ride. Interesting enuf, Chrysler continues to get > closer on reliability...... Honda and Toyota were only slightly more > reliable (very good versus good for Chrysler). The 2 with poor > reliability were Mazda and Nissan.... neither were recommended because of > reliability problems.

Sounds right, My neighbor has a 2004 Nissan, And the problems, with fit and
finish is absurd. The vents in the roof fell out, the seats are unravelling,
the windshield is covered in tiny little airbubbles. the door pulls came
off. Drives fine though! Nice ride and handling. Ugly though.


Add comment
Matt Whiting 9 February 2005 02:59:12 permanent link ]
 Art wrote:> Not surprisingly, Honda and Toyota were rated the tops in minivans though if > you really want those fold down seats, Consumer Reports gave Chrysler the > nod. The Chrysler did not do as well as Honda and Toyota on the drivetrain, > noise and ride. Interesting enuf, Chrysler continues to get closer on > reliability...... Honda and Toyota were only slightly more reliable (very > good versus good for Chrysler). The 2 with poor reliability were Mazda and > Nissan.... neither were recommended because of reliability problems. >

Yes, but could be like my Honda Accord. The engine was very quiet until
the cam and lifters began to fail at around 70K miles and then it got
very noisy. My Grand Voyager is a little noisier than the Honda was
when new, but it hasn't become appreciably more noisy in 162,000 miles!


Matt
Add comment
Bill the second 9 February 2005 05:25:43 permanent link ]
 
"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE­@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:F1bOd.6940$wK.­2235@newsread3.news.­atl.earthlink.net...­> Not surprisingly, Honda and Toyota were rated the tops in minivans though > if you really want those fold down seats, Consumer Reports gave Chrysler > the nod. The Chrysler did not do as well as Honda and Toyota on the > drivetrain, noise and ride. Interesting enuf, Chrysler continues to get > closer on reliability...... Honda and Toyota were only slightly more > reliable (very good versus good for Chrysler). The 2 with poor > reliability were Mazda and Nissan.... neither were recommended because of > reliability problems.

Wow, Honda with it's Transmission problems still did better?

I get a kick out of all these Jap vans being rated tops, but push come to
shove I see many more Caravans rolling off dealership lots.


Add comment
Bill Putney 9 February 2005 05:28:35 permanent link ]
 Matt Whiting wrote:>
Yes, but could be like my Honda Accord. The engine was very quiet until > the cam and lifters began to fail at around 70K miles and then it got > very noisy. My Grand Voyager is a little noisier than the Honda was > when new, but it hasn't become appreciably more noisy in 162,000 miles!

So what'd they do - use the old GM technique of nitriding the cams?
Works great until the super-hard but micro-thin nitride layer wears thru
(at around 70 to 110k miles), then wears like butter.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Add comment
Matt Whiting 10 February 2005 03:06:37 permanent link ]
 Bill Putney wrote:> Matt Whiting wrote:>
Yes, but could be like my Honda Accord. The engine was very quiet >> until the cam and lifters began to fail at around 70K miles and then >> it got very noisy. My Grand Voyager is a little noisier than the >> Honda was when new, but it hasn't become appreciably more noisy in >> 162,000 miles!>
So what'd they do - use the old GM technique of nitriding the cams? > Works great until the super-hard but micro-thin nitride layer wears thru > (at around 70 to 110k miles), then wears like butter.

I have no idea what the underlying problem was, I just know that the
pads on the rocker arms and the cam lobs each had at least 1/16" of
metal worn away and were terribly spalled. All 16 were worn aobut
equally. Shortly after the car was repaired I traded it for an 89
Acclaim. Best deal I ever made!


Matt
Add comment
James C. Reeves 10 February 2005 19:44:42 permanent link ]
 The wife's 2003 Dodge Stratus is pretty bad too...one can hardly see the red
turn signal when the brake lights are also lit. Now my 2004 Sebring
(basically the same car) has amber rear signals...it makes all the
difference in the world! Those you *can* see very clearly regardless if the
brake lights are lit or not.


Add comment
Steve 10 February 2005 22:30:34 permanent link ]
 Art wrote:
Not surprisingly, Honda and Toyota were rated the tops in minivans though if > you really want those fold down seats, Consumer Reports gave Chrysler the > nod. The Chrysler did not do as well as Honda and Toyota on the drivetrain, > noise and ride.

CR are idiots. Always have been, show no signs of changing.
Add comment
Steve 10 February 2005 22:47:01 permanent link ]
 Daniel J. Stern wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, James C. Reeves wrote:>
The wife's 2003 Dodge Stratus is pretty bad too...one can hardly see the>>red turn signal when the brake lights are also lit. Now my 2004 Sebring>>(basically­ the same car) has amber rear signals...it makes all the>>difference in the world! Those you *can* see very clearly regardless if>>the brake lights are lit or not.>
NHTSA (the DOT) says "Automakers prefer to have the choice of color. Show> us a pile of dead bodies from red signals, heh heh heh, and we'll consider> mandating them, heh heh heh.">
Ford and GM say "There's no proof amber signals are better" (despite GM> having specifically illustrated the amber signals on the new-for-'01 Chev> truck in the promotional brochure and expounded on their "clearer> signal").>
American Honda says "Americans prefer red signals.">

And I'd argue that the advantage of amber over red was very VERY small,
UNTIL the duelling-red implementations came out. Then it became huge.

Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 11 February 2005 02:01:44 permanent link ]
 On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Steve wrote:
Bill 2 wrote:
As far as the engine, Chrysler has popped out a couple bad ones in> > their time,
Can't think of a single bad one prior to the mid 90s when the 2.0 head> gasket fiasco happened. Not counting the Mitsubishi junk they sold,> Chrysler hand't had a flawed engine in the whole history of the company> until then.

*cough*VW 1.7 in early OmniRizon*cough*


Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 11 February 2005 22:51:55 permanent link ]
 On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Nate Nagel wrote:
but people disliked the look of amber turn signals
I still don't buy this. I think most people don't care.
A lot of people do, look a the proliferation of "M3" style aftermarket> taillights (look stock but with clear lens turn signal segments)

Nonresponsive.

The claim is that the color of the light was objectionable to Americans
(maybe that's how you can tell a real patriot?). Amber turn signals can
look amber, red, pink, colorless/clear, colorless/chrome or yellow when
not emitting light. "They make the car look unattractive" is therefore a
bogus excuse.

DS
Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 12 February 2005 19:38:46 permanent link ]
 On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Nate Nagel wrote:
The claim is that the color of the light was objectionable to> > Americans (maybe that's how you can tell a real patriot?). Amber turn> > signals can look amber, red, pink, colorless/clear, colorless/chrome> > or yellow when not emitting light. "They make the car look> > unattractive" is therefore a bogus excuse.
I agree, but I imagine it's cheaper to make a red lens that transmits> red light

Ah, but "cheaper" is a different question entirely.
Add comment
Steve 15 February 2005 02:00:10 permanent link ]
 Nate Nagel wrote:

Really the Germans are the only ones that I trust > for a "drive virtually forever" car (not counting older MoPar and other > well-engineered American cars) but even they have lately succumbed to > the disease of over-gatgetizing their vehicles to the point that they'd > be an absolute nightmare to troubleshoot 10-15 years down the road.

Indeed.

http://www.comics.c­om/comics/getfuzzy/a­rchive/getfuzzy-2005­0208.html

:)­

Add comment
Daniel J. Stern 15 February 2005 03:20:02 permanent link ]
 On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Steve wrote:
*cough*VW 1.7 in early OmniRizon*cough*
Never had a lick of trouble with that engine in the one my Dad had.

Yeah, and Paul T. managed to make 2.6s run well and last. And Hemi A. has
some ungodly number of hundreds of thousands of miles on the 3.0 in his
minivan. *shrug*
Yes, it was a buzzing gutless POS, but it ran longer than the rest of> the car did...

As I was saying...
which isn't saying too much, come to think of it. :-p­

As you were saying...
Add comment
Comboverfish 15 February 2005 06:19:02 permanent link ]
 
Nate Nagel wrote:
Of course, we can agree to blame VW for their shitty heater cores,
I'm> totally with you on that one. There's no excuse for heater cores
that> fail every 8-10 years like clockwork on a well maintained car.

Yeah, sounds like the Renault Alliance, Defiance, Appliance, etc. Oh
wait... you said every 8 to 10 years. I thought you said every 8 to 10
months.

Toyota MDT in MO

Add comment
Geoff 18 February 2005 00:39:53 permanent link ]
 

Steve wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:30:34 -0600> From: Steve <no@spam.thanks>> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.ch­rysler> Subject: Re: Consumer Reports rates minivans>
Art wrote:>
Not surprisingly, Honda and Toyota were rated the tops in minivans though if> > you really want those fold down seats, Consumer Reports gave Chrysler the> > nod. The Chrysler did not do as well as Honda and Toyota on the drivetrain,> > noise and ride.>
CR are idiots. Always have been, show no signs of changing.>
About here is where ol' Lloyd would pick up the CR torch.

Did he die or something?

--Geoff
Add comment
Steve 18 February 2005 23:46:46 permanent link ]
 
About here is where ol' Lloyd would pick up the CR torch.>
Did he die or something?>
--Geoff

Probably finally realized that he doesn't have much reason to post here
since he hasn't owned a Chrysler product in years.

Or got fired and lost his free internet access through Emory :-p­


But hey, we've got Glickman as a replacement. And if nothing else at
least he's less predictable than Yoid was...

;-)­
Add comment
Geoff 19 February 2005 00:19:04 permanent link ]
 

Steve wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:46:46 -0600> From: Steve <no@spam.thanks>> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.ch­rysler> Subject: Re: Consumer Reports rates minivans>
About here is where ol' Lloyd would pick up the CR torch.> >
Did he die or something?> >
--Geoff>
Probably finally realized that he doesn't have much reason to post here> since he hasn't owned a Chrysler product in years.>
Or got fired and lost his free internet access through Emory :-p­>
But hey, we've got Glickman as a replacement. And if nothing else at> least he's less predictable than Yoid was...>
;-)­>
Talk about being damned with faint praise!

=:-O

-Geoff
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Chrysler > Consumer Reports rates minivans 19 February 2005 00:19:04

see also:
just bought a 1987 s10 blazer 4X4 with…
Re: New Mexico and New York
2008 - 05 - TUR - Practice 3
pass tests:
see also:
BMW325 TDS INJECTOR PUMP
106 dashboard bulbs
2006 Beetle atf dip stick

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .