Can I learn the ip-address of the person whose comment is in my blog?
Re: ATF+4 in '95 Voyager?
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• CarGuru
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

CarGuru > Chrysler > Re: ATF+4 in '95 Voyager? 3 February 2005 14:23:56

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Re: ATF+4 in '95 Voyager?

Richard 1 February 2005 19:39:13
 
This seems to indicate that the only problem might be with breaking in>> a new torque convertor, which surely won't be a problem with our van>> with 112,000 miles. Are there other problems that we might encounter?>> I've seen some comments about leaking seals.>>
Please remove the "nospam" from my address if responding via email.>> -->> Jeff Wieland>> 95 Voyager SE 3.0L (still running strong -- hopefully!)>> 98 Neon R/T(RIP)>> 01 Neon R/T>> http://valkyrie.itt­.purdue.edu/~wieland­/neon/>
It is not just breaking in a new torque converter that is of concern. If the
transmission's computer has to reprogram itself it goes through a cycle that
could result in clutch chatter if +4 is being used instead of +3. Are you
confused yet? Except for that one little issue +4 is superior in every way.
Really look out if they put in +4, plus an additive.

Richard.


Add comment
Jdoe 3 February 2005 14:23:56 permanent link ]
 Why bother? It's fine leave it alone.
Larry
"Jeff Wieland" <wieland@nospampurd­ue.edu> wrote in message
news:ctqtd9$m2v$1@m­ailhub227.itcs.purdu­e.edu...> In article <10vv8l0dtqouo3f@co­rp.supernews.com> "Richard" <rfeirste at > nycap.rr.com> writes:>>
This seems to indicate that the only problem might be with breaking in>>>> a new torque convertor, which surely won't be a problem with our van>>>> with 112,000 miles. Are there other problems that we might encounter?>>>> I've seen some comments about leaking seals.>>>>
Please remove the "nospam" from my address if responding via email.>>>> -->>>> Jeff Wieland>>>> 95 Voyager SE 3.0L (still running strong -- hopefully!)>>>> 98 Neon R/T(RIP)>>>> 01 Neon R/T>>>> http://valkyrie.itt­.purdue.edu/~wieland­/neon/>>>
It is not just breaking in a new torque converter that is of concern. If >>the>>transmission­'s computer has to reprogram itself it goes through a cycle >>that>>could result in clutch chatter if +4 is being used instead of +3. Are you>>confused yet? Except for that one little issue +4 is superior in every >>way.>>Really look out if they put in +4, plus an additive.>>
Richard.>
They didn't put in any additives. I've been thinking about running> the tranmission through the retraining procedure on> http://www.allpar.c­om/fix/trans.html once the roads clear up around> here. It is driving and shifting fine.>
I'm also thinking about putting a tranmission cooler on it. True,> it might have been better to have done it 10 years ago, but since> we're trying to squeeze a few more years out of it, it seems like> a good idea.> --> Jeff Wieland


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


CarGuru > Chrysler > Re: ATF+4 in '95 Voyager? 3 February 2005 14:23:56

see also:
bud8car and little boys5
Re: Chinese study
Kurt Busch to Oval Office?
pass tests:
see also:
4.6l Ford stalling
I P brake light stays onin my 1995…
Peugoet 106 xs m reg ENGINE PROBLEMS

  Copyright © 2001—2009 Car-Guru
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.car-guru.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.car-guru.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.car-guru.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .